Objectives To evaluate the clinical outcomes and identify its associated factors in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Tianjin city. Methods Data were obtained from Tianjin urban employee basic medical insurance database. Adult patients who were discharged alive after the first ACS-related hospitalization (the index hospitalization) during January, 2012 to December, 2014 and without malignant tumor were included. Clinical outcomes were measured by subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, all-cause death, or their composite endpoint. Cox model was used to explore the factors associated with MACE. Results 22 041 patients were identified, in which 9.5% experienced MACE during follow-up with a mean number of 1.3 MACEs. 3.1% of patients had MI, 5.7% had stroke and 1.4% had all-cause death. Among patients who experienced MACEs, the average time from index discharge to the 1st MACE was 143.2 days. Patients being older, male or had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were more likely to experience MACE. Patients who had prior stroke and prior all-cause hospitalization were also more likely to experience MACE, whereas patients who had prior angina, prior β-blockers utilization and received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during index event were less likely to experience MACE. Conclusion Stroke is the most common type of MACE among ACS patients in Tianjin, China. Almost half of the 1st MACE occur within the 3 months after ACS. Patients who are older, male, have higher CCI or have prior stroke are at higher risk of MACE.
When there is a lack of head-to-head randomized controlled trials between two interventions of interest, indirect comparison methods can be employed to estimate their relative treatment effects. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a population-adjusted indirect comparison method that utilizes a weighting approach. Unanchored MAIC is particularly applicable in scenarios where a common control group between the two interventions is not available. This article introduces the background and mathematical theory of unanchored MAIC, along with a demonstration of the operational steps and interpretation of results through an application example.
As an important source for real-world data, existing health and medical data have gained wide attentions recently. As the first part of the serial technical guidance for real-world data and studies, this report introduced the concepts, features and potential applications of existing medical and health data, proposed recommendations for planning and developing a research database using existing health and medical data, and developed essential indicators for assessing the quality of such research databases. The technical guidance may standardize and improve the development of research database using existing health and medical data in China.
The application of economic tools to evaluate the cost and health benefits and screen out more cost-effective drugs and technologies is an important measure to improve efficiency of medical resource allocation in China. Given the inherent differences between strict clinical trials and clinical routine practice, using trial-based economic evaluations to guide relevant medical decisions may lead to a certain risk of value deviation. Recent development of real-world data provides opportunities to assess the cost-effectiveness of drugs under the practical utilization, and has gradually become a new research hotspot. However, the complexity of the actual clinical environment also puts higher demands on researchers and decision makers to construct, understand and apply real-world evidence. In order to further prompt the normalization of economic evaluation based on real-world data and promote the scientific application of real-world evidence in medical and health decision-making, this project aims at the crucial issues including scope, research design and quality evaluation, to clarify the key considerations on the using of real-world evidence in medical decision-making. Combined with the international guidelines, the latest advancement of relevant research areas and the advice and opinions from multidisciplinary experts, we aim to provide technical references and guidance for researchers and decision makers, and to strengthen the evidence base of management policies.