ObjectiveTo observe the characteristics of blue light(BLAF) versus near infrared wavelength (IRAF) fundus autofluorescence in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) patients. MethodsSeventy-seven eyes of 81 patients diagnosed with CSC were enrolled in this study. According to the duration of disease, patients were divided into acute CSC group and chronic or recurrent CSC group. All patients were examined with fundus fluorescein angiography, including BLAF and IRAF. There were forty-six patients (47 eyes) with acute, thirty-one patients (34 eyes) with chronic or recurrent CSC. The characteristics of BLAF and IRAF in CSC were compared. ResultsIn acute CSC, there were nineteen eyes (40.4%) showed scattered hyper-fluorescence corresponding to the leaking points, eleven eyes (23.4%) showed mottled hypo-fluorescence in BLAF; while 17 eyes (36.2%) showed normal change corresponding to the leaking points. There were 35 eyes can be observed serous retinal detachments in the BLAF images, 21 eyes (60.0%) showed hypo-fluorescence and 14 eyes (40.0%) showed hyper-fluorescence. In the IRAF images, 25 eyes (53.2%) showed mottled fluorescence corresponding to the leaking points, 11 eyes (23.4%) presented with scattered hyper-fluorescent spots and normal fluorescence. The serous retinal detachments of 26 eyes exhibited hypo-fluorescence in the IRAF images. In chronic or recurrent CSC, 19 eyes (55.9%) showed scattered hyper-fluorescence corresponding to the leakage points; followed by no abnormal change in 10 eyes, accounting for 29.4%; few showed mottled hypo-fluorescence (5 eyes 14.7%). There were 35 eyes (41.2%) can be observed serous retinal detachments in the BLAF images. IRAF mainly displayed mottled hypo-fluorescence (22 eyes, 64.7%), ten eyes (29.4%) presented with scattered hyper-fluorescence and 2 eyes (5.8%) presented without abnormal change. The serous retinal detachments of 3 eyes (8.8%) exhibited hypo-fluorescence in the IRAF images. ConclusionsFor acute CSC, a variety of fluorescence were showed in BLAF images and the proportion of the various fluorescences was similar; hypo-fluorescence was showed in the IRAF images. For chronic CSC, hyper-fluorescence was showed in BLAF while hypo-fluorescence in the IRAF images.
Objective To observe the optic disc perfusion in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) patients. Methods Forty eyes of 40 AION patients and 30 eyes of 30 normal subjects were included. The stage of the diseases was defined based on the course of the disease, including acute stage (less than 3 weeks) and recovery stage (more than 3 months). Optic disc blood flow area, outer vascular density and blood flow index were measured by optical coherence tomography angiography in all the subjects. Optic disc perfusion was observed in acute and recovery stage of disease. Results The optic disc blood flow area, outer vascular density and blood flow index were decreased of AION eyes in acute stage compared with the normal subjects, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); while the optic disc blood flow area, outer vascular density and blood flow index of AION eyes in the recovery stage showed no significant difference compared with normal subjects (P > 0.05). ConclusionDisc perfusion is reduced in AION at the acute stage, but recovered at the recovery stage.
Idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasis (IPT) is a retinal vascular disease which is characterized by foveal and parafoveal telangiectasia. The main clinical manifestations are retinal telangiectasis, reduced retinal transparency, retinal venular dilatation, yellow exudation, retinal pigment epithelial lesions, retinal hemorrhage, macular atrophy, macular hole or lamellar hole, subretinal neovascularization and retinal detachment. According to the clinical characteristics and features of fluorescein angiography, IPT can be divided into 3 types and 6 subtypes. Laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, and intravitreal injection of glucocorticoid or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, can reduce the macular edema and neovascularization. However, due to the unclear etiology of IPT, the existing treatment measures are not specific for its etiology. We need to work hard to understand further the clinical features and pathogenesis of IPT and search the targeted treatments based on its pathogenesis mechanism.
ObjectiveTo compare the consistency and difference of nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging system versus nonmydriatic 2-field 45°digital fundus photography system in a large-scale diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening. MethodsA total of 733 with type 2 diabetic patients (1466 eyes) underwent nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging and nonmydriatic 2-field 45°digital fundus photography examination. Two independent readers graded images respectively to determine the stage of DR. A third masked retinal specialist adjudicated discrepancies. Using nonmydriatic 2-field 45°digital fundus photography examination as the standard, the consistency of nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging was evaluated. The statistic index included sensitivity, specificity, Youden index and Kappa value. The difference of two methods was analyzed by comparative t-test. ResultsBased on nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging, the results were as follows: non DR (NDR) in 1062 eyes (74.1%), DR in 340 eyes (23.7%), ungradable in 32 eyes (2.2%). Among 340 DR eyes, there were mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR) in 48 eyes, moderate NPDR in 216 eyes, severe NPDR in 57 eyes, proliferative DR (PDR) in 19 eyes. Based on nonmydriatic 2-field 45°digital fundus photography, the results were as follows: NDR in 1080 eyes (75.3%), DR in 270 eyes (18.8%), ungradable in 84 eyes (5.6%). Among 270 DR eyes, there were NPDR in 36 eyes, moderate NPDR in 175 eyes, severe NPDR in 53 eyes, PDR in 6 eyes. Compared with nonmydriatic 2-field 45°digital fundus photography for screening DR, the sensitivity was 98.0%, the specificity was 95.0%, and the kappa value was 0.87. For screening severe NPDR and PDR, the sensitivity was 100.0%, the specificity was 99.0%, and the kappa value was 0.94. The DR detection rate and the ratio of the picture can't interpretation between two methods both had significant difference (P=0.00). ConclusionsIn rapid large-scale DR screening, there is high consistency between nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging versus nonmydriatic 2-field 45°digital fundus photography. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging is proved to be more adaptive, and more comprehensive and precise.