Objective To investigate the clinical significance of applicating posterior internal fixation for regulating spinal curvature in thoracolumbar compression fractures. Methods Between May 2006 and May 2009, 63 patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 patients received traditional posterior internal fixation in control group; 30 patients underwent posterior internal fixation with spinal curvature correction under C-arm X-ray device in trial group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, cause of injury, injured segment, grade of fracture, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The Cobb angle, height of injured vertebral body, and disc height were measured by X-ray examination; loosening and breakage of internal fixation were observed and compared between 2 groups. The recovery rate was calculated according to pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores for each patient. Results All cases were followed up 20-45 months (mean, 31 months). The postoperative VAS score, ODI, Cobb angle, height of injured vertebral body, and disc height were improved significantly when compared with preoperative values in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). At last follow-up, VAS and ODI scores of trial group were significantly better than those of control group (P lt; 0.05); loss of Cobb angle was (2.1 ± 1.7)° in trial group and (4.2 ± 3.2)° in control group, showing significant difference (t=1.457, P=0.000); loss of disc height was (1.4 ± 1.2) mm in trial group and (3.4 ± 2.3) mm in control group, showing significant difference (t=9.336, P= 0.000); loss of height of injured vertebral body was 1.8% ± 0.6% in trial group and 5.4% ± 2.1% in control group, showing significant difference (t=3.435, P=0.000). Broken screw and loosening screw occurred in 1 case of control group, respectively (6.1%), but no broken or loosening screw in trial group, showing significant difference (P=0.000). Conclusion Application of posterior internal fixation for regulating spinal curvature has a good clinical effectiveness. The postoperative spinal curvature, the height of injured vertebral body, and disc height can be improved significantly and low back pain can be recovered satisfactorily. The modified technique is also effective in reducing broken and loosening incidence of the fixation system.
Objective To review the research progress of stress fracture of the lumbar pedicle. Methods The literature about the stress fracture of the lumbar pedicle was reviewed extensively and summarized. Results There are two types of stress fracture: fatigue and structure insufficient. Stress fracture of lumbar pedicle occurred mainly in the crowd with repetitive and large activities of spine, contralateral spondylolysis, or previous surgery of lumbar vertebra. The main stresses causing stress fracture of the lumbar pedicle are shear stress and twisting stress, followed by sudden hyperflexion or hyperextension of the spine. Stress fracture of lumbar pedicle was easily missed by conventional X-ray examination, usually XCT, MRI, or bone scan was needed to confirm the diagnosis. It is divided into 4 types or 4 periods according to MRI findings: stress reaction, incomplete fracture, complete fracture, and pseudarthrosis. For patients with incomplete, complete, and juvenile stress fractures of the lumbar pedicle without nerve root irritation, the majority of claims preferred conservative treatment and the healing rate of fracture was high; for patients with bilateral pseudarthrosis and with nerve root irritation as well as patients who failed to the conservative treatment, surgical management was advocated and the operation result is good. Conclusion Stress fracture of the lumbar pedicle as one of the causes of low back pain is extremely rare, and is easily missed clinically. Surgery or conservative management should be selected based on type of fracture and specific condition of the patient, the treatment results are satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the incidence of Modic changes of lumbar endplate and its cl inical significances. Methods The imaging data of 562 patients (2 810 lumbar intervertebral discs) with lumbar degenerative disease undergoingposterior operation from June 2006 to June 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 297 males and 265 femalesaged 26-77 years old (average 49 years old). The course of disease was 2 months to 40 years (median 10.4 years). Imaging examinations excluded the tuberculosis, cancer, infection, trauma, etc. The association of Modic changes with low back pain (LBP) and patients’ weight was analyzed according to the incidence and types of Modic changes as well as the distribution of gender, age and disc level through imaging data of MRI. Results Modic changes were observed in 106 patients (18.9%) of 113 intervertebral discs, including 40 (13.5%) males and 66 (24.9%) females. The difference between male proportion and female proportion had a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). Modic changes was distributed from age 26 to 77 years old (average 49 years old). Among all the patients, 33 cases (5.9%) were type I, 66 cases (11.7%) were type II, and 7 cases (1.2%) were type III. According to the segment, the lesions involved L5, S1 disc for 58 discs (51.3%), L4, 5 for 35 (31.0%), L3, 4 for 11 (9.7%), L2, 3 for 6 (5.3%), and L1, 2 for 3 (2.7%). The incidence of Modic change was 15.5% (41/264) in the normal body weight group, 16.3% (34/208) in the over-weight group, and 34.4% (31/90) in the obesity group. There was a significant association between obesity and the Modic change (P lt; 0.05). Preoperatively, there were 59 patients (55.7%) with LBP in the Modic group, including 27 cases of type I Modic change, 27 cases of type II Modic change, and 5 cases of type III Modic change. Postoperatively, the LBP of 40 patients (67.8%) were rel ieved, including 24 cases of type I Modic change, 14 cases of type II Modic change, and 2 cases of type III Modic change. In non-Modic change group, there were 126 patients (27.6%) with LBP preoperatively, and 96 patients (76.2%) eased the symptoms postoperatively. There was significant difference between two groups on incidence rate (P lt; 0.05),but no significant difference on the remission rate of LBP (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The most common Modic change is typeII and the most frequently involved level is the L5, S1. Modic changes are more common in female than in male and mainly happen to the obesity group. The incidence of LBP is higher in the patients with Modic change.
ObjectiveTo compare postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) on maternal low back pain after caesarean section. MethodsSixty cases of American Society of Anesthesiology gradeⅠ-Ⅱ single-birth full-term elective caesarean delivery primiparae chosen between July to September 2012 were divided into 3 groups randomly, 20 in each group. Group A accepted sufentanil 1 μg/mL and ropivacaine 1 mg/mL PCEA; group B had sufentanil 1.5 μg/mL PCEA; group C was given sufentanil 1.5 μg/mL and ondansetron 0.16 mg/mL PCIA. Background dose was 2 mL/h, patient-controlled analgesia dose was 2 mL, and locking time was 20 min. Visual analogue pain score was used to assess the effect of postoperative analgesia, and we recorded analgesia pump usage, adverse reactions, and at the same time investigated the onset of maternal low back pain. ResultsNo obvious postoperative pain was found, and the analgesic effect was good in all the three groups, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). All three groups of women had a certain proportion of low back pain, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). After operation, group A had 5 cases of leg numbness, group B had 1, and group C had none. Leg numbness occurred significantly more in group A than in group B and C (P<0.05). Group B had one case of nausea and vomiting, while none occurred in group A and C (P>0.05). ConclusionWith the same effect of postoperative analgesia, compared with PCIA, PCEA does not increase postoperative low back pain incidence after caesarean section.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical efficacy of exercise therapy for patients with low back pain. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from 2000 to September 2014 to collect randomized controlled trial (RCTs) about exercise therapy versus other therapies in the treatment of low back pain. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of five RCTs involving 413 patients were finally included. Compared with the control group, exercise therapy could relieve pain (MD=-0.92, 95%CI -1.32 to -0.51, P<0.000 1), and improve function activity (MD=-1.21, 95%CI -1.43 to -0.99, P<0.01). ConclusionExercise therapy can improve low back pain and functional activity to a certain extent. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, larger scale, multicenter, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the aforementioned conclusion.
ObjectivesTo overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of effectiveness and safety of spinal manipulation for low back pain or neck pain. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2015), CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP to collect SRs/MAs of spinal manipulation for low back pain or neck pain from inception to January 30th, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and then AMSTAR tool was used to assess the methodological quality of included SRs/MAs. ResultsA total of 21 SRs/MAs were included. Twenty of them assessed the methodological quality of included original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different tools:2 used Jadad scale, 5 used PEDro scale, 6 used Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and 7 used other tools. The assessment results of AMSTAR tool suggested that:among 11 items, the item 1 of "Was an ‘a priori’ design provided" (18 SRs/MAs did not provide) and item 4 of "Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided" (18 SRs/MAs did not provide) appeared to be the most problematic, followed by item 10 of "Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed" (14 SRs/MAs did not assess the publication bias) and item 11 of "Was the conflict of interest stated" (14 SRs/MAs did not provide the conflict of interest and 4 were incomplete). ConclusionThe methodological quality of included SRs/MAs is poor. The limited evidence showed that spinal manipulation is more effective for acute low back pain than chronic low back pain, and the short term effect is better than the long term one. Different spinal manipulation techniques have various effects but are all safe. Chiropractic manipulation may have the best effect. Due to the limitation of quality and quantity of included SRs/MAs, there may be potential bias in the above conclusion that needs more high quality studies to verify.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the prevalence of low back pain in adult population in China, so as to provide a reliable scientific basis for further scientific research and social decision-making of low back pain.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect the studies on prevalence of low back pain in adult population in China from inception to October 28, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, systematic review was performed.ResultsA total of 16 studies were included. The results showed that: significant heterogeneity had been observed among the different studies. The previous affected prevalence was 7.21% to 39.0%, annual prevalence was 20.88% to 29.88%, and time period prevalence was 6.11% to 28.5%. Six studies reported the different prevalence between genders, in which only one study found a little higher prevalence in male, and the other five found higher prevalence in females than males.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that there is significant heterogeneity in studies on prevalence of low back pain among adults in China, and all of them are data from a single province or region. It is suggested that a national prospective survey should be conducted to provide more accurate epidemiological data.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of yoga treatment for low back pain.MethodsWeb of Science, BBSCO Academic Source Complete, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of yoga intervention for low back pain from inception to November 4th, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 14 RCTs involving 1 684 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with conventional treatment, the RMDQ scores of yoga treatment for low back pain was statistically significant lower (MD=–1.86, 95%CI –2.39 to –1.33, P<0.000 01). The results of subgroup analysis showed that the exercise frequency, low back pain degree, low back pain cause, intervention period and sample size had not altered efficacy of yoga.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that yoga can achieve superior results in low back pain. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.