ObjectiveTo introduce the surgery method to reset and fix tibial plateau fracture without opening joint capsule, and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this method. MethodsBetween July 2011 and July 2013, 51 patients with tibial plateau fracture accorded with the inclusion criteria were included. All of 51 patients, 17 cases underwent open reduction and internal fixation without opening joint capsule in trial group, and 34 cases underwent traditional surgery method in control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to admission, side of injury, and types of fracture between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, incision heal ing, and fracture healing were compared between 2 groups. The tibial-femoral angle and collapse of joint surface were measured on X-ray film. At last follow-up, joint function was evaluated with Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee function scale. ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss in trial group was significantly less than that in control group (P<0.05). The incision length in trial group was significantly shorter than that in control group (P<0.05). Difference was not significant in operation time and the rate of incision heal ing between 2 groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 20.4 months) in trial group and 12-31 months (mean, 18.2 months) in control group. X-ray films indicated that all cases in 2 groups obtained fracture heal ing; there was no significant difference in the fracture healing time between 2 groups (t=1.382, P=0.173). On X-ray films, difference was not significant in tibial-femoral angle and collapse of joint surface between 2 groups (P>0.05). HSS score of the knee in trial group was significantly higher than that of control group (t=3.161, P=0.003). ConclusionIt can reduce the intraoperative blood loss and shorten the incision length to use open reduction and internal fixation without opening joint capsule for tibial plateau fracture. Traction of joint capsule is helpful in the reduction and good recovery of joint surface collapse. In addition, the surgery without opening joint capsule can avoid joint stiffness and obtain better joint function.
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of a new anterolateral approach of distal femur in the treatment of type C distal femoral fractures by comparing with traditional lateral and anterolateral approaches. MethodsThe clinical data of 51 patients with type C distal femoral fractures treated between January 2008 and August 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Of 51 patients, 24 patients received the new anterolateral approach of distal femur combined with fixation of condylar buttress plate (modified group), and 27 patients underwent traditional lateral or anterolateral approach combined with fixation of condylar buttress plate (traditional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification, side, fracture type, complication, and the time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores of the knee at 3, 6, and 12 months were recorded. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed and the incision healed by first intention in all patients. The operation time and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy of modified group were significantly less than those of traditional group (P<0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization time showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-37 months (mean, 21.3 months). X-ray films showed all fractures were union. The fracture healing time was (12.92±2.24) weeks in the modified group and (13.24±2.52) weeks in the traditional group, showing no significant difference (t=0.476, P=0.637). The knee HSS scores of modified group were significantly higher than those of traditional group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of knee varus or valgus, leg length discrepancy, internal fixator loosening, flexing dysfunction of knee, traumatic arthritis of knee, and total complications between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComparing with traditional lateral and anterolateral approaches, using the new anterolateral approach to treat type C distal femoral fractures has the advantages of less damage to soft tissue, excellent exposure, less operation time, and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and better postoperative rehabilitation of knee joint.
This study aims to analyze the biomechanical stability of Magic screw in the treatment of acetabular posterior column fractures by finite element analysis. A three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvis was established based on the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of a volunteer and its effectiveness was verified. Then, the posterior column fracture model of the acetabulum was generated. The biomechanical stability of the four internal fixation models was compared. The 500 N force was applied to the upper surface of the sacrum to simulate human gravity. The maximum implant stresses of retrograde screw fixation, single-plate fixation, double-plate fixation and Magic screw fixation model in standing and sitting position were as follows: 114.10, 113.40 MPa; 58.93, 55.72 MPa; 58.76, 47.47 MPa; and 24.36, 27.50 MPa, respectively. The maximum stresses at the fracture end were as follows: 72.71, 70.51 MPa; 48.18, 22.80 MPa; 52.38, 27.14 MPa; and 34.05, 30.78 MPa, respectively. The fracture end displacement of the retrograde tension screw fixation model was the largest in both states, and the Magic screw had the smallest displacement variation in the standing state, but it was significantly higher than the two plate fixations in the sitting state. Magic screw can satisfy the biomechanical stability of posterior column fracture. Compared with traditional fixations, Magic screw has the advantages of more uniform stress distribution and less stress, and should be recommended.