Objective To investigate the early-term effectiveness of extra-large uncemented acetabular components for hip revision in the treatment of extensive acetabular bone defect. Methods Between September 2008 and May 2012, 13 patients (13 hips) with extensive acetabular bone defect underwent first hip revision using extra-large uncemented acetabular components (Jumbo cup). The diameter of Jumbo cup was larger than or equal to 64 mm for male and 60 mm for female. There were 4 males and 9 females with an average age of 64.7 years (range, 58-84 years). The period from primary arthroplasty to revision was 3-16 years (mean, 9.6 years). According to Paprosky classification, acetabular bone defect was rated as stage IIA in 2 cases, as stage IIB in 5 cases, as stage IIC in 4 cases, and as stage IIIA in 2 cases. The preoperative vertical distance from the center of involved femoral head to interteardrop line was (21.2 ± 6.1) mm longer than that of normal side. The Harris score and the rotation center of hip were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Healing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients, and no complication of dislocation, infection, and injury of sciatic nerve or femoral nerve occurred. The duration of follow-up ranged from 13 to 40 months (mean, 23.5 months). Partial or complete pain relief was achieved in all patients. The other patients could walk independently and restored to their routine jobs except for 1 case of hemiplegia caused by acute cerebral infarction at 3 months after surgery. In 5 patients with bone implantation, with the prolonging follow-up, the allograft could integrate with the host bone without absorption, and the bone fusion time was 9-35 months (mean, 14.5 months). At last follow-up, the X-ray films revealed that the vertical distance from the center of involved femoral head to interteardrop line was (6.0 ± 3.1) mm longer than that of normal side, which was significantly reduced when compared with preoperative value (t=11.13, P=0.00). No periprosthetic transparent region, prosthesis displacement, or screw breakage occurred. The Harris score was significantly increased from 30.4 ± 8.8 preoperatively to 85.1 ± 3.2 at last follow-up (t=22.11, P=0.00). Conclusion The application of extra-large uncemented acetabular components could be an effective technique for the reconstruction of extensive acetabular bone defect, and gain a good early-term effectiveness. The long-term survival rate of prostheses needs to be followed up.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of acetabulum reinforcement ring (Cage) with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision. Methods Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (14 hips) with serious acetabular bone defects after total hip arthroplasty underwent acetabular reconstruction by using Cage with allograft bone. There were 6 males and 8 females with a mean age of 59.2 years (range, 45-76 years). The mean time between first replacement and revision was 7.2 years (range, 5-12 years). The revision causes included infection in 8 cases, osteolysis and aseptic loosening in 6 cases. The hip function Harris score was 37.7 ± 5.3. According to America Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS) standard, the acetabular defect was classified as type III in 8 cases and as type IV in 6 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication occurred. The patients were followed up 14-62 months (mean, 44 months). The pain was relieved or disappeared. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 89.7 ± 3.2, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 44.40, P=0.04). No loosening of the acetabular component or osteolysis was found in 14 hips. No absorption or collapse of the allograft was observed in all patients. Conclusion Cage with allograft bone is a useful method of reconstructing acetabular bone defects in hip revision. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo summarize the design and the biomechanical characteristics of Sivash-range of motion femoral modular stem (S-ROM) prosthesis and mainly to introduce its clinical use in developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) and hip revision. MethodsLiterature concerning S-ROM prosthesis was extensively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThe S-ROM prosthesis based on the modularity feature can reach press-fit in metaphysis and diaphysis of femur concurrently. Additionaly, S-ROM prosthesis can fit for anatomic differences of the DDH femur and is capable of use in correction osteotomy and hip revision. ConclusionModular junctions of S-ROM prosthesis increase the potentials of implant fracture and metallic debris production, so further follow-up study is needed to verify the long-term effectiveness.
Objective To investigate the medium- and long-term effectiveness of hip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem in patients with Paprosky typeⅠ-Ⅲ femoral bone defect. MethodsBetween June 2012 and December 2018, 44 patients with Paprosky typeⅠ-Ⅲ femoral bone defect received hip revision using SL-PLUS MIA stem. There were 28 males and 16 females, with an average age of 57.7 years (range, 31-76 years). Indications for revision comprised aseptic loosening (27 cases) and periprosthetic joint infection (17 cases). The Harris hip scores were 54 (48, 60) and 43 (37, 52) in patients with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. The preoperative femoral bone defects were identified as Paprosky type Ⅰ in 32 cases, type Ⅱ in 9 cases, type ⅢA in 2 cases, and type ⅢB in 1 case. Operation time and intraoperative blood transfusion volume were recorded. During follow-up after operation, the hip joint function were evaluated by Harris hip score and X-ray films, the femoral stem survival was analyzed, and the surgical related complications were recorded. Results The operation time of infected patients was 95-215 minutes, with an average of 125.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood transfusion volume was 400-1 800 mL, with an average of 790.0 mL. The operation time of patients with aseptic loosening was 70-200 minutes, with an average of 121.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood transfusion volume was 400-1 400 mL, with an average of 721.7 mL. All patients were followed up 5.3-10.0 years (mean, 7.4 years). At last follow-up, the Harris hip scores were 88 (85, 90) and 85 (80, 88) in patients with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection, respectively, both of which were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). Radiological examination results showed that the distal end of the newly implanted femoral stem did not cross the distal end of the original prosthesis in 25 cases, and all femoral stems obtained bone fixation. Two cases experienced femoral stem subsidence and 1 case had a translucent line on the lateral side of the proximal femoral stem. When aseptic loosening was defined as the end event, the 10-year survival rate of the SL-PLUS MIA stem was 100%. When treatment failure due to any reason was defined as the end event, the survival time of the prosthesis was (111.70±3.66) months, and the 7-year survival rate was 95.5%. The 7-year survival rates were 94.1% and 96.3% in patients with aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was 9.1% (4/44), among which the prosthesis related complications were 4.5% (2/44), 1 case of dislocation and 1 case of infection recurrence. ConclusionHip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem has the advantages of simple operation and few postoperative complications in the patients with Paprosky type Ⅰ-Ⅲ femoral bone defect, and the medium- and long-term effectiveness is reliable.
ObjectiveTo review research progress on the design, manufacturing, and clinical application of three-dimensional (3D) printed customized prostheses in acetabular reconstruction of hip revision surgery. Methods The related research literature on 3D printing customized prosthesis and its application in acetabular reconstruction of hip revision surgery was searched by key words of “ 3D printed customized prosthesis”, “revision hip arthroplasty”, “acetabular bone defect”, and“acetabular reconstruction” from January 2013 to May 2024 in Chinese and English databases, such as CNKI, Wanfang database, PubMed, etc. A total of 34 271 articles were included. After reading the literature titles, abstracts, or full texts, the literature of unrelated, repetitive, low-quality, and low evidence level was screened out, and a total of 48 articles were finally included for analysis and summary. ResultsThe bone growth and mechanical properties of 3D printed customized prosthesis materials are better than those of non-3D printed customized prosthesis, which further solves the problem of elastic modulus mismatch between the implant and natural bone caused by “stress shielding”; the porous structure and antibacterial coating on the surface of 3D printed customized prosthesis have good anti-bacterial effect. 3D printed customized prosthesis can perfectly match the patient's individual acetabular anatomical characteristics and defect type, thus improving the accuracy of acetabular reconstruction and reducing the surgical time and trauma. Conclusion3D printed customized prosthesis can be used for precise and efficient individualized acetabular reconstruction in hip revision surgery with good early- and mid-term effectiveness. More optimized production technics and procedures need to be developed to improve the efficiency of clinical application and long-term effectiveness.