ObjectiveTo analyze the characteristics of colorectal cancer surgery in the current version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsThe DACCA version selected for this data analysis was the updated version on July 16th, 2020. The data items included operative duration, anatomy (anatomical difficulty), pelvis (pelvic stenosis), obesity (abdominal obesity), adhesion (adhesion in surgical area), mesentery (abnormal mesenteric status), hypertrophy (tissue hypertrophy or organ hypertrophy), intestinal quality, death (risk of death), injury (risk of tissue injury), recurrence (tumor recurrence), metastasis (tumor metastasis), anastomotic leakage (risk of anastomotic leakage), difficulty of operation, prognosis, quality of operation. The selected data items were statistically analyzed.ResultsThetotal number of medical records (data rows) that met the criteria was 6 116. Spearman correlation text showed a negative correlation between operative duration and years (rs=–0.433, P<0.001). In anatomy, pelvis, obesity, adhesion, mesentery, and hypertrophy, the most cases were “normal or basically normal”, and the percentages were 32.55%, 44.52%, 48.68%, 55.79%, 53.36%, and 57.72%, respectively. In quality of intestinal, the highest proportion was “bad” (43.25%). In risk of death, risk of tissue injury, and tumor recurrence, the most cases were “very small”, and the percentages were 69.00%, 94.41%, and 68.21%, respectively. In tumor metastasis, risk of anastomotic leakage, difficulty of operation, prognosis, and quality of operation, the highest proportion were “small” (48.58%), “average” (49.25%), “average” (32.96%), “uncertain” (45.65%), and “very good” (39.85%).ConclusionsIn the DACCA, the intestinal quality is characteristic of difficulty in operation, and in the evaluation of operation quality, the judgment of anastomotic leakage deserves much more attention. However, the relationship between the difficulty of operation and postoperative effects, and the relationship between the quality of operation and the prognosis still need to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo describe the difficulties and quality evaluation of colorectal cancer surgical procedures in the West China Colorectal Cancer Database (DACCA).MethodWe used the form of text description.ResultsThe related content modules of DACCA operation in West China Hospital, included operator, operative duration, anatomy (anatomical difficulty), pelvis (pelvic stenosis), obesity (abdominal obesity), adhesion (adhesion in surgical area), mesentery (abnormal mesenteric status), hypertrophy (tissue hypertrophy or organ hypertrophy), intestinal quality, death (risk of death), injury (risk of tissue injury), recurrence (tumor recurrence), metastasis (tumor metastasis), anastomotic leakage (risk of anastomotic leakage), difficulty of operation, prognosis, and quality of operation, were elaborated. Then the surgical characteristics were detailed for their definition, label, structure, error correction, and update.ConclusionThrough detailed description and specification of surgical difficulties and quality evaluation of colorectal cancer in DACCA in West China Hospital, it can provide a reference for standardized treatment of colorectal cancer and also provide experiences for the peers who wish to build a colorectal cancer database.
ObjectiveTo explain in detail hospitalization process management of colorectal cancer as well as its tag and structure of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) in the West China Hospital.MethodThe article was described in the words.ResultsThe definition and setting of 8 classification items involved in the hospitalization process management from DACCA in the West China Hospital were set. The items were included the date of first out-patient meeting, admitted date, operative date, discharged date, waiting time before the admission, preoperative staying days, total hospital staying days, and manage protocol. The relevant data tag of each item and the structured way needed at the big data application stage were elaborated and the corrective precautions of classification items were described.ConclusionsBased on description about hospitalization process management from DACCA in West China Hospital, it is provided a clinical standard and guidance for analyzing of DACCA in West China Hospital in future. It also could provide enough experiences for construction of colorectal cancer database by staff from same occupation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of multicycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced rectal cancer through the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsA total of 173 patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgery after 2–4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with apatinib were selected from the DACCA (Version January 20, 2019). The patients were grouped by treated cycle and clinical TNM (cTNM) stage, and the overall variation of clinical and pathological indicators before and after treatment were compared.ResultsAmong 173 cases, 63 cases (36.42%), 45 cases (26.01%), and 65 cases (37.57%) were respectively in the 2, 3, and 4-cycle group; 54 cases (31.21%), 91 cases (52.60%), and 28 cases (16.18%) in stage Ⅱ, Ⅲ, and Ⅳ-group. Clinical response degree: complete pathologic response (cPR) was observed in 23 cases (13.29%), and the rate of conversion resection was 100% (173/173). Clinical response grade: complete response (CR) in 58 cases (33.53%), partial response (PR) in 93 cases (53.76%), stable disease (SD) in 21 cases (12.14%), progressive disease (PD) in 1 cases (0.58%). Tumor regression grade: TRG0 in 21 cases (12.57%), TRG1 in 22 cases (13.17%), TRG2 in 84 cases (50.30%), TRG3 in 40 cases (23.95%). There was a statistical difference in CEA before and after the treatment (P<0.001). All cases underwent radical resection, and the successful rate of transformed resection was 100%. There was significant difference on the clinical response grade among the cases of different treatment cycle (H=18.513, P<0.001), and the longer treatment cycle was correlated with better clinical response (G=–0.474, P<0.001). In addition, there was significant difference on the cPR rate among the cases of different cTNM stage (χ2=6.450, P=0.040).ConclusionsMulticycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with apatinib in treating patients with advanced rectal cancer is efficient. More treatment cycles lead to better efficacy. The lower cTNM stage maybe means more chance of achieving cPR and a satisfactory rate of conversion resection.