Objective To explore the causes and treatment of rebleeding after operation on portal hypertension patients. Methods The clinical data of 41 rebleeding cases underwent the operational between January 2000 and December 2009 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results All 13 cases who got rebleeding after shunt operation received lienectomy, but for those who got rebleeding after lienectomy, 23 patients received Phemister or modified Phemister or expanded lienectomy and 5 patients received shunt operation. Surgical related complications occurred in 7 cases (17.1%) at 2 weeks after operation, including abdominal bleeding (3 cases), gastrointestinal bleeding (2 cases), and intractable ascites (2 cases). After the follow-up of 3-60 months (mean 39 months), all patients were still alive. During the follow-up, 3 cases of recurrent esophageal varices were observed and one of them got rebleeding.Conclusion The majority of rebleeding after lienectomy tend to be ascribed to the wrong operations chose, while bad operation skill often contribute to the rebleeding after shunt operation, suggesting ideal therapeutic effect for rebleeding can benefit from appropriate operation choose.
Objective To investigate the anatomical character and variation of non-recurrent laryngeal nerve （NRLN）， and to explore measurement to identify and prevent injury of this nerve during thyroidectomy. Methods Clinical data of 2 211 patients who underwent thyroidectomy from Jan. 2007 to Jun. 2012 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were analyzed retrospectively， and 114 patients with NRLN of related literature reviews were analyzed too. Results There were 3 479 recurrent laryngeal nerve （2 211 cases） which were exposed during thyroid operation in Peking Union Medical College Hospital， of which 11 cases were confirmed to be right NRLN （0.32%， 11/3 479）. Of the 11 cases， 3 cases were typeⅠ， 7 cases were typeⅡA， and 1 case was typeⅡB， one case was also found to have a recurrent branch. None of them injured during operation. One hundred and fourteen cases of NRLN （0.14%-4%） were found in literature reviews. Of the 114 cases， 109 cases were confirmed to be right NRLN， of which 4 cases were typeⅠ （3.7%， 4/109）， 75 cases were typeⅡA （68.8%， 75/109）， 9 cases were typeⅡB （8.3%， 9/109）， 21 cases were unclear （19.3%， 21/109）， 3 cases were also found to have a recurrent branch （2.8%，3/109）. Five cases were confirmed to be left NRLN， of which 2 cases were typeⅡA， 3 cases were unclear， 1 case was also found to have a recurrent branch. Of all the 104 cases reported by treatises and case reports， 16 cases injured during operation， of which 1 case was typeⅠ， 9 cases were typeⅡA， 6 cases were unclear. Conclusions NRLN， which is a rare anomaly， usually happens on the right， and very vulnerable during thyroid surgery. The most usually injured type is typeⅡA. Fully acknowledgment of the NRLN and its variant types is very helpful to avoid damage during thyroid surgery.
Objective To explore the effect of multi-disciplinary treatment of the Graves’ disease (GD) with huge-size thyroid during perioperative period. Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 8 GD patients with huge-size thyroid who got treatment in Pekin Union Medical College Hospital during Jan. 2006 to Dec. 2016. All patients underwent comprehensive preparation before operation and underwent total thyroidectomy. To explore the changes of thyroid function and culture after anti-thyroid drug (ATD)/iodine preparation/arterial embolization before operation, and to summarize situation of the bleeding loss intraoperation, neck-drainage, thyroid function, and relapses after operation. Results All cases got a satisfactory operation result after standard ATD, iodine preparation (Lugol’s solution 10–15 drops for 3–4 weeks, combined with ATDs for 2–3 weeks ), and main arterial embolization of thyroid in 24 h preoperation. They got shorter operative time (2.5–4.5 h), less bleeding intraoperation (4 cases≤100 mL), less neck-drainage, and almost normal retention time. No severe or permanent complications, for example thyroid storm, abnormal voice, and hypoparathyroid occurred. They were followed as outpatients for 18–133 months, and were found a perfect long-term effect without complication and relapse. Conclusions Perioperative period management is very important to those GD patients with huge-sized thyroid, and multi-disciplinary treatment can decrease theintraoperation bleeding, as well as occurrence of thyroid storm effectively. In addition, operated subtly during surgery can protect the recurrent laryngeal nerve and parathyroid effectively.
Surgery is the preferred treatment for resectable esophageal cancer, but in locally advanced esophageal cancer, the effect of surgery alone is not ideal, so surgery-based comprehensive treatment is the best option. Neoadjuvant therapy has become a standard treatment in the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, etc. With the significant efficacy and acceptable toxicity of immunotherapy in the first-line and second-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has become a research hotspot of locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. This article reviews the latest research progress and some limitations of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer.
Objective To observe the short-term efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). MethodsClinical data were collected from patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgical treatment at the Thoracic Surgery Department of Jining First People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2022. The endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, safety, and postoperative survival. Results A total of 43 patients with ESCC who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery were included. Among them, there were 31 males and 12 females, aged from 46 to 77 years, with a median age of 65 years. All patients successfully completed the surgery without any surgical delays. The pCR rate was 14.0% (6/43), the MPR rate was 58.1% (25/43), and the R0 resection rate was 97.7% (42/43). Patients exhibited reliable safety during neoadjuvant therapy and postoperatively. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 90.7% and 81.4%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test revealed lower recurrence rates and better survival in the MPR group compared to the non-MPR group. Conclusion The combination of neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy, while also being safe and reliable.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Methods The clinical data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and surgery after chemotherapy alone from April 2021 to January 2021 in the first People's Hospital, Jining, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the preoperative neoadjuvant regimen, the patients were divided into a combination group and a chemotherapy group, and the clinical data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 66 patients were enrolled, including 61 males and 5 females. There were 53 patients in the combination group with an average age of 63.40±6.80 years, and 13 patients in the chemotherapy group with an average age of 58.62±8.30 years. There was statistical difference in age between the two groups (P=0.02), but no statistical difference in other baseline data (P＞0.05). MPR was 54.7% in the combination group and 23.1% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.042), and PCR was 39.6% in the combination group and 0.0% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.006). The combined group had a shorter operative time (P=0.039). There were no statistical differences in intraoperative bleeding, postoperative tube-carrying time, postoperative complications, OS or EFS between the two groups. Conclusion Surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy is safe and feasible, and long-term efficacy should be confirmed by further follow-up.