Objective To study the risk factors and prognosis of hospital acquired pneumonia( HAP)caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii( CRAB) . Methods By a case-control study, the data of 44 cases of HAP caused by CRAB fromJan 2005 to Dec 2007 in Nanfang Hospital were analyzed. 66 cases of HAP caused by Carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii ( CSAB) were selected randomly at the same time as control. Univariate analysis( T test and chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistics analysis. Results Univariate analysis revealed that five factors associated with the infection caused by CRAB were APACHE Ⅱ score ≥ 16, chronic pulmonary disease ( COPD/ bronchiectasis ) , imipenem/meropenem and fluoroquinolone used 15 days before isolation of CRAB, and early combination therapy of antibiotics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two independent factors as APACHEⅡ score ≥16( OR=6. 41, 95% CI 2. 20-18. 67) and imipenem/meropenemused 15 days before isolation of CRAB( OR =6. 33,95% CI 1. 83-21. 87) . Of 44 cases of CRAB infections, 14 patients died and 30 patients survived. Univariate analysis revealed that two factors associated with poor prognosis were organ failure and clinical pulmonary infection score( CPIS) rise after three-day treatment. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, only CPIS rise after three-day treatment ( OR =7. 01, 95% CI 1. 23-40. 03) was an independent predictive factor. Conclusions APACHEⅡ score ≥ 16 and imipenem/meropenem used 15 days before isolation of CRAB were independent risk factors for CRAB infection. CPIS rise after three-day treatment was a predictive factor for the prognosis of CRAB infection.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of piperacillin/ tazobactam in the treatment of hospital acquired pneumonia( HAP) . Methods A multicenter, open-labeled, non-comparative clinical trial was conducted. Patients with HAP were administered intravenously with piperacillin /tazobactam( 4. 5 g) every 8 h for 7-14 days. Results A total of 250 patients were enrolled in this study and 246 subjects were clinical valuable. At the end point, the clinical efficacy rate was 81. 7% ( 201 /246) and the bacterial eradication rate was 74. 1% ( 83 /112) . The rate of drug related adverse events was 2. 8% ( 7 /250) , in which 4 cases had clinical significance ( rash, dyspnea, injection site pain and diarrhea, respectively) and 3 cases had abnormal laboratory findings ( hepatic dysfuction , eosinophilia and so on ) . All events were mild and transient . Conclusions Piperacillin/ tazobactamis effective and safe in the treatment of HAP, therefore, it is recommended as one of the first-line antibiotics to treat the patients with HAP.
Objective To investigate the genetic polymorphism of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA) isolated from hospital acquired pneumonia. Methods Seventy-four hospitalized patients were diagnosed as noscomial MRSA pneumonia from January 2007 to January 2008 in Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Univesity. The genes of MRSA were amplified by random amplified polymorphic DNA typing ( RAPD) assay in 82 clinical isolates from these patients. Results Two to 15 amplified DNA fragments were observed in agarose gel and they were classified into 11 genotypes. Genotypes Ⅲ, Ⅵ and Ⅶ ( 32. 56% , 30. 23% and 13. 95% , respectively) were mainly isolated from the ICU. Both independent genotypes and overlapping genotpyes with those from ICU were identified in isolates from the departments of geriatrics, emergency and respiratory medicine. Outbreak or cluster cases ( 48. 65% ) were found in 36 of the 74 patients while all outbreak cases occurred in the ICU. Conclusions Noscomial MRSA pneumonia is easy to disseminate and small-scale outbreak may occur especially in ICU. RAPD is valuable for identification and prevention of the spread of MRSA in hospital.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in post-extubation intensive care unit (ICU) patients.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP Databases were searched for all published available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies about HFNC therapy in post-extubation ICU patients. The control group was treated with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), while the experimental group was treated with HFNC. Two reviewers separately searched the articles, evaluated the quality of the literatures, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis. The main outcome measurements included reintubation rate and length of ICU stay. The secondary outcomes included ICU mortality and hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) rate.ResultsA total of 20 articles were enrolled. There were 3 583 patients enrolled, with 1 727 patients in HFNC group, and 1 856 patients in control group (841 patients with COT, and 1 015 with NIPPV). Meta-analysis showed that HFNC had a significant advantage over COT in reducing the reintubation rate of patients with postextubation (P<0.000 01), but there was no significant difference as compared with that of NIPPV (P=0.21). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in reducing reintubation rate in patients of postextubation (P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in ICU mortality between HFNC and COT (P=0.38) or NIPPV (P=0.36). There was no significant difference in length of ICU stay between HFNC and COT (P=0.30), but there had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV (P<0.000 01). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay (P=0.04). There was no significant difference in HAP rate between HFNC and COT (P=0.61) or NIPPV (P=0.23).ConclusionsThere is a significant advantage to decrease reintubation rate between HFNC and COT, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, length of ICU stay or HAP rate. There is a significant advantage to decrease length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, reintubation rate or HAP rate.