west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "LIUZhao" 2 results
  • Literature Analysis of the Reporting of Outcome Measurements in Randomized Controlled Trials of Smoking Cessation

    ObjectiveThrough the analysis on outcome measurements in domestic and overseas randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of smoking cessation, this study aimed to provide references for clinical trial design in the future. MethodsWe searched CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, EMbase, ScienceDirect and SpringLink databases to collect RCTs regarding smoking cessation from January 1998 to December 2013. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, and analyzed the outcome measurements of included RCTs. ResultsA total of 68 RCTs regarding smoking cessation were included. As for the baseline measurements, the frequency from high to low were age, sex, daily cigarette, smoking duration, Fagerstrom Test For Nicotine Dependence (FTND), race and education, etc.; there were significant differences of race, education level, smoking duration, smoking, starting age of smoking, attempts of trying to stop smoking, the presence of other basic disease, FTND and quit date between English and Chinese RCTs (all P<0.05). As for efficacy measurements, the continuous abstinence rate (77.8%) was mainly adopted in Chinese RCTs, while point abstinence rate (95.1%) and continuous abstinence rate (82.9%) was selected in English RCTs. As for the follow-up measurements, 22.1% of the included RCTs did not report it, 70.6% of the RCTs reported abstinence rate, and the follow-up time in Chinese RCTs was shorter than that in the English RCTs (P<0.05). ConclusionThe selection of outcome measurements is significantly different among RCTs regarding smoking cessation, the Chinese RCTs are inferior to English RCTs, and these are needed to be improved in the future clinical trials.

    Release date:2016-10-02 04:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Intracranial Angioplasty with Gateway-Wingspan System for Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Meta-analysis of Single rate

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the safety and validity of the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis diseases (ICAD) by using Wingspan stents, and to provide the reference for clinical practice and research. MethodsDatabases such as the PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBM, CNKI and VIP were searched for studies concerning the safety and validity of the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis diseases (ICAD) by using Wingspan stents from January 1st, 2005 to January 10th, 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, cohort studies and case series were all included. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using the R software. ResultsA total of 34 studies (2 RCTs, 22 cohort studies, and 10 case-control studies) involving 2 511 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:operation success rates was 96.75% (95%CI 95.82% to 97.48%), 30 day rates of the end point events was 8.75% (95%CI 7.61% to 10.04%), 1 year rates of the end point events was 13% (95%CI 11.47% to 14.70%), total mortality was 2.98% (95%CI 2.16% to 4.10%), incidence of in-stent restenosis was 21.76% (95%CI 18.27% to 25.71%), the ratio of the patients with symptomatic restenosis and total patients was 6.50% (95%CI 4.89% to 8.60%), and the ratio of the patients with symptomatic restenosis and total patients with restenosis was 26.06% (95%CI 19.94% to 33.29%). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that treatment of ICAD by using Wingspan stents is effective and safe. However, this conclusion should be approved by further higher quality RCTs.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content