目的：研究中药当归芍药散对外周血T淋巴细胞转录因子GATA-3和T-bet mRNA表达的影响，初步探讨其用于治疗不明原因反复自然流产的可能性。方法：体外分离提取11例志愿者外周血单核细胞，在含有或不含当归芍药散的培养液中培养24h，用实时定量PCR技术检测GATA-3和T-bet mRNA的表达。结果：用10 μg/mL浓度当归芍药散处理后,单核细胞中GATA-3 mRNA的含量与对照组比较显著增高（P＜0.05)。当归芍药散处理细胞后，T-bet mRNA的表达水平呈降低趋势，当浓度为100 μg/mL时，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05)。结论：当归芍药散可上调转录因子GATA-3 mRNA的表达或下调T-bet mRNA的表达,从而可能通过调节Th2/Th1平衡向Th2偏移、对于Th1反应异常增强的不明原因反复自然流产有一定的治疗潜能。
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for subfertility. Method Databases used including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CCTR). Potentially related trials in reference lists of studies were hand searched. Published RCTs in any languages and length whether they were blind or unblind, were included. Treatments were Chinese medicinal herbs (single or compound), and controls were placebo, standard medical intervention, or no intervention. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and analyzed with Revman 4.2 softeware. Results 7 randomized trials, including 1 042 patients met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of all trials was poor. Chinese medicinal herbs were effective compared with routine antibiotics [RR 1.49, 95％CI (1.37 to1.62), Plt;0.000 01] and resulted in higher pregnancy rate [RR 1.46, 95%CI (1.09 to,1.96), P=0.01]. There were no adverse events reported in treatment group. Conclusions Some Chinese medicinal herbs may be effective for subfertility. However, the evidence is too weak to draw a conclusion. More strictly designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are required.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of Chinese medicinal herbs for female immune-caused subfertility. Methods Databases included: MEDLINE (1966-2002.2), EMBASE (1984-2002.2), CBM (1978-2002.2) and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, CCTR (Issue 1, 2002). Reference lists of trials were handsearched. Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) whether blind or unblind, any languages and length of follow up were included. Treatments included Chinese medicinal herbs (single or compound). Controls were placebo and western medicine, or no intervention. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and analyzed with Revman 4.2. Results Six RCTs were included, all of which were poor in methodological quality. Because of different therapies in the treatment and control groups, we did not perform meta-analysis. The No.1 anti-immune tablet was more effective than corticosteroid plus condom during intercourse both in the pregnancy rate (RR 3.75, 95%CI 1.61 to 8.75, P=0.002) and AsAb negative rate (RR 1.66, 95%CI 1.23 to 2.22, P=0.000 8). Bushen Xiezhuo Soup was more effective than antibiotic in the pregnancy rate (RR 2.97, 95%CI 1.60 to 5.50, P=0.000 6) and antisperm antibody (AsAb) negative rate (RR 2.33, 95%CI 1.54 to 3.54, Plt;0.000 1)。Zhenqi Zhuanyin Soup was as effective as IUI in pregnancy rate (RR 1.80, 95%CI 0.58 to 5.60, P＝0.31) but more effective than IUI in AsAb negative conversion rate (RR 9.61, 95%CI 3.22 to 28.67, Plt;0.000 1), Zhenqi Zhuanyin Soup combined with IUI was more effective than IUI in pregnancy rate (RR 3.60, 95%CI 1.32 to 9.85,P=0.01) and AsAb negative rate (RR 8.92, 95%CI 2.98 to 26.75, Plt;0.000 1). Conclusions Some Chinese medicinal herbs may work well in subfertility treatment. However, the evidence is too weak to draw a conclusion for there are deficiencies in strict randomization, blinding and follow-up.More strictly designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are required.
目的 探讨3种不同助孕方案在≥40岁妇女体外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）周期中的临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析2010年8月－2012年2月期间，于四川大学华西第二医院生殖中心行IVF-ET助孕、年龄≥40岁妇女共245个周期的临床资料，排除一侧卵巢缺如患者3例，余242个周期根据助孕方案不同分为3组：拮抗剂组（GnRH-A方案组）44个周期、长方案组109个周期及短方案组89个周期，比较3种方式助孕的临床效果。 结果 3组均无早发黄体生成素峰；长方案组应用促性腺激素（Gn）的时间最长，应用Gn数量最多，获得最高的获卵数及获胚数（P＜0.05）；3组的受精率、优胚率、冷冻胚胎数、周期取消率、卵巢过度刺激综合征发生率、早期流产率均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），短方案组的种植率及临床妊娠率最低（P＜0.05）。 结论 GnRH-a长方案在≥40岁妇女的IVF-ET周期中具有较好的临床结局，在≥40岁妇女IVF-ET周期中具有与长方案相似的结局，并且可以减少Gn使用量，提高卵泡及胚胎质量，短方案组对≥40岁妇女临床效果较差。
【摘要】 目的 探讨各种不同体外受精（IVF）助孕方案对子宫腺肌病伴不孕症患者的疗效。 方法 对2006年1月-2009年6月进行IVF助孕治疗的子宫腺肌病伴不孕症患者63例的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据是否应用长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂（GnRH-a）及启动促性腺激素（Gn）时间分为超长方案、长效GnRH-a后长或短方案、常规长方案3组，对IVF助孕疗效进行分析。 结果 3种治疗方案的Gn刺激天数、Gn总量、获卵数、不良反应发生率和流产率比较无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）；3种治疗方案的周期取消率为20.0%、7.7%、30.0%，比较有统计学意义（χ2=5.74，Plt;0.05），方案2的周期取消率低于方案1和方案3，有统计学意义（χ2=7.21，Plt;0.05）；3种治疗方案的继续妊娠率为23.0%、37.0%、15.3%，有统计学意义（χ2=11.31，Plt;0.05），方案2的继续妊娠率高于方案1和方案3，有统计学意义（χ2=8.52，Plt;0.05）。 结论 与超长方案和常规长方案相比，子宫腺肌病伴不孕症患者采用长效GnRH-a治疗后长方案或短方案行IVF助孕治疗，妊娠率升高，周期取消率降低。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of different in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment protocols on infertile women with adenomyosis. Methods Sixty-four infertile women with adenomyosis who had IVF treatment cycles from January 2006 to June 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. According to administration of long course gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and the start time of gonadotropin (Gn), all participants were divided into three groups: the first group with ultra-long term protocol, the second group with long or short term protocol after administration of long course GnRH-a and the third group with routine long term protocol. Results There were no differences among the three groups with regard to days of Gn administration, amounts of Gn administration, numbers of retrieved oocytes, prevalence of poor response and miscarriage (Pgt;0.05). The cancelation rates of the three groups were 20.0%、7.7% and 30.0% respectively. There were significant differences in cancelation rates among the groups (χ2=5.74, Plt;0.05), and the cancelation rate in the second group was significantly lower than the other groups (χ2=7.21, Plt;0.05). The ongoing pregnancy rates of the groups were 23.0%、37.0% and 15.3% respectively. There were significant differences in ongoing pregnancy rates among three groups (χ2=11.31, Plt;0.05), and the ongoing pregnancy rate in the second group was significantly higher than the other groups (χ2=8.52, Plt;0.05). Conclusion Compared with the ultra-long term and routine long term protocol of IVF treatment in infertile woman with adenomyosis, the ongoing pregnancy rate might be higher and the cancelation rate might be lower in the long or short term protocol after administration of long course GnRH-a.