Objectives To construct patient trust evaluation index system based on the background of hierarchical medical system, and to provide reference for the evaluation of the degree of patient trust on medical institutions and offer guidence to the implementation and further improvement of the hierarchical medical policy in China. Methods Based on literature review, the modified Delphi method was used to carry out 2 rounds of expert consultations from 11 experts in different fields to determine the indicators of patient trust evaluation index system. Results Questionnaire recovery rates of 2 rounds were 100.00% and 90.91%, the expert authority coefficient was greater than 0.75, the coefficient of variation of each index was less than 0.25, and the coordination coefficient of experts in the total index were 0.236 and 0.424 (P<0.001). Patient trust evaluation index system was preliminary constructed including medical environment, service trust, technical skills, pharmaceutical and equipment, the overall trust 5 first-level indexes and 20 level two indexes. Conclusions The patient trust evaluation index system can be used to evaluate patients' trust in different levels of medical institutions under the hierarchical medical system.
ObjectiveTo establish an evaluation index system suitable for key medical disciplines/specialties in Sichuan Province, with the coverage of tertiary-level comprehensive and tertiary specialty hospitals, and the provincial medical key disciplines/specialties as the starting point, so as to promote the development of key medical disciplines in Sichuan Province.MethodsThe literature method, expert meeting method, Delphi method, and analytic hierarchy process were used to establish the index system and the corresponding weights of each index.ResultsAn evaluation index system for the influence ranking of key medical disciplines/specialties in Sichuan Province was established, covering scientific and technological inputs and outputs, clinical services, and industry influence. The entire evaluation index system included 3 first-level indicators, 8 second-level indicators, 19 third-level indicators and corresponding weights.ConclusionThis evaluation index system has applied to rank the influence of key medical disciplines/specialties in Sichuan Province, laying a solid foundation for the influence evaluation of the key medical disciplines/specialties and the future platform construction in Sichuan Province.
ObjectiveTo construct a health in all policies (HiAP) evaluation index system for earthquake-stricken areas based on national health policies.MethodsFrom April to December 2020, this study combined the methods of comprehensive review of relevant literature, on the foundation of the evaluation indicators pool was preliminarily constructed. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were adopted to construct the evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas and analyzed the weights of indicators.ResultsA total of 5 first-level indicators (investment, action, short-term effect, medium-term effect, long-term effect), 15 second-level indicators, and 44 third-level indicators with satisfactory logical consistency of HiAP evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas had been constructed.ConclusionsThe HiAP evaluation indicators system constructed in this study can be used to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of HiAP earthquake-stricken areas.
ObjectivesTo use the Delphi method to preliminarily perfect the comprehensive evaluation index system which had been initially constructed by systematic review processes of diabetes food for special medical purposes (FSMP).MethodsThree rounds of expert consultation by Delphi method were compared to define indices held in the evidence-based comprehensive evaluation index system of diabetes FSMP and ways to distinguish effects.ResultsThe preliminary perfect index system after 3 rounds of expert consultation contained 4 primary directory indicators, 15 secondary directory indicators, and 20 tertiary indicators. Among them, the end index which could directly be used for evaluation contained a total of 27 indicators.ConclusionsThe index system is categorized into 4 segments of parameters, which are medical, nutritional, safety and other indices, which has addressed the problem posed by CFDA documents on how to scientifically validate the medical effect and safety of FSMP. It provides great significance to assess and supervise FSMP prior to and after it goes to public, assess characteristics and advantages of MNT, and improves nutrition economy and its social benefits.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the research status of competency evaluation systems of residents in China. MethodsThe CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect relevant literature on competency evaluation systems for residents in China from inception to December 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The descriptive analysis was then performed. ResultsA total of 15 literature were included. There were 9 index construction methods involved in the included studies, the Delphi method was the most widely used (7 papers, 46.7%), followed by the questionnaire method (3 papers, 20%) and the expert consultation method (2 papers, 13.3%). The most common reference model was the ACGME Milestones (10 articles, 66.7%). According to the construction of index systems, the number of first-level indicators was at least 4 and at most 8. The minimum number of entries (number of final grading indicators) was 15 and the maximum number was 116. The index systems included in the research had a wide range of contents, covering all aspects of resident competencies. The expert teams consisted of clinical experts, nurses, administrators, college teachers, patients, residents, etc. ConclusionThere are various research methods for the competency evaluation systems of residents in China, and the research content is in line with international standards.