Objective To explore the pathogenesis of the level of gene and therapeutic target genes associated with intestinal obstruction by analyzing the differential expression gene. Methods The gene expression data that came from public database gene expression omnibus （GEO） which provided adhesion formation’ gene expression data on 1， 3， 7，and 14 days after operation （n=8） and normal intestinal tissues’ gene expression data （n=2） of mouse were collected. The gene function and differential expression of genes were analyzed by using gene ontology （GO） and significance analysis of microarray （SAM）. Results There were a lot of response stimulated up-regulation of gene expression when occurrence of adhesion， and the products of these genes were distributed on cell membrane. The analysis results of gene expression at different time point after operation showed that expression up-regulated of Hmgcs 2 gene occurred on 3-14 days ofter operation and expression up-regulated of Stxbp 5 gene occurred on 14 days ofter operation. Conclusions The adhesion formation may be closely associated with the genes of response to stimulus and the gene product in membrane. The Hmgcs 2 and Stxbp 5 genes may be closely associated with the occurrence of other diseases which induced by adhesion formation.This provides a basis for the discovery of potential therapeutic targets.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of robotic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for rectal cancer.MethodsA literature search was performed using the China biomedical literature database, Chinese CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The retrieval time was from the establishment of databases to April 1, 2019. Related interest indicators were brought into meta-analysis by Review Manager 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 510 patients were included in 5 studies, including 273 patients in the robot group and 237 patients in the laparoscopic group. As compared to the laparoscopic group, the robot group had significantly longer operative time [MD=43.27, 95%CI (16.48, 70.07), P=0.002], less blood loss [MD=–19.98.27, 95%CI (–33.14, –6.81), P=0.003], lower conversion rate [MD=0.20, 95%CI (0.04, –0.95), P=0.04], less lymph node harvest [MD=–1.71, 95%CI (–3.21, –0.21), P=0.03] and shorter hospital stay [MD=–1.61, 95%CI (–2.26, –0.97), P<0.000 01]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the first flatus [MD=–0.01, 95%CI (–0.48, 0.46), P=0.96], time to diet [MD=–0.20, 95%CI (–0.67, 0.27), P=0.41], incidence of complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.50, 1.14), P=0.18], distal resection margin [MD=0.00, 95%CI (–0.17, 0.17), P=0.98] and positive rate of circumferential resection margin [OR=0.61, 95%CI (0.27, 1.37), P=0.23].ConclusionsRobotic and laparoscopic ISR for rectal cancer shows comparable perioperative outcomes. Compared with laparoscopic ISR, robotic ISR has the advantages of less blood loss, lower conversion rate, and longer operation times. These findings suggest that robotic ISR is a safe and effective technique for treating low rectal cancer.