Objective To investigate the effectiveness of teaching morning handover in clinical teaching of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in general hospitals. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at the Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2023 to March 2024, involving a total of 220 participants including interns, postgraduates/standardized training students, and residents/refresher students. The control group consisted of trainees who studied from April to September 2023, while the observation group included those who studied from October 2023 to March 2024. Teaching morning handover was added to the clinical morning report for the observation group, while the control group only conducted the conventional clinical morning report. Due to the differences in basic knowledge and clinical positioning, trainees except interns were classified as clinical residents. A questionnaire survey including satisfaction of teaching content, teaching methods, teaching ability and teaching management and graduation assessment including total score, theoretical assessment score, clinical process score and participation in teaching activities were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with those of the interns (n=57) and clinical residents (n=49) in the control group respectively, there was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction of teaching content, teaching methods or teaching ability of the interns (n=78) and clinical residents (n=36) in the observation group (P>0.05); however, teaching management satisfaction was significantly improved (interns P=0.002, clinical residents P=0.022). Both the interns and clinical residents in the observation group had a significantly higher total score as well as theoretical assessment score and increased participation in teaching activities (P values for interns were <0.001, 0.001, and <0.001, respectively, and for clinical residents were <0.001, 0.013, and <0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference observed between groups regarding clinical process score (P>0.05). Conclusion Teaching morning handover is helpful in improving the quality of TCM teaching in general hospitals and is an effective model for clinical teaching of TCM.
【摘要】 目的 评价生长抑素联合中药在治疗重症急性胰腺炎中的有效性。 方法 应用国际Cochrane协作网系统评价方法对生长抑素联合中药治疗重症急性胰腺炎的随机对照试验（RCT）进行系统评价。计算机检索MEDLINE（Ovid）、PubMed数据库、中文科技期全文数据库（VIP）、万方数据库、中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI）、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）。检索时间均为建库至2009年9月。文献检索语种为英语和中文。 结果 共纳入8个RCT，436例患者，所有纳入试验在治疗末均未进行随访。Meta分析结果显示，生长抑素联合中药治疗组（治疗组）的病死率（13/188，6.9%）明显低于单纯生长抑素治疗组（对照组）（24/174，13.7%），差异有统计学意义[Peto OR=0.46，95%CI（0.22，0.94），Plt;0.05]。治疗组平均住院日低于对照组[WMD=-7.01，95%CI（-7.89，-6.13），Plt;0.000 01]。治疗组腹痛缓解时间明显低于对照组，其差异有统计学意义[WMD=-0.77，95%CI（-0.82，-0.72），Plt;0.000 01]。治疗组与对照组治疗第7天APACHE Ⅱ评分均下降，治疗组下降幅度大于对照组，两组比较差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。治疗组并发症发生率（26/91，28.6%）与对照组（35/88，39.8%）相比，其差异无统计学意义[Peto OR=0.61，95%CI（0.32，1.13），P=0.12]。 结论 生长抑素联合中药治疗在改善重症急性胰腺炎的病死率、平均住院时间、腹痛缓解时间、APACHE Ⅱ评分下降幅度优于单纯生长抑素治疗。
【摘要】 目的 探讨血浆胰蛋白酶原激活肽(trypsinogen activation peptide,TAP)水平与重症急性胰腺炎(severe acute pancreatitis,SAP)胰腺坏死的关系。方法 2008年6月1日—2008年12月31日,采用ELISA法测定本院的35例SAP患者血浆TAP水平,并与胰腺增强CT扫描结果作对比,分析血浆TAP水平与胰腺坏死的关系,以及SAP无胰腺坏死组与SAP胰腺坏死组血浆TAP水平的差异。结果 入院时血浆TAP水平预测胰腺坏死的最佳截值点是10.43 nmol/mL,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为75%、73.9%、60%、15%,阳性比为2.87,阴性比为0.338。入院第1天血浆TAP水平预测胰腺坏死的最佳截值点是6.91 μmol/L,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为90.9%、65.2%、55.6%、6.3%,阳性似然比为2.61,阴性似然比为0.001。SAP胰腺坏死组入院时、入院第一天血浆TAP水平高于SAP无胰腺坏死组(Plt;0.05)。结论 血浆TAP水平变化与SAP病情变化密切相关,病程早期检测血浆TAP水平有助于SAP患者胰腺坏死的预测