ObjectiveTo highlight the characteristics of secondary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) associated with malignant hematological diseases. MethodsThe clinical data of three patients with secondary PAP were analyzed and the related literature was reviewed. ResultsThree patients were diagnosed with secondary PAP by exclusion of primary or autoimmune PAP and denied the history of inhalation of occupational dusts. Two patients with secondary PAP were associated with chronic myelocytic leukemia, and the third one was associated with myelodysplastic syndrome. The performance on HRCT of the PAP associated with hematological malignancy was different from the primary PAP. Three patients were pathologically diagonised by brochoalveolar lavage fluid. One patient was successfully treated with inhalation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). ConclusionsSecondary PAP associated with hematological malignancy is very rare. The untypical HRCT is the main cause of misdiagnosis. Some patients may benefit from GM-CSF theatment.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the clinical response rate of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor modified-T cells (CD19CART) in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect cohort studies about CD19CART in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies from 2000 to 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, a single rate meta-analysis was performed by R software and SPSS 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 13 prospective cohort studies were included. The results of single group rate meta-analysis showed that the overall pooled response rate of CD19 CART was 68% (95%CI 0.51 to 0.82). The 6 months and 1-year PFS after CD19 CART infused by Kaplan-Meier were 46% (95%CI 0.35 to 0.56) and 24% (95%CI 0.16 to 0.34), respectively. The median duration was 180 days (95%CI 138 to 222). The COX regression model showed lymphodepletion to be the only influence factor of PFS.ConclusionsCD19 CART has a good clinical response rate in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies. Lymphodepletion is the only important impact on the response rate and PFS. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of palifermin on oral mucositis (OM) and acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) for hematological malignancy patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy of palifermin on OM and aGVHD for hematological malignancy patients undergoing HSCT from inception to September 30th, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 904 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: palifermin could reduce the duration of OM grade 2 to 4 (MD=−4.21, 95%CI −7.83 to −0.58, P=0.02), OM grade 3 to 4 (MD=−2.54, 95%CI −4.61 to −0.46, P=0.02) significantly for hematological malignancy patients undergoing HSCT. However, no significant difference was found in the prevalence of aGVHD grade 2 to 4 (RR=1.29, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.75, P=0.11), aGVHD grade 3 to 4 (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.77, P=0.97), OM grade 2 to 4 (RR=0.86, 95%CI 0.72 to 1.03, P=0.11) and OM grade 3 to 4 (RR=0.82, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.03, P=0.08) between palifermin group and placebo group. The prevalence of paresthesia (RR=4.24, 95%CI 1.24 to 14.56, P=0.02) and erythema (RR=1.49, 95%CI 1.06 to 2.09, P=0.02) were significantly higher in palifermin group.ConclusionsThe durations of OM grade 2 to 4, 3 to 4 are significantly reduce in patients receiving palifermin compared with those receiving a placebo, however, no statistically significant difference are found in the incidence of aGVHD grade 2 to 4, 3 to 4, OM grade 2 to 4, 3 to 4. Parethesia and erythema are more prevalent among patients using palifermin. Therefore, advantages and disadvantages of palifermin should be considered when used in clinical.