ObjectiveTo observe the effect of conbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA prospective randomized controlled clinical study. From June 2016 to June 2017, 68 eyes of 68 patients with DME diagnosed in Central Theater Command General Hospital were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups: 36 eyes (36 patients) in the conbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse lase group (combined treatment group) and 32 eyes (32 patients) in conbercept group (drug treatment group). All patients received three initial intravitreous injection of conbercept and re-treatment was performed according to the criteria which has been disigned before. BCVA was measured by ETDRS charts. The central macular thickness (CMT), total macular volume (TMV) were measured by Topcon 3D-OCT 2000. The BCVA, CMT and TMV in the combined treatment group and the drug treatment group were 57.9±12.4 letters, 427.8±129.4 μm, 10.14±1.50 mm3 and 59.0±16.0 letters, 441.0 ±135.7 μm, 10.43±2.10 mm3, respectively. There was no significant difference (t=0.321, 0.410, 0.641; P=0.749, 0.683, 0.524). The follow-up period was more than 12 months. The changes of BCVA, CMT and TMV were compared between the two groups. Comparison of BCVA, CMT, TMV before and after treatment in and between groups using repeated measures analysis of variance.ResultsThe average annual injection times was 5.8±1.9 in the combined treatment group and 8.5±2.4 in the drug treatment group. The difference was statistically significant (t=5.12, P=0.000). The BCVA in the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month were 64.9±11.1, 65.6±10.5, 67.0±10.8, 66.6±10.7 letters and 65.7±15.8, 66.9±15.7, 66.4±13.0, 67.3±16.4 letters, respectively, and there were significant differences compared with BCVA before treatment (F=34.234, 10.137; P=0.000, 0.000). The CMT were 335.2±105.9, 352.6±106.6, 336.2±120.8, 305.9±97.0 μm and 323.9±92.8, 325.5±90.2, 327.6±108.2, 312.2±106.8 μm, respectively. The TMV were 9.20±1.08, 9.26±1.20, 9.20±1.63, 9.05±1.18 mm3 and 9.19±1.21, 9.35±1.69, 9.09±1.20, 8.92±1.10 mm3, respectively. Compared with the CMT (F=12.152, 12.917; P=0.000, 0.000) and TMV (F=11.198, 11.008; P=0.000, 0.000) before treatment, the differences were statistically significant.ConclusionConbercept combined with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser and conbercept can effectively reduce CMT, TMV and improve BCVA in patients with DME, but combination therapy can reduce the injection times of conbercept.
ObjectiveTo observe the preliminary clinical application value of the handheld non-mydriatic visual electrophysiological diagnostic system RETeval in screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR).MethodsRetrospective clinical study. Fifty-eight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 16 normal subjects who were admitted to Wuhan General Hospital of the PLA from November 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled in this study. All patients had not received any ophthalmologic treatment. All patients were examined by the default “DR assessment protocol” model of the RETeval device, and the “DR score” were measured by the system. The FFA results were used as the gold standard, and the DR was graded according to the international DR grading standard established in 2002. Patients were divided into vision threatening DR (VTDR) positive group and VTDR (−) group, DR (+) group and DR (−) group. Two independent sample t tests was used to compare the implicit time, amplitude, and pupil area ratio between eyes of different groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between “DR score” and DR severity. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) assesses the sensitivity and specificity of RETeval in detecting DR and VTDR. The threshold of sensitivity and specificity was determined by using the maximum Youden index as a standard.ResultsThe AUC of DR was 0.936, the sensitivity was 81%, the specificity was 92%; the AUC of VTDR was 0.976, the sensitivity was 96% and the specificity was 70%. Compared with DR (−) group, the implicit time of DR (+) group was delayed and the amplitude and pupil area were decreased (t=－13.43, 5.49, 6.09; P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000). Compared with VTDR (−) group, the implicit time of VTDR (+) group was delayed and the amplitude and pupil area were decreased (t=－11.05, 7.46, 5.73; P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000). The “DR score” was significantly correlated with the severity of DR (r=0.89, P＜0.05).ConclusionsThe “DR score” measured by the RETeval instrument has a high degree of specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of DR and VTDR. It is highly correlated with the severity of DR.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser on diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods Retrospective case series study. A total of 30 patients (35 eyes) with center−involving DME were enrolled in this study. All the patients received the examinations of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus colorized photography, fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). BCVA was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts. The average retinal thickness (ART), total macular volume (TMV) and the retinal thickness (RT) and macular volume (MV) of 9 ETDRS domains were measured by the Japanese Topcon 3D-OCT 2000 instrument. The mean BCVA was 62.4±10.5 letters. The mean ART was 327.3±41.2 μm. The mean TMV was 9.24±1.17 mm3. All patients were treated with 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser treatment. Subthreshold micropulse laser were performed in the micropulse mode, using a 200 μm spot diameter, a 0.2 s duration with 5% duty cycle and its treatment energy was 6−7 times of threshold energy. Three months after treatment, re-treatment was performed on patients with incomplete absorption of macular edema. The treatment was the same as before. The BCVA, ART, TMV and the RT and MV of each ETDRS domain were compared and analyzed before and after treatment. The possible complications of micropulse laser treatment were also observed and the safety was evaluated. Results The difference of BCVA were statistically significant in month 3 and month 6 (t=−5.58, −7.24; P＜0.05), but not in month 1 (t=−1.82, P＞0.05). The average CRT (t=4.11, 4.17, 5.96), CMV (t=3.92, 4.05, 5.80) significantly decreased in 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). At sixth months, the average retinal thickness (t=3.53, 5.07, 5.02, 4.87, 4.94, 3.48, 4.03, 3.17, 3.73) and retinal volume (t=3.54, 5.16, 4.99, 4.91, 5.05, 3.47, 4.08, 3.10, 3.70) of the 9 ETDRS subdomains significantly decreased, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no visible laser spots, changes in the outer retina and complications of neovascularization and subretinal fibrosis in the fundus of all patients. Conclusion577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser can reduce the CMT, CMV and improve the BCVA of DME patients with high security.