Objective To systematically search for evidence related to the prevention and management of kinesiophobia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty at home and abroad, evaluate and integrate the evidence, and to provide reference for clinical nursing practice. Methods Domestic and international evidence-based resource databases, including UpToDate, BMJ (British Medical Journal) Best Practice, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines network, JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) evidence-based healthcare center database, Cochrane Library, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario website, China guidelines network, Web of Science, PubMed, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched. Evidence related to the prevention and management of kinesiophobia after total knee arthroplasty was collected, and the search period was until June 30, 2023. The evidence extraction and integration were conducted on the literature that meets the requirements. Results A total of 10 papers were ultimately included, including 1 guideline, 1 expert consensus, 2 systematic evaluations, 4 randomized controlled studies, and 2 cohort studies. A total of 17 pieces of evidence were extracted from 5 aspects, including risk assessment, health education, intraoperative pain management, rehabilitation exercise, and patient participation. Conclusion The prevention and management of kinesiphobia after total knee arthroplasty include evidence from multiple aspects, which can provide evidence-based basis for orthopedic and rehabilitation medical staff to develop intervention plans for kinesiphobia and promote rapid recovery of patients with total knee arthroplasty.
Objective To analyze the perioperative outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods Data were extracted from the Western China Lung Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained database at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Perioperative outcomes of the patients who underwent uniportal or three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer during January 2014 through April 2021 were analyzed by using propensity score matching. Altogether 5 817 lung cancer patients were enrolled who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (uniportal: 530 patients; three-port: 5 287 patients). After matching, 529 patients of uniportal and 1 583 patients of three-port were included. There were 529 patients with 320 males and 209 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the uniportal group and 1 583 patients with 915 males and 668 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the three-port group. Results Uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs. 30 mL, P<0.001), longer operative time (115 min vs. 105 min, P<0.001) than three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissected, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, incidence of postoperative complication, postoperative pain score within 3 postoperative days, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization expenses. Conclusion Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and effective, and the overall perioperative outcomes are comparable between uniportal and three-port strategies, although the two groups show differences in intraoperative blood loss.