Objective To compare the cl inical results between high-flexion and standard cruciate-stabling prostheses in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Methods Between August 2007 and January 2009, 98 patients (106 knees) underwent TKA with standard cruciate-stabl ing prostheses (standard group), and 46 patients (50 knees) underwent TKA with high-flexion prostheses (high-flexion group). In standard group, there were30 males (32 knees) and 68 females (74 knees) with an age of (70.0 ± 3.5) years, including 78 cases (82 knees) of osteoarthritis (OA) and 20 cases (24 knees) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a disease duration of (14.5 ± 3.3) years; the Hospital for Special Surgery Scoring System (HSS) and the range of motion (ROM) were 56.1 ± 21.6 and (89.0 ± 16.1)°, respectively. In high-flexion group, there were 8 males (10 knees) and 38 females (40 knees) with an age of (68.6 ± 8.9) years, including 44 cases (47 knees) of OA and 2 cases (3 knees) of RA with a disease duration of (13.9 ± 4.1) years; the HSS and ROM were 58.9 ± 25.3 and (91.0 ± 19.3)°, respectively. There was no significant difference in the general data (P gt; 0.05) between 2 groups, so the cl inical data of 2 groups had comparabil ity. Results In standard group, poor wound heal ing and persistent headache caused by cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 1 case, respectively. In high-flexion group, transient common peroneal nerve palsy occurred in 1 case. There was significant difference (P lt; 0.05) in the hospital ization expense between standard group [ (39 000 ± 6 000)] and highflexion goup [ (52 000 ± 8 000)]. The follow-up time was 12-26 months (18 months on average) in standard group (91 cases, 98 knees) and 11-19 months (13 months on average) in high-flexion group (44 cases, 47 knees). The SF-36 showed significant difference in role-physical score (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference in other 7 indices scores (P gt; 0.05). At the final follow-up, the ROM was (129.1 ± 19.2)° in high-flexion group and (123.6 ± 16.7)° in standard group; showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The HSS was 91.2 ± 17.6 in high-flexion group and 92.5 ± 14.5 in standard group; showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion After TKA, the ROM in high-flexion group is superior to that in standard group, but there is no obvious advantages in terms of the HSS and SF- 36 outcomes.
Objectives To compare the clinical therapeutic effect of arthroscope and mini-open in treating rotator cuff impairment with Meta-analysi. Methods We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (Jun 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CBM, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria: Randomized or comparative studies on all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and mini-open repairs. Results There were no randomized controlled trials (Level I) was found. Pooled results from all 12 trials showed that postoperative shoulder pain in all arthroscope group was statistically less than in the mini-open group (RR=0.94, 95%CI 0.28 to 1.60). Meanwhile, another evaluates outcomes such as ROM-Forward flexion (RR=0.17, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.45), patient’s satisfaction (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.08), complication (RR=1.11, 95%CI 0.54 to 2.27), and shoulder functional score (RR=0.04, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.19) indicated no statistical difference in two groups. Conclusions According to Limited evidence, there are some findings as follows: comparing with mini-open treatment of rotator cuff impairment, all arthroscopic surgery can reduce the shoulder pain. Moreover, we found no statistical difference in shoulder functional score, ROM-Forward flexion, patient’s satisfaction and complication. Attention should be paid to outcome assessment in future trials.