ObjectiveTo systematically review risk factors for esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) after esophageal cancer surgery for adults to provide theoretical basis for clinical prevention and treatment.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, VIP, CNKI and CBM were searched from inception to January 2020 to collect case control studies and cohort studies about risk factors for EGAL after esophageal cancer surgery. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, and then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 33 studies were included, including 19 case-control studies and 14 cohort studies, all of which had a Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)≥6. There were 26 636 patients, including 20 283 males and 6 353 females, and there were 9 587 patients in China and 17 049 patients abroad. The results of meta-analysis showed that the following factors could increase the risk for EGAL (P≤0.05), including patient factors (18): age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, smoking index (≥400), alcohol history, digestive tract ulcer, respiratory disease, lower ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary atherosclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, arrhythmia, diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, celiac trunk calcification and descending aortic calcification; preoperative factors (6): abnormal liver function, renal insufficiency, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and preoperative albumin<35 g/L, preoperative lower albumin; intraoperative factors (7): retrosternal route, cervical anastomosis, thoracoscopic surgery, operation time≥4.5 h, tubular stomach, upper segment tumor, splenectomy; postoperative factors (5): respiratory failure, postoperative arrhythmia, use of fiberoptic bronchoscopy, pulmonary infection, deep venous thrombosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the risk for postoperative EGAL (P<0.05). However, age≥60 years, upper gastrointestinal inflammation, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), thoracic surgery history, abdominal surgery history, glucocorticoid drugs history, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, anastomotic embedding, end-to-end anastomosis, hand anastomosis, intraoperative blood loss and other factors were not significantly correlated with EGAL.ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that the risk factors for postoperative EGAL include age, sex, BMI, smoking index, alcohol history, peptic ulcer, FEV1/FVC, COPD, diabetes, ASA grading, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, preoperative albumin<35 g/L, cervical anastomosis, thoracoscopic surgery, operation time≥4.5 h, tubular stomach, upper segment tumor, intraoperative splenectomy, postoperative respiratory failure, postoperative arrhythmia and other risk factors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be the protection factor for EGAL. Due to limited study quality, more high quality studies are needed to verify the conclusion.
ObjectiveTo analyze the surgical outcome of patients with lung cancer using double micro-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) technique.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the perioperative data of 200 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent successful two micro-portal VATS lobectomy between September 2016 and June 2018 at our unit. There were 125 males and 75 females, aged 61.01±8.71 years. The length of the main operating hole was about 2.0–2.5 cm, the size of the secondary operating hole and the observation hole was 0.5 cm individually. Thus, the total length of the three incisions was 3.0–3.5 cm.ResultsThe mean operating time was 99.18±21.77 min, blood loss was 170.35±105.12 ml, and the mean number of dissected lymph node was 15.82±3.33. The mean volume and duration of chest tube were 446.90±195.32 ml and 3.67±1.85 days. The postoperative hospital stay was 5.54±2.41 days. Only one patient died of pulmonary embolism after surgery. There were 7 patients who were converted to thoracotomy. Postoperative pulmonary infection after lobectomy was found in 8 patients. Postoperative air leak over 5 days was developed in 7 patients.ConclusionThe double micro-portal VATS procedure is a safe and effective strategy for patients with lung cancer, which is associated with decreased surgical trauma and less postoperative pain. This emerging technology may benefit patients by enhancing comfort during their postoperative hospitalization.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of Da Vinci robotic-assisted left upper lobectomy for treating lung cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the perioperative data of 33 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent Da Vinci robotic-assisted left upper lobectomy between December 2016 and December 2018 in our hospital. Meanwhile, the perioperative data of 41 patients with lung cancer who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy during the same period by the same surgeon were studied as a control group. The resection was followed by the principle of "from back down to front up" way. Systemic lymph node dissection including No.4-9 was performed for all patients.ResultsAll patients received successful surgery with no case of conversion to thoracotomy and perioperative death. Comparing to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, the Da Vinci robotic-assisted left upper lobectomy had longer operating time (191.21±61.77 min vs. 154.51±38.81 min, P=0.003), more cost (82 307.75±11 859.03 yuan vs. 58 966.57±5 640.07 yuan, P=0.000), shorter chest tube duration (4.58±1.77 d vs. 5.41±1.52 d, P=0.031) and postoperative hospital stay (6.48±1.82 d vs. 7.66±2.12 d, P=0.014). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding to blood loss, lymph node dissection, postoperative pain score, total chest drainage volume, chest drainage volume per day and the rate of pulmonary complications.ConclusionThe Da Vinci robotic-assisted left upper lobectomy for treating lung cancer is safe and more minimally invasive, but more expensive.
How to effectively repair esophageal fistulas, caused by esophageal perforation, rupture and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy has always been a key problem for the digestive surgeon. Although there are many clinical treatment methods, the therapeutic effect is still completely unsatisfactory, especially when severe mediastinal purulent cavity infection is associated with the esophageal fistula. In recent years, foreign centers have promoted a new minimally invasive endoscopic treatment technology to repair the esophageal fistula, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy, with significantly curative effect. In this article, we will review the specific operation, advantages and disadvantages, as well as the clinical efficacy of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy in treating the esophageal fistulas, to provide a new therapeutic technique for esophageal fistulas and expand the new field of minimally invasive endoscopic therapy.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) after esophageal cancer surgery, and to establish a risk prediction model for early prevention and treatment.MethodsClinical data of patients undergoing esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2013 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The independent risk factors for postoperative EGAL were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a clinical nomogram prediction model was established. According to whether EGAL occurred after operation, the patients were divided into an anastomotic fistula group and a non-anastomotic fistula group.ResultsA total of 303 patiens were enrolled, including 267 males and 36 females with a mean age of 62.30±7.36 years. The incidence rate of postoperative EGAL was 15.2% (46/303). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high blood pressure, chronic bronchitis, peptic ulcer, operation way, the number of lymph node dissected, anastomotic way, the number of intraoperative chest drainage tube, tumor location, no-supplementing albumin in the first three days after operation, postoperative pulmonary infection, postoperative use of bronchoscope were the independent risk factors for EGAL after esophageal cancer surgery (P<0.05). A prognostic nomogram model was established based on these factors with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.954 (95%CI 0.924-0.975), indicating a high predictive value.ConclusionThe clinical prediction model based on 11 perioperative risk factors in the study has a good evaluation efficacy and can promote the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of EGAL.