west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Intratracheal instillation" 2 results
  • Comparison of Three Mouse Models of Acute Lung Injury Induced by Different Administration of Lipopolysaccharides

    Objective To compare three approaches of lipopolysaccharides ( LPS) administration for inducing acute lung injury ( ALI) in mice. Methods LPS ( 5 mg/kg) was intratracheally aerosol administered ( ITA group) , intratracheally instilled ( ITI group) , or intraperitoneally injected ( IPI group) to induce ALI in BLAB/ c mice. Evans Blue instead of LPS was intratracheally administered to observe the liquid distribution in the lungs. Two hours after LPS administration, the mice were sacrificed and the lungs were removed to determine wet-to-dry lung weight ratio ( W/D) , and the histological changes were evaluated by HE staining. Phosphorylation level of IκB-αand NF-κB p65 in lung tissue were investigated by Western blot. Transcription intensity of TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA in lung tissue were detected by real-time quantitative PCR. Results Evans Blue distributed more uniformly in the ITA group than the ITI group. The lung W/D ratio and histological changes score in three LPS administration groups were all significantly higher than the normal control group ( P lt;0. 01) , with the ITA group being the highest. The phosphorylation levels of IκB-αand NF-κB p65 were significantly higher in the ITA group than the ITI group ( P lt;0. 05) , and were significantly higher in the ITI group than the IPI group ( P lt; 0. 05) . Transcription intensity of TNF-αand IL-1βmRNA was significantly higher in the ITA group than the ITI group ( P lt;0. 05) , and were significantly higher in the ITI group than the IPI group ( P lt;0. 05) . Conclusion Being non-invasive and convenient,intratracheal LPS aerosol inhalation is an optimal method to induce ALI in mice because it induces more extensive and uniformly distributed injuries in lung.

    Release date:2016-09-13 03:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Intraperitoneal instillation versus intratracheal injection of lipopolysaccharide: differences in establishment of acute lung injury model

    ObjectiveTo compare two different ways to establish mouse model with acute lung injury (ALI) via intratracheal instillation or intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). MethodsBALB/c mice received intraperitoneal/intratracheal administration of LPS or sham operation. Wet/dry lung weight ratio, protein concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and lung tissue histology were examined at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48 h after LPS administration. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in BALF and serum was assayed with ELISA method. ResultsLPS treatment significantly increased wet/dry lung weight ratio, BALF protein concentration and TNF-α concentration in serum and BALF. Lung tissue was damaged after LPS challenge. The mice received LPS intraperitoneal injection got a more significant lung edema than those received LPS intratracheal instillation. Inversely, LPS intratracheal instillation induced more severed microstructure destruction. ConclusionsALI animal model by LPS intratracheal instillation or intraperitoneal injection induces inflammation and tissue damage in lung. However, the degree of tissue damage or self-healing induced by two methods is different. Therefore the decision of which way to establish ALI model will depend on the study purpose.

    Release date:2017-05-25 11:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content