Objective To investigate the research base and current understanding of the mechanism of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IR) to intrahepatic cholangiocytes after l iver transplantation, so as to identify the key points of the mechanism and provide references for cl inical practice. Methods We searched PubMed (1970 to 2007) and CBM(1979 to 2007). Qual ity assessment and data collection were performed by two reviewers independently. Since the baseline supplied and the measure were very different, we decided to provide a descriptive summary only. Results The earliest study on liver IR was publ ished in 1970. A total of 65 papers were included. There were 13 on cl inical studies, 35 on basic research studies; and 17 review articles. Most basic studies focus on injury mechanism: ① The physiology of bile ducts and Intrahepatic Bil iary Duct Cells(IBDC); ②the IR caused injury mechanism of IBDC during or after liver transplantation; ③ the basic injury mechanisms include: cold ischemia, warm ischemia, reperfusion, injury of bile and bile salts. Most clinical studies focused on preventive measures, including surgical and non-surgical approaches. Based on the evidence from basic research, changing the composition and perfusion methods of perfusate and protecting the specific blood supply to biliary ducts and cholangiocytes during the operation were important in preventing or reducing such an injury. Conclusion ① The heterogeneity of morphology, function, status and the special blood supply in large and small IBDC are important material base. ② Our own study indicated that simple IR or H/R was able to change the expression of MHC, MIC, DR4, DR5 and other adhesion molecules. ③ Compared to hepatic cells, hIBDC can’ t resist cold ischemia and even worse in tolerating reperfusion injury. ④ Hydrophobic bile salts will could increase the harm to bile ducts during organ preservation. ⑤ Due to the low quantity and limited quantities of clinical researches, the power of evidence was low. The evaluation indexes and baseline conditions are not unified. So the conclusions are for reference only.