Objective To summarize the experience of the prevention of early arterial compl ications after hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction in adult-to-adult l iving donor l iver transplantation (A-A LDLT). Methods Between January 2002and March 2008, 127 patients underwent A-A LDLT. Of the 131 donors (127 cases of right lobe graft, 4 cases of left lobe graft), there were 69 males and 62 females with a mean age of 36.2 years (range, 19-65 years); in 127 recipients, there were 109 males and 18 females with a mean age of 41.9 years (range, 18-64 years). All patients underwent microsurgical reconstruction of HA between grafts and recipients. The artery of graft was anastomosed to the right HA in 62 cases, to the proper HA in 34 cases, to the left HA in 7 cases, to the common HA in 6 cases, and aberrant right HA rising from superior mesenteric artery in 8 cases. Interposition bypass using great saphenous vein (GSV) was performed between the donor right HA and recipient common HA in 5 cases. Bypass was performed between the donor right HA and recipient abdominal aorta using GSV in 2 cases, or using cryopreserved cadaveric il iac vessels in 3 cases. Results Of these 127 cases, hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) occurred in 2 recipients (1.6%) at 1 day and 7 days following A-A LDLT, which were successfully revascularized with GSV between right HA of donor and abdominal aorta of recipient, HAT in 1 patient occurred on the 46th postoperative day with no symptom. No other arterial compl ication such as HA stenosis and aneurysm occurred in recipients. All patients were followed up 9-67 months. At 1, 2, and 3 years, actual survival rateswere 82.2%, 64.7%, and 59.2%. No death was related to HA compl ication in peri-operative period. Conclusion The anatomic structure and variation of HA, the pathological changes, as well as surgical technique in HA reconstruction, have direct impact on the risk of postoperative compl ications of HA reconstruction.
Objective To investigate the significance of hepatic arterial reconstruction on the model of 40% small-for-size orthotopic liver transplantation in rats. Methods Modified two-cuff technique was applied to establish a rat model of 40% orthotopic liver transplantation. A total of 240 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: reconstructive artery group and non-reconstructive artery group. One week survival rate was observed. Main indexes of liver function, histology and the expression of proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) of liver graft （by immunohistochemical method） were detected on day 1, 2, 4 and 7 after transplantation, respectively. Results One week survival rates of reconstructive artery group and non-reconstructive artery group were 65.0% (13/20) and 50.0% (10/20) respectively (Pgt;0.05). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TB) began to elevate from day 1 and peaked on day 2 after surgery in two groups. ALT in non-reconstructive artery group on day 2 and 4 were significantly higher than that in reconstructive artery group (P＜0.05). TB in non-reconstructive artery group on day 2 and 7 were significantly higher than that in reconstructive artery group (P＜0.05). Histological findings indicated that more diploid and polyploid hepatocytes and more gently dilation of central veins and hepatic sinusoids could be seen postoperatively in reconstructive artery group. The expression of PCNA of liver graft peaked on day 2 after surgery. The expression of PCNA of reconstructive artery group was higher on day 1 (P＜0.01) and lower on day 7 than that of non-reconstructive artery group after operation (P＜0.05). Conclusions Arterial reconstruction can improve liver function of liver grafts after small-for-size orthotopic liver transplantation, alleviate the histological changes and promote the regeneration of liver grafts quickly.
Objective To explore the methods of hepatic artery reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation （LT） and prevention of relevant complications postoperatively. Methods A retrospective analysis was made for 31 cases orthotopic LT. Results The variations of hepatic arteries, which did not exist in the recipients, were found in 2 living donors. In 1 case, the accessory left hepatic artery arose from the left gastric artery. The ends of accessory left hepatic artery and left hepatic artery were made into one end through angioplasty on the back table. An interposition graft of donor great saphenous vein was used in the arterial reconstruction. In the other cases, the accessory right hepatic artery originating from gastroduodenal artery and the right hepatic artery were anastomosed to the branches of the hepatic artery of the recipient separately. In 1 patient receiving dual graft LT, the arteries of the grafts were nastomosed to the branches of the hepatic artery of the recipient separately. The diameters of hepatic arteries were less than 3 mm in 6 cases and more than 5 mm in 8 cases, the others were 3 to 5 mm. Donor iliac arterial graft was used for interposition between graft hepatic artery and recipient abdominal aorta in 1 case. Microsurgical vascular techniques was utilized in the reconstruction of hepatic artery. The time for an arterial reconstruction was 23-70 min 〔（31.46±9.07） min〕. The patients were followed up for 2-7 months. Hepatic artery stenosis was detected in 1 case on 32 d after LT, and no other arterial complications were found. Conclusion To attach importance to factors contributing to hepatic artery complications, the microsurgical technique applied in the reconstruction of the hepatic artery and appropriate anticoagulation can help to prevent the hepatic artery complications in LT.