Nowadays, percutaneous pulmonary valve treatment is a hot topic in valvular heart disease, consisting of percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty and percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). The percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty is the prime intervention of pulmonary valve stenosis. The main indication of PPVI is pulmonary valve regurgitation and/or obstruction. PPVI is still the research focus, with the improvement of surgical indications and the development of surgical devices. However, compared with surgical pulmonary valve replacement, it still has limitations. This article reviews the treatment progress of percutaneous pulmonary valve treatment, especially PPVI.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficiency and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate-low risk compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).MethodsTwo researchers searched literatures independently in databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Internet, VIP database for studies published from January 2012 to October 2017, then screened for propriate studies, collected information from different follow-up period all on the principle of Cocharan handbook. At last statistal analysis was performed in RevMan 5.3 to calculate relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThirteen studies were enrolled in this Meta-analysis with 10 753 patients, including 5 263 cases in TAVR group and 5 490 cases in SAVR group. Meta-analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality between TAVR group and SAVR group in 30 days, 1 year or 2 years after operation [RR=0.96, 95%CI (0.75, 1.24), P=0.78; RR=0.84, 95%CI (0.68, 1.03), P=0.09; RR=0.97, 95%CI (0.84, 1.14), P=0.75]; while stroke more preferred SAVR no matter 30 days or 1 year [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.51, 0.80), P<0.000 1;RR=0.76, 95%CI (0.63, 0.92), P=0.004].ConclusionThere is no significant difference in all-cause mortality of intermediate-low risk patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR, but TAVR perfoms better in terms of srtoke.
ObjectiveTo systematically assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous access and surgical cutdown in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI).MethodsWe searched databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet and Wanfang Database to collect randomized or non-randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous access (PC group, the trial/exposure group) with surgical cutdown (SC group, the control group) in TF-TAVI between January 2002 and October 2017. The quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out by 2 reviewers independently. The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.5 software.ResultsA total of 11 literatures involving 4 893 aortic valve stenosis patients treated by TF-TAVI (2 877 patients in PC group and 2 016 patients in SC group) were included in this Meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between PC and SC group in terms of major vascular complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.70, 1.06), P=0.17], minor vascular complications [OR=1.43, 95%CI (0.87, 2.37), P=0.16], major bleeding [OR=1.02, 95%CI (0.55, 1.90), P=0.94], minor bleeding [OR=0.90, 95%CI (0.51, 1.61), P=0.73] and all-cause mortality within 30 days [OR=1.03, 95%CI (0.76, 1.40), P=0.85]. As for the length of stay after TAVI, there was significant difference between the two groups [standard mean difference=–0.32, 95%CI (–0.52, –0.12), P=0.002].ConclusionPercutaneous access is as effective and safe as surgical cutdown in TF-TAVI, meanwhile leading to shorter length of stay after TAVI.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of Venus A-Valve and other overseas devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the baseline characteristics, procedural details, and postprocedural outcomes of severe AS patients who underwent TAVR with Venus A-Valve or overseas devices between April 2012 and January 2019 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University.ResultsA total of 342 AS patients undergoing TAVR were finally included, 238 with Venus A-Valve and the other 104 with overseas devices (43 with CoreValve, 33 with Lotus, 21 with SAPIEN XT, and 7 with SAPIEN 3). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, and the proportion of patients with bicuspid aortic valve was around 50% in both groups. After successful valve implantation, all patients’ hemodynamics were significantly improved, with the median of maximum velocity decreased to 2.30 m/s (inter-quartile range: 0.60 m/s) and 2.50 m/s (inter-quartile range: 0.62 m/s), respectively (P=0.003). Postprocedural 30-day and 1-year all cause mortalities were similar (30-day: 5.9% vs. 1.9%, P=0.086; 1-year: 8.4% vs. 5.8%, P=0.307), while low incidence of procedure-related complications and improved life quality were achieved in both groups.ConclusionTAVR with the domestic Venus A-Valve is feasible, safe, and can produce favorable outcomes for AS patients, and especially for Chinese TAVR population with a high prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve.
Coronary artery obstruction is a rare but fatal complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Although there is no accepted criteria to fully evaluate the occurrence of coronary artery obstruction, studies have revealed many important risk factors, and some preventive measures have also been found to reduce their occurrence. At present, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is in a stage of rapid development in China, but clinical medical workers’ knowledge of coronary artery obstruction as a complication still needs to be improved. This article discusses the incidence, risk factors, predictive assessment, prevention, treatment and prognosis of coronary artery obstruction complicated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement, so as to increase clinical medical workers’ understanding of this complication.
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in aortic stenosis patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). Methods This retrospective study included 252 consecutive patients with severe and symptomatic aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVR in West China Hospital form April 2012 to September 2017, in whom 4 patients were excluded because of valve failure after surgical aortic valve replacement. Results Of the 248 patients, 131 had BAV and 117 had TAV. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, including age [(73.56±6.35) vs. (74.31±6.35) years, P=0.354], male proportion (51.9% vs. 63.2%, P=0.072). Society of Thoracic Surgeons score for BAV patients was lower than that for TAV patients [(7.56±4.01)% vs. (8.78±5.14)%, P=0.037]. Procedural success rate was high in both BAV and TAV groups (95.4% vs. 98.3%, P=0.359). There was no difference in 30-day all-cause mortality (6.1% vs. 2.6%, P=0.176) between the two groups; the aortic valve maximum velocity of valve hemodynamics after TAVR was similiar [(2.39±0.53) vs. (2.31±0.45) m/s, P=0.262] between the two groups. Conclusions Patients with BAV show similar procedural and clinical outcomes to patients with TAV. Therefore, TAVR appears to be a safe and effective procedure for patients with BAV as well as those with TAV.
A 78-year-old female patient was admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University because of “amaurosis and polypnea for 4+ years”. The examination results before admission showed that severe stenosis of aortic valve, bicuspid aortic valve malformation, severe horizontal heart with 61.54° aortic angle. The preoperative evaluation of the patient indicated that the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 17.9%, which was high risk for surgery. After discussion by the heart team, the aortic stenosis was finally relieved by transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The operation was successfully completed by using the method of pulling and releasing the device with the same side basket. One month follow-up showed that the patient’s condition was stable and no complications occurred. This case aims to provide a reference for the treatment of horizontal heart with aortic stenosis. In the future, it is hoped that through continuous clinical practice, such patients will be provided with a safer and more efficient treatment plan.
Aortic stenosis accounts for a large proportion of valvular heart disease in China. This article described an unusual case of severe aortic stenosis with severe cardiopulmonary decompensation treated by emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Preoperative assessment was performed by transesophageal echocardiography. The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team was informed to be ready. During the operation, no obvious perivalve leakage was observed after valve released. The transvalvular pressure gradient decreased to 7 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa).The patient’s symptoms were completely relieved after the operation, and no adverse events occurred during the hospitalization. After discharge, color Doppler echocardiography showed that stenosis was eliminated, cardiac function was improved, no significant perivalvular leakage was observed, and pulmonary hypertension reduced to moderate. The success of this operation confirmed the efficacy of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and showed that after a rigorous evaluation, emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement may be a reasonable choice for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.
Reports about the application of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with aortic stenosis, whose valve sizes exceed the maximum recommended annular diameter of the largest artificial valve, is rarely in China. This paper reports an aortic stenosis patient characterized by large aortic annulus diameter with severe calcification and treated by TAVR. A comprehensive and careful operation plan was made before the operation. The anterior and posterior balloon dilatation and coronary artery protection were used during the operation. The patient was followed up for 2 years and was in stable condition.