Objective To explore the effects of different humidification and heating strategies during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation( NIPPV) in patients with ALI/ARDS. Methods A total of 45 patients with ALI/ARDS were randomly divided into three groups to receive NIPPV with different humidification and heating strategies, ie. Group A ( humidification with a 370 Humidifier without heating) ,group B ( humidification with a 370 Humidifier along with a MR410 Heater) , and group C ( humidification and heating with aMR850 Humidifier, and a RT308 circuit heater) . The changes of air temperature, absolute humidity, relative humidity, sputum thickness and patient comfort were compared between the three groups. Sputum thickness was evaluated with AWSS scoring system. Results After humidification and heating, the air temperature, absolute humidity and AWSS score improved significantly in group B [ elevated from ( 23. 9 ±1. 0) ℃, (9.8 ±1. 3) mg/L and 2. 0 ±0. 7 respectively to ( 30. 3 ±1. 7) ℃, ( 31. 0 ±2. 3)mg/L and ( 3. 0 ±0. 9) respectively, P lt; 0. 001] and group C [ elevated from( 23. 8 ±1. 0) , ( 9. 8 ±1. 5)mg/L and ( 2. 1 ±0. 7) respectively to ( 34. 0 ±1. 1) ℃, ( 43.8 ±2. 5) mg /L and 3. 5 ±1. 0 respectively,P lt; 0. 001] . Air temperature and absolute humidity were significantly higher in group C than those in group B( P lt; 0. 001) . Of all the parameters, only absolute humidity showed a significant improvment in group A [ elevated from( 9. 9 ±1. 6) mg/L to ( 11. 9 ±0. 9) mg/L, P lt; 0. 001] . The degree of comfort in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and B [ 8. 0 ±1. 7 vs 5. 0 ±1. 2 and 3. 0 ±0. 4, respectively, P lt;0. 001] . In group A seven patients were switched to group C because of discomfort, four accepted NIPPV continuously, and two avoided invasive mechanical ventilation eventually. In group B three patients were switched to group C because of intolerance of too much condensed water in the breathing circuit, all of them accepted NIPPV continuously, and one avoided invasive mechanical ventilation eventually. Conclusions Compared with mere humidification or humidification with heating humidifier, humidification with heating humidifier and circuit heating during NIPPV can improve the absolute humidity, air temperature and patient comfort,meanwhile decreasing the sputumthickness of patients with ALI/ARDS.
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of different airway humidification methods in patients with tracheotomy in weaning process. Methods Twelve patients with tracheotomy in the medical intensive care unit ( MICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sue Yat-sen University fromSeptember 2008 to August 2009 were enrolled in which 45 case /times weaning tests in three different humidification ways were performed( 15 cases in each group) . Wet square gauze method was used in group A and traditional intermittent wet fluid drip method was used in group B. In group C, MR850 humidifier device, RT200 Venturi tube and T tube device were used to perform humidification. Comparisons were carried out between the three groups on sputum viscosity, comfort of patients before and after humidification, length of weaning time, frequencies of irritating coughs and phlegm formation during test period. Sputum viscosity was evaluated by airway secretion score ( AWSS) .Results There was no significant difference of sputum viscosity assessed by AWSS in group A before and after humidification( P gt; 0. 05 ) while AWSS was significantly increased in group B and group C ( P lt;0. 01) , implied that sputum viscosity was significantly lower than that of group A ( P lt;0. 05) . The scores of patients’comfortwere 3. 0 ±0. 4, 5. 0 ±1. 2, and 8. 0 ±1. 7 in groups A, B, and C respectively which mean that the patients in group C felt more comfortable than those in group A and group B ( P lt;0. 01) . Cough frequencies of groups A, B and C per hour were 0. 8,2. 6,and 0. 4 times/hour respectively in which the frequency of group B was significantly higher than those of group A and group C ( P lt;0. 01) . The frequency of phlegm formation in group A was 7 times in 15-times offline record, which was significantly higher than those in group B and group C ( P lt;0. 01) . Conclusions For the patients with tracheotomy in weaning process, MR850 humidifier device, RT200 Venturi tube and T tube device for humidification is superior in reducing sputum viscosity and phlegm formation, improving patient comfort, and reducing the occurrence of irritating cough.
Objective To compare the humidification effect of the MR410 humidification system and MR850 humidification system in the process of mechanical ventilation. Methods Sixty-nine patients underwent mechanical ventilation were recruited and randomly assigned to a MR850 group and a MR410 group. The temperature and relative humidity at sites where tracheal intubation or incision, the absolute humidity, the sticky degree of sputum in initial three days after admission were measured. Meanwhile the number of ventilator alarms related to sputum clogging and pipeline water, incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality were recorded. Results In the MR850 group,the temperature of inhaled gas was ( 36. 97 ±1. 57) ℃, relative humidity was ( 98. 35 ±1. 32) % , absolute humidity was ( 43. 66 ±1. 15) mg H2O/L, which were more closer to the optimal inhaled gas for human body.The MR850 humidification system was superior to the MR410 humidification system with thinner airway secretions, less pipeline water, fewer ventilator alarms, and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in mortality between two groups. Conclusions Compared with MR410 humidification system, MR850 humidification system is more able to provide better artificial airway humidification and better clinical effect.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of three different wetting liquid supply modes for noninvasive ventilation. MethodsNinety patients who accepted noninvasive ventilation between February and October 2014 were randomly divided into three groups with 30 in each. Patients in group A underwent humidification with traditional kettle water; those in group B received humidification by one-time automatic water supplying; and patients in group C received continuous infusion to add water for humidification. The wetting effect and humidification related situations among the three groups of patients were compared and analyzed. ResultsThere were statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of wetting effect, comfort degree, water renewal cycle, working time and economic cost (P<0.05). Good wetting rate of group C was superior to group A and B (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between group A and B (P>0.05). Humidification comfort degree of group C was obviously higher than that in group A and B (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between group A and B (P>0.05). Water renewal cycle and working time of group C were significantly shorter than those in group A and B (P<0.05). At the same time, economic cost of group A and C was significantly less than that of group B (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between group A and C (P>0.05). ConclusionThe kind of continuous infusion for humidification in noninvasive ventilation has a good therapeutic effect for patients receiving airway wetting therapy, which is worthy of clinical popularization and application.
ObjectiveTo design a ventilator humidifier that can ensure water level and infuse fluid automatically, and evaluate its application effect in patients with mechanical ventilation.MethodsThirty-eight patients who received mechanical ventilation in ICU from March to June in 2019 were included. According to the order of admission, they were divided into a study group with 18 patients and a control group with 20 patients. Different ventilator humidifiers were used. The study group used self-designed ventilator humidifier, and the control group used the MR370 humidifier. The cases of sputum viscosity with Ⅲ degree after 48 hours’ mechanical ventilation, the times of fluid infusion and the total amount of fluid infusion were compared. The times of pouring out condensate water and the total amount of pouring out condensate water in 24 hours were also compared.ResultsThe times of infusing liquid in the study group in 24 hours was less than that in the control group (3.3±0.5 vs. 11.2±1.7, P<0.01), but the other indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups (all P>0.05).ConclusionsThe self-designed ventilator humidifier can be used for patients with mechanical ventilation, which can keep the water level at the water line all the time and is beneficial to humidification treatment. It can reduce the times of fluid infusion and nurses' workload.