Objective To review the progress of the pedicle screw augmentation technique by bone cement. Methods Recent literature about the pedicle screw augmentation technique by bone cement was reviewed and analysed. The characters were summarized. Results Pedicle augmentation technique includes the augmentation of ordinary solid pedicle screw and hollow pedicle screw. Both types could increase the fixation strength and gain satisfactory clinical results. Bone cement leakage had a certain incidence rate, but most of cases were asymptom. Conclusion Bone cement augmentation of pedicle screw is an effective and safe internal fixation for poor bone condition.
Objective To explore the effect of basic fibroblast growth factor（bFGF）and epidermal growth factor（EGF）on the growth of muscle derived stem cells(MDSCs). Methods MDSCs were isolated from hindlimb muscle of 15 new born Kunming mice through serial preplates. 2% fetal bovine serum-containing DMEM was used to induce MDSCs to differentiate into skeletal muscle lineage. The expressions of stem cell marker Sca-1 and skeletal musclecell marker αSarcomeric actin were examined by immunocytochemistry. The effect of bFGF and EGF on the proliferation of MDSCs was determined by MTT colorimetric microassay. The solo effect of bFGF or EGF at different concentrations (6.25,12.50, 25.00, 50.00, and 100.00 ng/ml) was examined at 96 h and the combined effect (100.00 ng/ml) was examined at 24,48,72 and 96 h.Results MDSCs were successfully isolated from the hindlimb of neonatal mice. Over 90% of MDSCs showed Sca-1 positive immunoreactivity. MDSCs could give rise to α Sarcomeric actin positive myotubes in differentiation cultures. The proliferative effect of bFGF and EGF on MDSCs increased with the elevated concentration.bFGF began to show significant proliferative effect at 12.50 ng/ml (P＜0.05). The effect increased significantly when the concentration reached 25.00 ng/ml from 12.50 ng/ml (P＜0.01) and reached a saturation point. The effect at 50.00 ng/ml or 100.00 ng/ml showed no significant increase when compared with thatat 25.00 ng/ml. EGF had a similar effect to bFGF except that the saturation concentration was 50.00 ng/ml. EGF showed significant effect at 72 h and bFGF at 96 h (Plt;0.01). When they were applied together, significant effect was shownat 24 h (Plt;0.01) and much higher effect was observed at 48, 72 and 96 h (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Both bFGF and EGF can promote the proliferation of MDSCs. The combined application reacts faster and ber.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of robot assisted and C-arm assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of single/double-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).MethodsThe clinical data of 108 cases of single/double-segment OVCF who met the selection criteria between May 2018 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 65 cases of single-segment fractures, of which 38 cases underwent “TiRobot” orthopedic robot-assisted PKP (robot group), 27 cases underwent C-arm X-ray machine fluoroscopy-assisted PKP (C-arm group). There were 43 cases of double-segment fractures, including 21 cases in robot group and 22 cases in C-arm group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, fracture segment distribution, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA), and height of fractured vertebra (HFV) in the patients with single/double-segments fractures between robot group and C-arm group (P>0.05). The operation time, the fluoroscopy frequency of the surgeons and the patient, the fluoroscopy exposure time of the surgeons and the patient, the radiation dose of the C-arm; the VAS scores, VKA, HFV before operation, at 1 day and 6 months after operation; and the complications in the two groups were recorded and compared.ResultsAll patients underwent surgery successfully. The operation time of the single-segment robot group was significantly longer than that of the C-arm group (t=5.514, P=0.000), while the operation time of the double-segment robot group was not significantly different from that of the C-arm group (t=1.892, P=0.205). The single/double-segment robot group required three-dimensional scanning, so the fluoroscopy frequency, fluoroscopy exposure time, and radiation dose of C-arm received by the patient were significantly higher than those of the C-arm group (P<0.05); the fluoroscopy frequency and the fluoroscopy exposure time received by the surgeons were significantly less than those of the C-arm group (P<0.05). There was no infection, embolism, neurological injury, and adjacent segmental fractures. The single/double-segment robot group showed lower rate of cement leakage when compared with the C-arm group (P<0.05), all the cases of cement leakage happened outside the spinal canal. The VAS score, VKA, and HFV of the single/double-segment robot group and the C-arm group were significantly improved at 1 day and 6 months after operation (P<0.05), and the VAS score at 6 months after operation was further improved compared with that at 1 day after operation (P<0.05). At 1 day and 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the single/double-segment robot group and the C-arm group (P>0.05). The VKA and HFV of robot group were significantly better than those of the C-arm group (P<0.05).ConclusionFor single/double-segment OVCF, robot assisted PKP has more advantages in correcting VKA and HFV, reducing fluoroscopy exposure of surgeons and bone cement leakage rate; C-arm assisted PKP has more advantages in reducing the operation time of single-segment OVCF and fluoroscopy exposure of patients during operation.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted (RA) minimally invasive surgery versus traditional fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) open posterior fixation surgery in treating thoracolumbar fractures with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). MethodsA clinical data of 21 cases of thoracolumbar fractures with AS who met the selection criteria between December 2016 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Ten cases underwent RA minimally invasive surgery group (RA group) and 11 cases underwent FA open posterior fixation surgery (FA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture segment distribution, fracture type, time from injury to surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading between RA group and FA group (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, radiation exposure time, radiation dose, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded. According to Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by CT within 1 week after surgery. During follow-up, pain and nerve function were evaluated by VAS score and ASIA grading. ResultsAll patients underwent surgery successfully, and there was no significant difference in operation time (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in the RA group were significantly less than those in the FA group (P<0.05), and the radiation exposure time and radiation dose were significantly more than those in the FA group (P<0.05). A total of 249 pedicle screws were implanted in the two groups, including 118 in the RA group and 131 in the FA group. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grades A and B) in the RA group was significantly higher than that in the FA group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 3-12 months, with an average of 6.8 months. The VAS scores of the two groups after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). The RA group had lower scores than the fluoroscopy group at 1 week and 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in neurological function grading between groups at 1 week and 3 months after surgery (P>0.05). In the FA group, 1 case of deep infection and 1 case of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity occurred, while no complication occurred in the RA group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both RA minimally invasive surgery and FA open posterior fixation surgery can achieve good effectiveness. Compared with the latter, the former has more advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and accuracy of pedicle screw insertion.