ObjectiveTo investigate effect of small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting inhibition of growth hormone receptor (GHR) on proliferation and invasion of human liver cancer line SMMC-7721. MethodsSMMC-7721 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting human GHR by GenMuteTM transfection regent.The cells were divided into three groups:blank control group (non-transfected siRNA),negative control group (transfected with non-specific siRNA),and specificity transfected group (transfected with expression specifically interfere by GHR siRNA).the relative expression of GHR mRNA was detected by using real-time PCR.the expression of GHR protein was detected by using Western blot.The cell proliferation was assessed by CCK-8 assay.And the ability of invasion was examined by Transwell assay. ResultsThe expressions of GHR mRNA and GHR protein in the specificity transfected group were significantly lower than those in the blank control group (P<0.05) and the negative control group (P<0.05).Compared with the blank control group and the negative control group,the absorbance value and the number of migrating cells of SMMC-7721 cells were decreased obviously (P<0.05) in the specificity transfected group. ConclusionsiRNA targeting human GHR could reduce capability of proliferation migration and invasion of SMMC-7721 cells.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of hemihepatic blood flow occlusion versus Pringle's maneuver during hepatectomy. MethodsWe electronically searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hemihepatic blood flow occlusion versus Pringle's maneuver during hepatectomy. The duration of search was from the inception of the databases to August 2013. Meanwhile, references of the included studies were also retrieved. After literature selection, data extraction and quality assessment conducted by two reviewers independently, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsSeven studies involving 624 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) for safety, Pringle's maneuver was shorter than hemihepatic blood flow occlusion in operation time (SMD=0.34, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.66, P=0.04). But they were alike in intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, hospitalization time, and complications. b) For effectiveness, Pringle's maneuver was lower than hemihepatic blood flow occlusion in the levels of 3rd day ALT (SMD=-0.71, 95%CI-1.28 to-0.14, P=0.02), 7th day ALT (SMD=-1.73, 95%CI-2.85 to-0.62, P=0.002), 1st day AST (SMD=-0.74, 95%CI-1.38 to-0.09, P=0.03), 7th day AST (SMD=-0.99, 95%CI-1.26 to-0.71, P < 0.000 01), 3rd day TBIL (SMD=-0.34, 95%CI-0.57 to-0.10, P=0.005), and 7th day TBIL (SMD=-0.52, 95%CI-1.02 to-0.01, P=0.04). ConclusionCompared to the Pringle's maneuver, hemihepatic blood flow occlusion during hepatectomy could promote the recovery of liver function. However, the number of the included RCTs in the review is small and the quality is low, some of the main information is not reported and the information for analysis lacks. Therefore, the aforementioned conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more large-scale, multicenter and high-quality RCTs.