west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Interbody fusion cage" 2 results
  • LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS MANAGEMENT USING EXPANDABLE PEDICLE SCREW AND INTERBODY FUSION CAGE

    Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of expandable pedicle screw (EPS) combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From June 2004 to March 2008, 23 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesiswere treated, including 9 males and 14 females aged 24-72 years old (average 48.7 years old). The course of the disease varied from 6 months to 6 years (average 30.4 months). There were 18 cases of degenerative spondylol isthesis and 5 of isthmic spondylolisthesis, including 1 case at L3,4 level, 14 at L4,5 level, and 8 at L5 and S1 levels. There were 17 cases of grade I, 4 of grade II, and 2 of grade III (including 1 case of recurrent L5 spondylolysis) according to Meyerding classification system. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed using 48 PLIVIOS interbody fusion cages, and spondylolisthesis reduction and internal fixation were conducted using 84 pieces of EPS. The indications for use of EPS were initial operation with bone mass reduction or osteoporosis, reoperation of previous pedicle instrumentation, intraoperative screw relocation, sacral anchoring, and construct reinforcement. Cl inical outcomes, radiographic reduction of spondylol isthesis and bone fusion of lumbar interbody were evaluated based on JOA score, Boxall index, and Cook criteria. Results The incision healed by first intension in all cases except for one revision case that suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and obtained delayed-healing without infection 23 days after operation using conservative treatment. No operative compl ications such as nerve and organ injuries were found.All cases were followed up for 12-39 months (average 17.8 months). X-ray exams of spine AP, lateral, fully extended position and fully flexed position view showed all 84 EPS were fully expanded within vertebral body. The improvement rate of JOA at the final follow-up visit was markedly effective in 14 cases, and effective in 5 cases, and noneffective in 4 cases, with a total effective rate of 82.61%. Anatomic reduction was achieved in 14 cases, improvement was obtained in 6 cases, no improvement was observed in 3 cases, and the reduction rate was 86.69%. Lumber interbody fusion was achieved in 20 cases, fixation was achieved in 2 cases, failure was observed in 1 cases, and the fusion rate was 86.69%. Conclusion EPS in complex with interbody fusion cage provides effective reduction, internal fixation and interbody fusion for the reconstruction of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS TREATED BY THREE DIFFERENT MATERIALS

    Objective To evluate the clinical outcome of autograftsof ilium and interbody fusion cage or bone morphogenetic protein(BMP)/artificial bone material/ cage in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 1997 to January 2004,114 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation. There were 45 males and 69 females with an average age of 43 years ranging from 32 to 61 years. Of 114patients, 85 cases were classified as degree Ⅰ, 24 cases as degree Ⅱ and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. The patients were divided into three groups accordingto the material used for interbody fusion: autografts of ilium (group A, n=42), interbody fusion cages(group B, n=36), and BMP/artificial bone material/ cage (group C, n=36).The clinical and radiographic results of the patients were compared among three groups. Results All patients were followed from 13 to 30 months with an average of 15 months. There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, blood loss, and disc space height of preoperation(P>0.05) among three groups. No severe complication occurred in the three groups(P>0.05). The excellent and good rates in groups A,B and C were 81.0%, 80.6%, and 83.3% respectively, showing no statisticallysignificant difference(P>0.05).The fusion rate of group C(97.0%) was significantly higher than those of group A(81.0%) and group B(83.3%) (P<0.05) after 1 year of operation.And the average loss of disc space height in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in group A(P<0.05). Conclusion Higher fusion rate and lower loss of disc space height can beobtained in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with BMP/artificial bone materiel.It is an effective method in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:22 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content