Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of high-dose chemotherapy assisted with autologous peripheral blood stem cell treatment (APBSCT+HDC) for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods The databases such as MEDLINE (1970 to January 2011), EMBASE (1980 to January 2011), Science Direct (1980 to January 2011), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2010), CNKI (from the date of establishment to December 2010), CBM (from the date of establishment to December 2010) and Wanfang database (from the date of establishment to December 2010) were searched for collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on APBSCT+HDC for SCLC. According to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, the trials were screened, the data were extracted, the methodological quality was assessed, and then Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 737 patients with SCLC were included. The results of Meta-analyses were as follows: the APBSCT+HDC for SCLC was significantly superior to the conventional chemotherapy in the total effective rate (RR=1.14, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.21, Plt;0.000 1) and the overall survival rate (RR=3.74, 95%CI 2.13 to 6.58, Plt;0.000 01), and it was superior in reducing the incidence of III/IV grade red blood cell reduction (RR=1.97, 95%CI 1.15 to 3.38, P=0.01) and thrombopenia (RR=1.93, 95%CI 1.06 to 3.54, P=0.03) with significant differences; but there was no significant difference between the two groups in reducing the incidence of III/IV leukopenia. Conclusions Compared with the conventional chemotherapy, APBSCT+HDC treatment for SCLC can improve the overall effective rate and overall survival rate, but it can also increase the risks of severe hematologic toxic reaction. Because of the small scale and low quality of the included studies, this conclusion still needs to be confirmed by high-quality, large-scale and multi-centered RCTs.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of autologous stem cell transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma. Method Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of autologous stem cell transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma were collected from MEDLINE (1990-2009), EMBASE (1990-2009), OVID (1990-2009), and the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2009), and the proceedings of ASH were searched manually. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated, and data analysis was performed with software STATA 10.0 and RevMan 4.3. Result A total of 4 RCTs involving 941 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that overall survival rate (HR=0.82, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.15), event-free survival rate (HR=0.35, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.47), total remission rate (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.30), and secondary malignant tumor incidence rate (RR=1.68, 95%CI 0.47 to 6.07). Conclusion According to the present evidences, autologous stem cell transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy can not improve overall survival rate and total remission rate, but can improve event-free survival rate, and do not increase secondary malignant tumor incidence rate. However, more high-quality, multiple-center, large-sample randomized controlled trials are required.
Objective To assess the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy versus moderate-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, OVID database, CBMdisc, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, and handsearched Journal of Chinese Oncology, Journal of Chinese Clinical Oncology and Tumor. The search time was updated to Feburary 2006.The quality of the included studies was evaluated by two reviewers and meta-analyses were performed on the results of homogenous studies. Results Four studies involving 937 participants with primary, high-grade and non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma were included. All the included studies were judged to be inadequate at reporting randomization and blinding, only one reported allocation concealment. All included studies reported the number of withdrawals and the reasons for these. The meta-analyses showed that there were no significant differences in 5-year event free survival (EFS) (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96 to1.25), 5-year overall survival (OS) (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to1.20), local recurrence rate (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.57), proportion of good histological response (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.07), proportion of limb salvage [RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02) between the high-dose group and the moderate-dose group. The 5-year EFS of the good histological response group was significantly higher than in the poor histological response group [OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.39,Plt;0.00001 ). Conclusions No advantage is shown for high-dose chemotherapy over moderate-dose chemotherapy in 5-year EFS, 5-year OS, local recurrence rate, proportion of good histological response and proportion of limb salvage. Histological response to preoperative chemotherapy is an independent prognosis factor for osteosarcoma. Due to the potential risk of selection bias, performance bias and publication bias, the evidence is not b enough to judge whether high-dose chemotherapy is better than moderate-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Our conclusion suggests that large-scale randomized trials should be performed.