Objective To discuss and evaluate the value of insertion of inferior vena cava filter in treating lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods Inferior vena cava filters were placed in 46 patients with lower extremity DVT prior treatment, 20 in which were treated by therapy with anticoagulation and thrombolysis, and therapy with pressure gradient, and the other 26 patients by operation and thrombolysis therapy, and therapy with pressure gradient. Whether patients occurred pulmonary embolism was observed and the form and site of filters were monitored by periodic fluoroscopy. Results Inferior vena cava filters were placed successfully in all patients, 38 cases were implanted permanence inferior vena cava filter, 8 cases were implanted temporary inferior vena cava filter. Symptoms and signs of DVT disappeared or remitted in 44/46 patients after treatment. None of pulmonary embolism was occurred. Follow up 2-24 months (average 13 months) for 36 cases with permanence inferior vena cava filter, there was no complication of the filter and pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusions The method of inserting inferior vena cava filter is simple and safe, which can prevent pulmonary embolism effectually to offer sufficient safeguard for the treatment of DVT.
ObjectiveTo assess the therapeutic effect of catheter thrombolysis combined with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) complicated with floating IVC thrombus. MethodsThe clinical data of 16 patients with DVT complicated with floating IVC thrombus from July 2013 to November 2014 in this hospital were collected. These patients were treated with the catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement, the IVC filter was placed via jugular vein, the catheter thrombolysis was performed by the side of the small saphenous vein, the amount of urokinase was (60-80) ×104 U/d. Results①The floating IVC thrombi of 13 patients were disappeared following catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement therapy, a small amount of visible thrombi were adhered on the recycled IVC filter, the lower limb swelling was relieved, the IVC could effectively open.②The IVC filters of 2 patients could not be recycled due to the adhesion of floating IVC thrombus and lumen of IVC resulting in luminal stenosis.③The floating IVC thrombus of 1 patient was disappeared, the IVC filter could not be recy-cled due to a large of thrombi adhered on the IVC filter. The lower limb swelling was slowly relieved. The complications such as severe pulmonary embolism didn't happen in all the patients during treatment and following-up. ConclusionThe limited data preliminarily shows that it is an effective and safe method by catheter thrombolysis combined with IVC filter placement in treatment of DVT complicated with floating IVC thrombus.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis (ADVT) in lower extremity. MethodsLimb circumference at 15 cm above and below the knee at affected side, as well as patency improvement score of 46 patients with ADVT in lower extremity, who received treatment in The Rocket Army General Hospital of PLA between January 2014 and October 2015, were colleted retrospectively, to analyze the effect of CDT in treatment of ADVT in lower extremity. ResultsAll patients were placed catheter successfully, 5 patients were placed catheter by 'contralateral mountain' technique retrograde, 40 patients were placed catheter through the limb popliteal vein at affected side anterograde, guiding by ultrasound, 1 patient was placed catheter through femoral vein at affected side. All of 46 patients got successful thrombolysis, and thrombolysis time was (4.7±1.8) d (3-12 d). There were 8 patients suffered from complications in different situation, and got treatment of drug withdrawal or tube drawing all ease, no one died. Compared with before CDT treatment in same group, the limb circumference at 15 cm above (P=0.028, P=0.017, P=0.031) and below (P=0.035, P=0.038, P=0.047) the knee at affected side, and patency improvement score (P=0.023, P=0.028, P=0.031) in all patients group, 22-45 years group, and 46-74 years group were all lower after CDT treatment. The limb circumference at 15 cm above (P=0.073, P=0.387, P=0.358) and below (P=0.416, P=0.625, P=0.253) the knee at affected side after CDT treatment were not differed with corresponding indexes of healthy side in the same group of all patients group, 22-45 years group, and 46-74 years group. Ultrasound after treatment showed that, blood vessel recanalization occurred in 15 patients (32.6%), partial blood vessel recanalization occurred in 28 patients (60.9%), but thrombus of 3 patients (6.5%) didn't removed, the total effective rate was 93.5% (43/46). Forty three patients were followed up for 1-24 months, the median is 18-month. During follow-up period, skin color obviously deepened after the activity occurred in 5 patients, obvious limb acid bilges occurred in 19 patients, vein thrombosis (DVT) recurred in 9 patients of 28 patients with partial blood vessel recanalization, in addition, thrombosis syndrome (PTS) occurred in 11 patients. ConclusionCDT is the most direct and effective way to treat ADVT.
Objective To explorer the application value of the inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) implantation in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Clinical data of 265 inpatients with PE admitted from November 2014 to November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an IVCF treatment group (55 cases) and an anticoagulant therapy group (210 cases) according to treatment measure. All patients were followed up for 3 months to 2 years through regular review. The one-year PE and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) recurrence rates, one-year mortality and two-year mortality were compared between two groups. Results The PE and DVT recurrence rates were 9.1% and 21.8% in the IVCF treatment group, and were 18.6% and 11.0% in the anticoagulant therapy group, respectively. The PE recurrence rate was lower and the DVT recurrence rate was higher in the IVCF treatment group compared with the anticoagulant therapy group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The one-year mortality (29.1% vs. 12.9%) and two-year mortality (34.5% vs. 14.8%) were significantly higher in the IVCF treatment group than those in the anticoagulant therapy group (P<0.05). Conclusions IVCF without anticoagulation can reduce incidence of pulmonary embolism caused by the lower extremity DVT, but will increase DVT recurrence rate. It may be an alternative option for prevention of PE in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy or recurrent PE patients after regular anticoagulant therapy.