ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) and hollow compression screw in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. MethodsBetween January 2010 and June 2014, 70 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups. After reduction, fracture was fixed with PCCP in 35 cases (group A) and with hollow compression screw in 35 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, cause, side and type of fractures, time from injury to operation, associated disease, pre-operative Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, fracture healing time, fracture reduction quality, time of rehabilitation and weightloading; complication, post-operative Harris score and post-operative VAS score were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 13-34 months (mean, 23.7 months). There were significant differences in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and fracture healing time between 2 groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant in the fracture reduction quality between 2 groups (P > 0.05). Avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 2 cases of group A after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade IV); and avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 4 cases of group B after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade I in 2 cases, grade Ⅱ in 1 case, grade Ⅲ in 1 case, and grade IV in 1 case), nonunion in 1 case, and screw loosening in 3 cases; and there was significant difference in the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head between 2 groups (χ2=-3.997, P=0.046). Difference was significant in fracture reduction quality in the patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head and nonunion between 2 groups (χ2=1.991, P=0.047). The time of rehabilitation and weight-loading of group A was significantly earlier than that of group B (P < 0.05); the Harris and VAS scores of group A were significantly better than those of group B at 12 months after operation (P < 0.05). ConclusionPCCP for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures has better static stability and better sliding dynamic pressure effect than hollow compression screw, and it can provide earlier rehabilitation and weight-loading postoperatively and obviously decrease the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, but avascular necrosis of the femoral head still occur in patients with poor reduction or comminuted fracture.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress in the treatment of fractures by far cortical locking technique. MethodThe domestic and foreign related literature about the treatment of fractures by far cortical locking technique was reviewed, summarized, and analyzed. ResultsIn order to overcome the shortcomings of high stress at the near side of the plate and high stiffness of traditional locking plate, a new far cortical locking technique has been developed recently. The structure retains the overall strength of locking plate, but decreases the stiffness of the fixation by 80%, so it can provide interfragmentary parallel micromotion and help to form symmetric callus, and satisfactory results have been achieved in theory, experiment, and clinical application of treatment of fractures by far cortical locking. ConclusionsThe far cortical locking technique is a major improvement of locking plate, which is expected to significantly reduce delayed healing and nonunion of some fractures treated with traditional locking plate.
Objective To explore the operative method and effectiveness of talocalcaneal coal ition.Methods Between July 2008 and October 2010, 10 patients with talocalcaneal coal ition were treated, including 2 cases ofcongenital talocalcaneal coal ition and 8 cases of secondary talocalcaneal coal ition. There were 4 males and 6 females, aged53.5 years on average (range, 16-70 years). Three patients had middle-facet talocalcaneal coal ition and 7 had posterior-facettalocalcaneal coal ition. The preoperative visual analogue score (VAS) was 9.0 ± 0.4. According to American OrthopedicFoot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale, the score was 42.4 ± 1.4. Two cases compl icated by subtalar degeneration.Resection of the bone bar and fat packing were performed in 8 cases of simple talocalcaneal coal ition, and resection and subtalararthrodesis in 2 cases of talocalcaneal coal ition combined with subtalar degeneration. Results Primary healing of incisionswas obtained in all patients. Eight patients were followed up 18 months on average (range, 12-36 months). At last follow-up,VAS was 2.0 ± 0.7, showing siginificant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=6.425, P=0.000). AOFAS score was86.9 ± 2.3, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=7.634, P=0.000). The X-ray films showedthat no recurrence of talocalcaneal coal ition was observed in patients underdoing simple removal of bone bar, and bone fusionwas observed in patients undergoing arthrodesis. Conclusion To achieve satisfactory outcomes for talocalcaneal coal ition, areasonable surgical procedure should be chosen according to the specific facet and complication.