ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of warfarin and enoxaparin overlapping treatment for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS). MethodsA decision tree model was constructed. The efficacy data applied in our decision tree were from clinical data, and the cost data was based on the hospitalization cost of 103 patients with nephrotic syndrome in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from 2013 to 2014, State Development and Reform Commission pricing and literature report. The one-way sensitivity analyses was conducted to analyze the stability of test. ResultsIn base case, the cost and cost-effective ratio of warfarin and enoxaparin overlapped treatment for 3 days were 10305.49 yuan and 31607.15, respectively. While those overlapped treatment for 4 days were 8849.36 yuan and 20896.46, overlapped treatment for 5 days and above were 9494.29 yuan and 21659.95, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 4 days versus 5 days and above was 5600.96. The cost-effective ratio of 4 days was lower but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of it was higher. The sensitivity analysis showed the test result was stable. ConclusionCost-effectiveness analysis shows that warfarin and enoxaparin overlapping treatment for 4 days in patients with nephrotic syndrome has cost-effective advantage. Due to the limited sample size of our study, the above conclusion should be proved by more large-scale high-quality clinical studies.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze off-label drug use (OLDU) situation of ambroxol hydrochloride injection (AHI) among inpatients in the Guangdong General Hospital in 2012, so as to provide references for AHI OLDU. MethodsAll medical orders of AHI for inpatients in the Guangdong General Hospital in 2012 were included, and OLDU was judged according to drug labels. We summarized situation of drug use in all departments, analyzed OLDU incidence in administration path and in dose, calculated prescribed daily dose (PDD) and utilization index (DUI) in each department to evaluate the degree of OLDU in dose. Resultsa) A total of inpatients 138 227 patient-days who used AHI were included. OLDU occurred in all departments in this hospital and the total OLDU incidence was 67.06%. b) OLDU in dose occurred in 71.43% of the departments (25/35) with an incidence of 29.53%; the top 4 departments were cardiac surgery intensive care unit department (CICU) (97.74%), cardiac surgery department (97.51%), pediatric cardiac surgery department (72.30%) and pediatric intensive care unit department (PICU) (70.28%) in order. c) The PDDs in CICU department, cardiac surgery department, PICU departments, pediatric cardiac surgery department, oncological surgery ward, neurosurgery ward and intensive care unit (ICU) were higher than the defined daily dose (DDD), of which, the DUI/cDUI in CICU, cardiac surgery department, PICU and pediatric cardiac surgery department were 1 to 3 times higher than normal level. d) No relevant adverse drug reaction/adverse event (ADR/AE) reports were received in this hospital in 2012. ConclusionAHI is widely used in the Guangdong General Hospital, and AHI OLDU is commonly-seen. Further studies should be conducted to analyze the influence factors of AHI OLDU in dose and to evaluate the rationality of its application.