Objective?To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 HT-3 receptor inhibitor tropisetron injected in the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia. Methods?We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about tropisetron in preventing PONV after general anesthesia from January 1995 to September 2009. We also consulted references of the included studies for omission. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed and data were extracted according to the standard of the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1. The meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results?A total of 17 RCTs involving 4 678 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: (1) Efficacy: tropisetron injected could decrease the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.60), and decrease the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia with opioid drugs in patient controlled analgesia (RR=0.30, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.60); tropistron injected once or more could decrease the incidence of PONV in combination of PCA with tramadol (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.56; RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.19); and tropisetron combined with dexamethasome could also lessen the incidence of PONV (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.57). (2) Safety: Tropisetron injected could lessen the incidence of postoperative headache and dizziness (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.75), but could not significantly decrease the pruritus and somnolence. Conclusion?Tropisetron injected can significantly decrease the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia, and it will not increase the adverse effect and the incidence of postoperative complications. Furthermore, it has also the advantage of decreasing postoperative headache and dizziness.
Objective To evaluate the cardiac protection function of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (HTEA) for patients with acute coronary syndrome or heart failure. Methods A literature search was conducted with computerized database on PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI from 1990 to May 2010. Further searches for articles were conducted by checking all references describing cardiac protection studies with HTEA. All included articles were assessed and data were extracted according to the standard of Cochrane review. The homogeneous studies were pooled using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 28 articles involving 1 041 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that, a) cardiac function: HTEA could significantly improve ejection fraction of left ventricle (WMD= – 10.28, 95%CI – 14.14 to – 6.43) and cardiac output (WMD= – 1.26, 95%CI – 1.63 to – 0.89), contract left ventricular diastolic dimension (WMD= 5.02, 95%CI 3.72 to 6.32), increase E peak (WMD= – 17.50, 95%CI – 29.40 to – 5.59) and decrease A peak (WMD= 27.36, 95%CI 24.46 to 30.26); b) ischemic degree for patients with heart failure: the change of NST-T (WMD= 1.45, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.78) and ∑ST-T (WMD= 1.02, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.26) got significantly decreased after HTEA; c) ischemic degree for patients with acute coronary syndrome: HTEA could obviously lessen the times (WMD= 4.24, 95%CI 0.48 to 8.00) and duration (WMD= 23.29, 95%CI 4.66 to 42.11) of myocardial ischemia, decrease the times of heart attack (WMD= 3.44, 95%CI 0.92 to 5.97), and decrease the change of NST-T (WMD= 1.10, 95%CI 0.84 to 1.36) and ∑ST-T (WMD= 1.33, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.65); d) hemodynamic change for patients with acute coronary syndrome: HTEA could obviously decrease heart beat (WMD= 8.44, 95%CI 3.81 to 13.07) and systolic arterial pressure (WMD= 2.07, 95%CI 0.81 to 3.34), but not decrease the diastolic blood pressure (WMD= 2.06, 95%CI – 0.52 to 4.64) so as to avoid influencing the infusion of coronary artery; and e) influence on Q-T interval dispersion: HTEA could significantly decrease Q-Td (WMD= 9.51, 95%CI 4.74 to 14.27), Q-Tcd (WMD= 11.82, 95%CI 5.55 to 18.09), and J-Td (WMD= 9.04, 95%CI 2.30 to 15.79). Conclusions High thoracic epidural anesthesia can obviously improve the systolic and diastolic function of left ventricle, decrease the heart beat and stabilize hemodynamic change, lessen the times and duration for myocardial ischemia, reserve the ST segment change, contract Q-T interval dispersion, which has to be further proved with more high quality studies.
Objective?To systematically evaluate the effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods?We searched PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI databases from 1990 through Oct. 2009 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed and the data was extracted according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook. The homogeneous RCTs were pooled using RavMan 4.2.10 software. Results?Sixteen RCTs involving 1 316 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analyses showed that thoracic epidural anesthesia significantly reduced time to tracheal extubation (MD= –332.43, 95%CI –640.19 to –24.68, P=0.03), visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest on postoperation day 1 (MD= –1.23, 95%CI –2.19 to –0.27, P=0.01), VAS scores with movement on postoperation day 1 (MD= –2.52, 95%CI –4.65 to –0.39, P=0.02) and day 2 (MD= –1.5, 95%CI –2.56 to –0.43, P=0.006), and incidences of myocardial ischemia (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.97, P=0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative pulmonary function, incidences of myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and mortality. Conclusions?Thoracic epidural anesthesia could reduce postoperative time to tracheal extubation, VAS score, and incidences of myocardial ischemia, but it does not affect postoperative pulmonary function, incidences of myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and mortality. More high-quality RCTs are required.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of injected cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor for acute postoperative pain. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid and CNKI databases from 1999 through Jan. 2009 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor or parecoxib sodium for acute postoperative pain. The methodological quality of included RCTs were assessed, and the data was extracted by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Handbook. The homogeneous RCTs were pooled using RevMan software, and the non-homogeneous studies evaluted using descriptive qualitative analysis. Results Seven RCTs involving 1939 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analyses showed that: ① Efficacy: The comparison of PCA combined parecoxib sodium (successively injected less than 3 days) i.v. with PCA alone: after 24, 48, and 72 hours of the initial dose of parecoxib 40 mg i.v., the percentage of the patients’ global evaluation of study medication (PGESM) described effective (excellent and good) was higher than that of the control group [RR (95%CI) were 1.41 (1.13, 1.75), 1.25 (1.15, 1.35), and 1.30 (1.21, 1.40) respectively]; the percentage of the PGESM described ineffective (fair and poor) was lower than that of the control group [RR (95%CI) were 0.43 (0.26, 0.72), 0.44 (0.34, 0.57), and 0.33 (0.23, 0.48) respectively]. ② Safety: Combination of PCA with parecoxib sodium could lessen the incidence of postoperative fever (RR=0.34, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.53) and nausea and vomiting (RR=0.69, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.83), but not statistically decrease of respiratory depression (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.38 to 1.83), pruritus (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.52), and headache (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.28). Conclusion The combination of PCA with parecoxib sodium successively injected less than 3 days can significantly increase the scores of PGESM, and does not increase the incidence of adverse effects or postoperative complications, and also has the advantage of decreasing postoperative fever, nausea and vomiting.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in Post-extubation acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients. MethodsThe Domestic and foreign databases were searched for all published available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about HFNC therapy in post-extubation AECOPD patients. The experimental group was treated with HFNC, while the control group was treated with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The main outcome measurements included reintubation rate. The secondary outcomes measurements included oxygenation index after extubation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mortality, comfort score and adverse reaction rate. Meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software. ResultA total of 20 articles were enrolled. There were 1516 patients enrolled, with 754 patients in HFNC group, and 762 patients in control group. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant difference in reintubation rate [RR=1.41, 95%CI 0.97 - 2.07, P=0.08] and mortality [RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.58 - 1.44, P=0.69]. Compared with NIPPV, HFNC have advantages in 24 h oxygenation index after extubation [MD=4.66, 95%CI 0.26 - 9.05, P=0.04], length of ICU stay [High risk group: SMD –0.52, 95%CI –0.74 - –0.30; Medium and low risk group: MD –1.12, 95%CI –1.56- –0.67; P<0.00001], comfort score [MD=1.90, 95%CI 1.61 - 2.19, P<0.00001] and adverse reaction rate [RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.16 - 0.31, P<0.00001]. ConclusionsCompared with NIPPV, HFNC could improve oxygenation index after extubation, shorten the length of ICU stay, effectively improve Patient comfort, reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions and it did not increase the risk of reintubation and mortality. It is suggested that HFNC can be cautiously tried for sequential treatment of AECOPD patients after extubation, especially those who cannot tolerate NIPPV.