Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of limited open reduction and double plates internal fixation in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 12 patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty between May 2007 and October 2012, who underwent limited open reduction and double plates internal fixation. Of 12 patients, 4 were male and 8 were female, aged 76-85 years (mean, 81.6 years); the left side was involved in 5 patients and the right side in 7 patients. The cement prosthesis was used in 3 cases and cementless prosthesis in 9 cases; double acting head of hip arthroplasty was performed in 4 cases and total hip arthroplasty in 8 cases. The median time from first hip arthroplasty to re-fracture was 13 months (range, 5 months-5 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 2 cases and falling in 10 cases. Combined fractures included contralateral tibial and fibular fractures and ipsilateral distal humeral fracture (1 case), ipsilateral proximal humeral fracture (2 cases), ipsilateral distal radial fracture (1 case), and rib fracture (1 case). The time from injury to operation was 5.6 days on average (range, 3-10 days). Results The incisions all healed by first intention, and no infection or deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. Twelve cases were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 13.3 months). One female patient died of acute myocardial infarction at 16 months after operation. All the fractures were healed, with X-ray healing time of 12.5 weeks on average (range, 10-16 weeks). The time of full weight bearing was 13 weeks on average (range, 10-18 weeks). Ten cases could walk freely after operation, and 2 cases could walk by the aid of walking aid appliance. At last follow-up, the Harris score of hip function was 87.3 on average (range, 75-93). Conclusion The method of limited open reduction and double plates internal fixation for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty is effective in maintaining stability, protecting blood supply, promoting fracture healing, and doing functional exercise early. The long-term effectiveness needs further observation.
Objective To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of two-stage hip prosthesis revision in the treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty. Methods Between April 2002 and November 2006, 12 cases of infection after hip arthroplasty were treated. There were 5 males and 7 females, aged from 47 to 72 years (mean, 59.8 years). The femoral head arthroplasty wasperformed in 2 cases and total hip arthroplasty in 10 cases. Infection occurred 1 to 67 months after arthroplasty. According to the Segawa classification criteria, infections included type 2 in 1 case, type 3 in 2 cases, and type 4 in 9 cases. The preoperative Harris score was 36.7 ± 6.1. Nine cases had elevated C reactive protein and 10 cases had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The results of bacterial culture were positive in 8 cases and negative in 4 cases. After the removal of the infected prosthesis and thorough debridement, antibiotic-loaded cement spacers or infected therapeutic temporary prosthesis were used as placeholders, and then the anti-infection treatments were given after operations; two-stage hip prosthesis revisions were performed 3 to 10 months after debridement. Results In 1 patient who failed to control infection after debridement, infection was controlled after the second debridement and the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer as placeholder. Other patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention, and no compl ication such as deep venous thrombosis and nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 3 to 8 years after revision (mean, 5.4 years). During the follow-up, no infection recurrence and joint dislocation occurred. Dull pain was present in 2 cases during activity and mild claudication in 3 cases at last follow-up. The Harris score was 81.6 ± 4.5, showing significant difference (t=52.696, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score. The X-ray films showed that noprosthesis loosening and obvious subsidence were observed, and bone graft healed. Conclusion The two-stage hip prosthesis revision has good infection control rate and mid-term effectiveness in treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty.
To discuss the effect of dexamethasone in preventing fat embol ism syndrome (FES) in cemented hi p arthroplasty patients. Methods Forty patients scheduled for unilateral cemented hi p arthroplasty between January 2008 and December 2009 were randomly divided into trial group (n=20) and control group (n=20). In trial group, there were 6 males and 14 females with an average age of 73.2 years (range, 54-95 years), including 4 cases of osteoarthritis, 3 cases ofavascular necrosis of femoral head, and 13 cases of femoral neck fracture; the disease duration was 4 days to 6 years (median, 0.8 year). In control group, there were 10 males and 10 females with an average age of 71.9 years (range, 59-91 years), including 2 cases of osteoarthritis, 3 cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head, and 15 cases of femoral neck fracture; the disease duration was 3 days to 5 years (median, 0.6 year). There was no significant difference in gender, age, or disease duration (P gt; 0.05) between 2 groups. Cemented total or bipolar hip arthroplasty (with the same brand of cement and prosthesis) in 2 groups were performed by a group of surgeons. The patients were given intravenously injected with dexamethasone (20 mg) in trial group before 1 hour of cement injection and intravenously injected with normal sal ine (2 mL) in control group. Amount of 5 mL vein blood were withdrawn before surgery, after 4, 8, and 24 hours of cement injection to test the number and average diameter of fat droplets. According to Gurd diagnosis standard, related FES symptoms and signs were inspected. Results Primary heal ing of incision was achieved in all cases of 2 groups. According to Gurd standard of diagnosis, no FES occurred in each group at 2 weeks postoperatively; deep venous thrombosis occurred in 2 cases (10%) of trial group and in 5 cases (25%) of control group, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The number and diameter of fat droplets in trial group were significantly lower than those in control group at 4, 8, and 24 hours of cement injection (P lt; 0.01). All cases were followed up 7.4 months on average (range, 3-13 months). The postoperative Harris score was 89.5 ± 6.1 in trial group and 87.9 ± 8.3 in control group, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). No loosening occurred during follow-up period. Conclusion Intravenous injection withdexamethasone can effectively reduce the number and diameter of venous fat droplets in cemented hip arthroplasty, which can decrease the risk of postoperative FES.
Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect of distal fixed modular femoral prosthesis for the hip prosthesis revision. Methods Between August 2004 and May 2008, cementless modular femoral prosthesis was used for hip prosthesis revision in 21 cases. There were 9 males and 12 females, aged from 49 to 72 years (mean, 64.6 years). The timefrom revision to total hip arthroplasty was 2 to 18 years (mean, 11.7 years). The causes of revision included aseptic loosening in 19 cases (5 cases were periprosthetic femoral fracture), and deep infection in 2 cases. First revision was given in all patients. Preoperative Harris score was 41.8 ± 3.5; pain visual analogue score (VAS) was 7.62 ± 0.86. Results All patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention, and no deep venous thrombosis and nerve injury occurred. Twenty-one cases were followed up 2 to 6 years with an average of 4.3 years. No prosthetic loosening or infection occurred. Bone ingrowth was observed around the implant during the follow-up period. At last follow-up, 2 cases had femoral stem subsidence without obvious hip pain and other symptoms, and no special treatment was given. Harris score was 82.7 ± 3.3 and VAS score was 0.19 ± 0.51 at last follow-up, showing significant differences when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The short-term result of modular femoral prosthesis is satisfactory in hip prosthesis revision, and it can improve the hip function and rel ieve the pain greatly.
Objective Use the method of Cochrane systematic review to evaluate the difference of two fixation methods of femoral component in hip arthroplasty in order to choose the most appropriate fixation method. Methods Searches was applied to the following electronic databases: Chinese Bimedical Database (CBM) (1979 to Dec. 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to Feb. 2005), EMBASE (1984 to 2004) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004). We handsearched Chinese Journal of Orthopaedy, the Journal of Bone and Joint Injury and Orthopaedic Journal of China (from establishment to Feb. 2005). Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were indentified and we applied RevMan 4.2 for statistical analysis. Results Nine RCTs involving 1 075 hips were included. The combined results of meta-analysis showed that the embolization occurred more commonly in the first and second generation cemented group (OR 0.02, 95%CI 0 to 0.11, P＜0.000 01), but this difference was not seen between the third generation cemented group and uncemented group (OR 0.80, 95%CI 0.36 to 1.78, P=0.58); The subsidence of femoral component (OR 12.20, 95%CI 3.58 to 41.54, P＜0.000 1) and the cortical hypertrophy (OR 69.97, 95%CI 27.88 to 175.57, P＜0.000 01) were more commonly found in uncemented group; the thigh pain occurrence, the revision for the femoral component’s cause and heterotopic ossification were found no significant difference in the two groups. Conclusions Compared with noncemented group, we found that cemented fixation may be more associated with embolism in the first and second generation cemented technique and less with femoral subsidence and cortical hypertrophy. There was no significant difference in embolization between the third generation cemented technique group and noncemented group. However, more randomized controlled trials to evaluate the occurrence of the postoperative thigh pain, revision and heterotopic ossification are needed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical e cacy of hip arthroplasty in treating intracapsular femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2012, 198 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures (Garden Ⅲ and Ⅳ ), aged between 65 and 85 years old were selected to be treated with hip arthroplasty. Clinical evaluation including Harris hip score, Barthel index, postoperative complications and activities of daily living were performed. ResultsThe patients were followed up for an average time of 15.6 months. At the follow-up time of 12 months, the Harris scores were 85-98, averaging 94.5; the Barthel indexes were 86-97, averaging 94.0. The main postoperative complications were subcutaneous fat necrosis (3 cases), deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs (2 cases), bedsores (2 cases), pulmonary infection (4 cases), dislocation (2 cases) and pain (4 cases). More than 95% of the patients had a satisfactory treatment and recovered activities of daily living. ConclusionHip arthroplasty reduces postoperative complications caused by prolonged bed rest and helps the patients get back to normal activities of daily living early, so it is an effective method to treat intracapsular femoral neck fractures and is suitable for widespread clinical application.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of local infiltration analgesia on postoperative pain after hip arthroplasty. MethodsRelevant randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesia effect and adverse effects between local infiltration analgesia group and non-local infiltration analgesia group (control group) were identified from Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database and Wanfang database from their establishment until May 2016. A systematic review was performed to compare the pain scores and adverse events between those two groups. Effective data were pooled for Meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.2.0. ResultsTwelve eligible trials were identified in this study. The pain scores of the two groups of patients during rest time after surgery were significantly different[WMD=-19.06, 95%CI (-21.51, -16.62), P<0.000 01]; the pain scores were also significantly different during activity time[WMD=-11.45, 95%CI (-15.56, -7.34), P<0.000 01]. There was significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups[RR=0.59, 95%CI (0.42, 0.84), P=0.003]. The pain degree and incidence of nausea and vomiting in the local infiltration analgesia group were lower than the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of urinary retention, itch and hypotension (P>0.05). ConclusionLocal infiltration analgesia is effective in reducing postoperative pain without any additional adverse reactions.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of preoperative administration of oral carbohydrates in patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty from inception to January, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 10 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the placebo group, the preoperative oral carbohydrate group had no significant differences in postoperative insulin resistance (SMD=5.14, 95%CI –1.05 to 11.33, P=0.10), length of hospital stay (MD=–0.26, 95%CI –1.11 to 0.58, P=0.54), rate of complications (OR=1.46, 95%CI 0.53 to 4.07, P=0.47), postoperative glucose and insulin level. Conclusion Current evidence shows that preoperative oral carbohydrate can not mediate postoperative insulin resistance. It also does not reduce length of hospital stay, postoperative glucose and insulin level. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of cerclage wires fixation in treating Mallory typeⅡperiprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective analysis was made in the data of 14 patients (14 hips) with Mallory typeⅡ periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty and treated with cerclage wires fixation between January 2010 and June 2011 (fracture group). Twenty-eight patients (28 hips) without periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty at the same stage were chosen as control group. The uncemented femoral prosthesis were used in 2 groups. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, and primary disease between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the complications were recorded. The Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the pain degree of hip. According to the postoperative X-ray films of hips, Enghet al. standard was used to evaluate the fixed and stable status of the femoral prosthesis; the heterotopic ossification was observed; the time of fracture union was recorded. Results The operation time of fracture group was significantly longer than that of control group (t=–3.590, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (t=–1.276, P=0.209). All patients were followed up 64-75 months (mean, 69.5 months). Hip dislocation after operation occurred in 1 case of fracture group; delirium symptom and nonunion of incision occurred in 1 case and 1 case of control group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the Harris score and VAS score at 6 months and 5 years between 2 groups (P>0.05). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed and the mean time of fracture union were 6.1 months (range, 3-12 months). There was no fracture nonunion or malunion evidently. There was no significant difference in X-ray score at 6 months and 5 years between 2 groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, cerclage wires displacement or breakage did not occur. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 cases of fracture group and in 1 case of control group. Conclusion Cerclage wires fixation can achieve the good mid-term effectiveness in treating Mallory typeⅡintraoprative periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of comprehensive interventions on the prevention of the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after hip or knee arthroplasty.MethodsPatients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty for the first time in orthopedics department of Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital from January 2016 to March 2018 were selected. The patients were observed after surgery for 1 year, and divided into the control group and the treatment group according to the odd or even hospitalization number. Basic precautions were taken in the control group, while further comprehensive preventive measures (preoperative chlorhexidine bath, intraoperative body temperature maintenance, using antibacterial film over surgery area without shearing, health and education after discharge from hospital) were taken in the treatment group. The incidence of SSI of the two groups was compared to evaluate the effects of comprehensive interventions.ResultsA total of 341 patients were included, including 174 in the control group and 167 in the treatment group. No one failed to be followed up. Among the 341 patients undergoing surgery, 13 had SSI, including 11 (6.3%) in the control group and 2 (1.2%) in the treatment group. The incidence of SSI in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (χ2=6.102, P=0.014). Single factor analysis showed that sex (χ2=10.933, P=0.001), preoperative chlorhexidine sponge bath (χ2=8.837, P=0.003), intraoperative thermal insulation (χ2=13.917, P<0.001), health education (χ2=12.671, P<0.001), skin preparation methods (χ2=6.102, P=0.014), perioperative blood glucose control (χ2=17.512, P=0.003), and surgical type (χ2=8.360,factor P=0.004) were the effect factors of occurrence of SSI. Logistic regression analysis showed that surgical type [odds ratio (OR)=0.129, 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.026, 0.640), P=0.012] and strict blood glucose control [OR=9.868, 95%CI (2.158, 45.131), P=0.003] were the independent factors affecting the occurrence of SSI.ConclusionsComprehensive intervention measures can effectively reduce the occurrence of SSI after hip and knee arthroplasty. It is not confirmed that preoperative chlorhexidine bath can reduce the occurrence of SSI. But choosing selective operation and controlling the perioperative blood glucose below 200 mg/dL can reduce the risk of SSI.