Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of external fixation versus intramedulllary nailing in the treatment of adult tibial shaft fracture. Methods We searched the specialized trials register of The Cochrane Collaboration’s Bone, Joint and Muscule Trauma Group, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006), EMBASE (1980 to March 2006) and PUBMED (1966 to March 2006). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedic journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials (quasi-RCTs) comparing external fixation versus intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults were included. The quality of these trials was critically assessed. We used the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 for data analyses. Result Three RCTs and two quasi-RCTs involving a total of 279 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that external fixation for tibial shaft fractures in adults may increase the infection rate [RR 2.45, 95%CI (1.31,4.61), P=0.005], and the malunion rate [RR 2.85, 95%CI (1.20,6.79), P=0.02] but may reduce the duration of hospitalization [RR –5.50, 95%CI (–6.99,–4.01)]. The nonunion rate, delayed healing rate, and healing time, were comparable between external fixation and intramedulllary nailing. Conclusion The trials available for this systematic review are too few and small for reliable estimates of the relative effects of external fixation and intramedulllary nailing. Further studies are needed to determine these effects , especially for patients who have GustiloШ C fractures.
Objective To describe a surgical device for closed reduction of tibial fracture and investigate its clinical effectiveness. Methods Between June 2010 and December 2012, 24 cases of tibial fractures were treated with intramedullary nailing using a surgical device for closed reduction. There were 18 males and 6 females with an average age of 40 years (range, 20-64 years). All fractures were closed. There were 3 proximal third fractures, 12 middle third fractures, and 9 distal third fractures. According to AO classification, 12 cases were classified as type A, 8 cases as type B, and 4 cases as type C. The mean time between injury and operation was 3 days (range, 1-12 days). The intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency to confirm closed reduction and guide wire passing the fracture site, and the duration between fracture reduction and nail insertion were recorded. The injured limb alignment and fracture angular deformity were measured as described by Freedman et al. The fuction of affected limb was estimated by Johner-Wruhs criteria. Results Closed reduction was successfully performed in 24 patients. The mean fluoroscopy frequency to confirm closed reduction was 3 (range, 2-5). The fluoroscopy frequency to confirm guide wire passing the fracture site was 2. The mean duration between fracture reduction and nail insertion was 30 minutes (range, 20-42 minutes). No intraoperative or postoperative complication occurred, such as infection, vessel and nerve injuries. All incisions healed by first intention. Seventeen patients were followed up 6-16 months (mean, 10 months). Radiographic evidence showed that bridging callous was observed at 2-4 months (mean, 2.5 months). The injured limb alignment was normal on anteroposterial and lateral radiographs at 5 months postoperatively, no malalignment and obvious angular deformity was observed. The internal fixator had good position. According to Johner-Wruhs criteria for evaluation of the affected limb function, the results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 5 cases with an excellent and good rate of 100%. Conclusion The surgical device for closed reduction of tibial fracture is simple and easy to use, and has good effectiveness combined with intramedullary nailing.
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated cement temporary spacer for osteomyel itis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary fixation. Methods Between June 2002 and May 2006, 12 patients with chronic osteomyel itis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary nail ing were treated, including 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 40.2 years (range, 26-53 years). The fracture locations included tibia in 7 cases and femur in 5cases. Infection occurred within 2 weeks after intramedullary fixation in 7 cases and within 3 months in 5 cases. The mean time from infection to admission was 5 months (range, 1-24 months). The results of bacteria culture were positive in 10 cases and negative in 2 cases. White blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were higher than normal values. An antibiotic-impregnated cement temporary spacer was inserted after removal of biomembrane and internal fixator, thorough debridement and irrigation. After osteomyel itis was controlled by antibiotic therapy postoperatively, two-stage bone transplantation and internal fixation were performed after 3 to 6 months. Results All wounds healed by first intention without early compl ication. All cases were followed up 24 to 48 months (mean, 34 months). WBC count, ESR, and CRP were normal at 3 months postoperatively. The X-ray films showed the fracture heal ing at 10-14 weeks after operation (mean, 12 weeks). Expect one patient had knee range of motion of 90°, the lower l imb function of the others returned to normal. No infection recurred during follow-up. Conclusion Antibiotic-impregnated cement temporary spacer could control osteomyelitis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary nail ing, and two-stage bone transplantation and internal fixation after osteomyelitis is an effictive and ideal way to treat osteomyelitis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary nail ing.
Objective To compare the efficacy of plating versus intramedullary nailing in the treatment of adult humeral shaft fracture. Methods We identified eligible studies in PubMed (1950 to September 2007), MEDLINE (1950 to September 2007), OVID CINAHL (1950 to September 2007), OVID EBM (3rd Quarter 2007), CBMdisk (1978 to June 2007) and CNKI (1981 to June 2007). We also handsearched several Chinese orthopedic journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing plating versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture in adults were included and the quality of these trials was critically assessed. Data analyses were conducted with Stata 10.0. Results Six RCTs involving 425 patients were included, among which the statistical heterogeneity was not significant (Pgt;0.1). Cumulative meta-analyses showed that intramedullary nailing might increase the re-operation rate in studies conducted before the year of 2000 (OR=0.39, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.90, P=0.03), but the difference was not significant in studies conducted after 2000 (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.08, P=0.08). Intramedullary nailing might increase the incidence of shoulder impingement compared with plating (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.65, P=0.01). The rates of non-union, deep infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury and internal fixation failure were similar between plating and intramedullary nailing. Meta-analyses were not conducted for union time, operation time and bleeding (transfusion) volume, because the relevant data were not available from the included trials. Conclusion Intramedullary nailing may increase the incidence of shoulder impingement. The rates of re-operation, non-union, deep infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury and internal fixation failure are similar between plating and intramedullary nailing. Further well-designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to determine the effects of plating and intramedullary nailing on these outcomes.
Objective To determine the efficacy and complication rate of intramedullary nailing versus compression plate in the treatment of adult humeral shaft fracture. Methods We searched the specialized trials register of The Cochrane Collaboration’s Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group, The Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), EMbase (1980 to 2006), PubMed (1966 to 2006), NRR (http://www.update-software.com/National/), CCT (http://www.controlled-trials.com) and CBMdisc (1979 to July 2006). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedic journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomize controlled trials comparing intramedullary nailing versus compression plate for humeral shaft fracture in adults were included and the quality of these trials was critically assessed. Data analyses were done using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8. Results Three randomize controlled trials involving 215 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that intramedullary nailing may increase the re-operation rate (OR=2.68, 95%CI 1.19 to 6.04, P=0.02), pain in the shoulder (OR=13.02, 95%CI 2.23 to 75.95, P=0.004), and the rate of decreased range of motion of the shoulder (OR=18.60, 95%CI 1.01 to 341.83, P=0.05). The rates of no union, infection and iatrogenic radial nerve injury were comparable between intramedullary nailing and compression plate. Meta-analysis was not conducted for the time of union, because the relevant data were not available for the included trials. Conclusions Further well-designed and large-scale randomize controlled trials are required to determine the effects of intramedullary nailing and compression plate on these outcomes, because the trials available for this systematic review are too few and too small.