Objective To analyze the effectiveness of combined treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with MED, Quadrant, and Sextant-R systems. Methods Between August 2006 and June 2011, 35 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated, including 11 cases of isthmic spondylolisthesis and 24 cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis. There were 25 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 55 years (range, 33-71 years). The mean disease duration was 37 months (range, 8-75 months). Spondylolisthesis occurred at L4, 5 level in 21 patients and at L5, S1 level in 14 patients. According to Meyerding classification, 35 cases were rated as dergee I. The minimally invasive surgeries were performed by paraspinal muscle approach; Quadrant system was used for decompression and fusion at severe side, MED system for windowing of lamina at mild side, and Sextant-R system for fixation and reduction. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) to evaluate clinical outcomes, spondylolishesis ratio and intervertebral height to evaluate spondylolisthesis reduction. Results Lumbar continuous thin layer CT at postoperation showed that no pedicle screw invaded spinal canal and intervertebral fusion device was at good position. Incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 18-38 months (mean, 26 months). All patients got bone fusion and had no internal fixation failure by radiologic examination at 1 year after operation. Low back pain was relieved, lumbar function improved obviously, and satisfactory reduction of spondylolisthesis was obtained. At 2 weeks and 1 year after operation, the VAS score, ODI score, spondylolisthesis ratio, and intervertebral height were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). VAS score and ODI score showed significant differences (P lt; 0.05) between at 2 weeks and 1 year after operation. Spondylolisthesis ratio and intervertebral height showed no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) between at 2 weeks and at 1 year after operation. Conclusion Minimally invasive surgical management for lumbar spondylolisthesis via MED, Quadrant, and Sextant-R systems is a safe and effective surgical technique. However, its indications should be well considered.
Objective To evluate the clinical outcome of autograftsof ilium and interbody fusion cage or bone morphogenetic protein(BMP)／artificial bone material／ cage in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 1997 to January 2004，114 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation． There were 45 males and 69 females with an average age of 43 years ranging from 32 to 61 years. Of 114patients, 85 cases were classified as degree Ⅰ, 24 cases as degree Ⅱ and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. The patients were divided into three groups accordingto the material used for interbody fusion: autografts of ilium (group A, n=42), interbody fusion cages(group B, n=36), and BMP／artificial bone material／ cage (group C, n=36)．The clinical and radiographic results of the patients were compared among three groups． Results All patients were followed from 13 to 30 months with an average of 15 months． There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, blood loss, and disc space height of preoperation(P＞0.05) among three groups. No severe complication occurred in the three groups(P＞0.05). The excellent and good rates in groups A，B and C were 81.0％, 80.6％, and 83.3％ respectively, showing no statisticallysignificant difference(P＞0.05)．The fusion rate of group C(97.0%) was significantly higher than those of group A(81.0%) and group B(83.3%) (P＜0.05) after 1 year of operation．And the average loss of disc space height in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in group A(P＜0.05). Conclusion Higher fusion rate and lower loss of disc space height can beobtained in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with BMP／artificial bone materiel.It is an effective method in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion（PLIF） using simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixationand autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolisthesis. Methods From March 2003 to March 2004，Twenty-seven patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were divided in two groups. In group A, 15 patients were treated by PLIF using simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation, including 4 males and 11 females, aging 53-68 years. Isthmic defectswere located at L4 in 9 cases, at L5 in 6 cases. Four patients were smokers.Thepreoperative mean disc space height was 5.4±2.3 mm, the mean percentage of slip was 36.8％±7.2%. In group B, 12 patients were treated by PLIF using autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixation, including 3 males and 9 females, aging 56 years. Isthmic defects were located at L4 in 8 cases, atL5 in 4 cases. Five patients were smokers. The preoperative mean disc space height was 5.7±2.5 mm, the mean percentage of slip was 37.8%±6.2%. Two groupswere compared in the amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, back pain, radiating pain, fusion rate, the intervertebral disc space height, the postoperative degree of slip and the fusion rate. Results All patientswere followed up for 24-38 months. The mean follow-up was 29(24-36) months in group A and26(24-38) months in group B. There were no statistically significant differences infollow-up period, age,sex, the location of isthmic defects, smoking, the preoperative disc space height and the percentage of slip between two groups (Pgt;0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, the fusion time between two groups(Pgt;0.05). But there were statistically significant differences in the back pain score, the radiating pain score and the fusion rate between two groups(Plt;0.05).Thepo stoperative disc space height and the degree of slip of the last follow-up were5.8±2.2 mm and 25.6％±7.2% in group A, 6.2±2.5 mm and 24.1％±7.4 % ingroupB, showing statistically significant difference (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The PLIF using autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixations ismore beneficial to improving the fusion rate and preventing longterm instabilities than simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolisthesis.
BJECTIVE: To discuss the clinical effect and the application of AF device fixation system and PROSPACE interbody fusion cage on treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Twenty-one cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by operation from 1999 to 2002 were analyzed retrospectively (13 males and 8 females, 25-66 years old averaging 42 years). We had thorough decompression on the part of nerve compression and had replacement and fixation of the slippage vertebral body with the AF transpedicular screw/rod system so that the normal spine physiological curvature could be recovered, and then performed the posterolateral interbody fusion with implanting the PROSPACE filled with autograft bones. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up for 3 months to 3 years with an average of 15 months. The preoperation symptoms improved in 20 cases (95.2%). CONCLUSION: The combination of AF device fixation system and PROSPACE interbody fusion cage can relieve effectively nerve compression, recover the normal spinal physiological curvature, maintain the height of interbody and promote the nerve fusion. It is reliable and effective in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. MethodsBetween January 2011 and June 2012, 52 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent MI-TLIF assisted with microscope. There were 29 males and 23 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 32-67 years). The median disease duration was 3.2 years (range, 3 months to 6 years). There were 38 cases of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis and 14 cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis; 12 cases had stenosis secondary to lumbar spondylolisthesis. The affected segments were L4, 5 (29 cases) and L5, S1 (23 cases). According to the Meyerding evaluating system, 24 cases were classified as degree I and 28 cases as degree Ⅱ. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI)were used for clinical assessment, and the clinical effects were also analyzed by Macnab criterion at last follow-up. The radiographic data were used to evaluate reduction of spondylolisthesis, including slipping degree, slipping angle, and intervertebral space height. The fusion rate was assessed by Suk criterion. ResultsThe operations were performed successfully in all patients. No dural tear or cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred during operation. The average operation time was 105 minutes; the average intraoperative blood loss was 225 mL; the average postoperative drainage volume was 75 mL; and the average hospitalization days were 5.5 days. Superficial infection of incision occurred in 1 case and was cured after change dressing, and primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. All patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 18 months). No loosening, breakage, and displacement of pedicle screw and no Cage dislocation occurred by X-ray films after operation. The lumbar spondylolisthesis all got good correction. The three-dimensional CT showed continuous bone trabecula between centrums. The VAS score, ODI, and the slipping degree, slipping angle, and intervertebral space height were significantly improved at last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). According to Macnab criterion at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 20 cases, good in 29 cases, and fair in 3 cases; the excellent and good rate was 94.2%. According to Suk criterion for fusion, 49 cases obtained complete fusion and 3 cases got possible fusion. ConclusionAs long as indications are seized, MI-TLIF assisted with microscope is safe and reliable for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (Meyerding dergee I or Ⅱ), and it has the advantage of less injury, less blood loss, less complications, and definite short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical significance of individualized reference model of sagittal curves by three-dimensional (3D) printing technique and computer-aided navigation system for lumbar spondylolisthesis. MethodsBetween February 2011 and October 2012, 66 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) by traditional operation in 36 cases (control group) and by individualized reference model of sagittal curves by 3D printing technique and computer-aided navigation system in 30 cases (trial group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, segment, type of disease, degree of spondylolisthesis, and preoperative the visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy times, VAS score of low back pain and leg pain were compared between 2 groups; the sagittal screw angle (SSA), accuracy rate of pedicle screw, Taillard index, disc height recovery rate, and sagittal angle recovery rate were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and blood loss between 2 groups (P>0.05). But fluoroscopy times of control group were significantly higher than those of trial group (P<0.05). One case had radicular symptoms after operation in control group. The patients of 2 groups were followed up 24-36 months (mean, 26 months). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain at last follow-up were significantly better than pre-operative scores in 2 groups (P<0.05); VAS score of low back pain in trial group at last follow-up was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). The accuracy rate of pedicle screw was 81.9% (118/144) in control group and 91.7% (110/120) in trial group, showing significant difference (χ2=5.25, P=0.03). There was significant difference in SSA between 2 groups at immediate after operation (t=-6.21, P=0.00). At immediate after operation and last follow-up, Taillard index, disc height recovery rate, and sagittal angle recovery rate in trial group were significantly better than those in control group (P<0.05). ConclusionPLIF by individualized reference model of sagittal curves by 3D printing technique and computer-aided navigation system can effectively correct spondylolisthesis, recover the lumbar sagittal angle and improve the VAS score of low back pain though it has similar operation time and blood loss to traditional PLIF.
Objective To explore the clinical application value of the spinal robot-assisted surgical system in mild to moderate lumbar spondylolisthesis and evaluate the accuracy of its implantation. Methods The clinical data of 56 patients with Meyerding grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 28 cases were preoperatively planned with robotic arm and percutaneous pedicle screw placement according to preoperative planning (group A); the other 28 cases underwent fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, slippage type, Meyerding grade, and surgical segmental distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). The screw insertion angle was measured by CT, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by Neo’s criteria, and the invasion of superior articular process was evaluated by Babu’s method. Results One hundred and twelve screws were implanted in the two groups respectively, 5 screws (4.5%) in group A and 26 screws (23.2%) in group B penetrated the lateral wall of pedicle, and the difference was significant (χ2=9.157, P=0.002); the accuracy of nail implantation was assessed according to Neo’s criteria, the results were 107 screws of degree 0, 3 of degree 1, 2 of degree 2 in group A, and 86 screws of degree 0, 16 of degree 1, 6 of degree 2, 4 of degree 3 in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups (Z=4.915, P=0.031). In group B, 20 (17.9%) screws penetrated the superior articular process, while in group A, 80 screws were removed from the decompression side, and only 3 (3.8%) screws penetrated the superior articular process. According to Babu’s method, the degree of screw penetration into the facet joint was assessed. The results were 77 screws of grade 0, 2 of grade 1, 1 of grade 2 in group A, and 92 screws of grade 0, 13 of grade 1, 4 of grade 2, 3 of grade 3 in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups (Z=7.814, P=0.029). The screw insertion angles of groups A and B were (23.5±6.6)° and (18.1±7.5)° respectively, showing significant difference (t=3.100, P=0.003). Conclusion Compared to fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement, robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement has the advantages such as greater accuracy, lower incidence of screw penetration of the pedicle wall and invasion of the facet joints, and has a better screw insertion angle. Combined with MIS-TLIF, robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement is an effective minimally invasive treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the early effctiveness of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.MethodsBetween January 2016 and December 2016, 21 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with OLIF and pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach. There were 9 males and 12 females, aged 57-73 years, with an average age of 64.5 years. The disease duration was 24-60 months, with an average of 34.6 months. All cases were spondylolisthesis at L4 (15 cases of degreeⅠ, 6 cases of degreeⅡ); 1 case had vertebral arch isthmus, and 20 cases had spinal stenosis. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation and at last follow-up. Before operation and at 2 days after operation, anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT were taken to measure the sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal, and calculate the intervertebral height and degree of spondylolisthesis. At 6 months after operation, the intervertebral fusion was evaluated by CT.ResultsThe operation time was 120-180 minutes, with an average of 155 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 100-340 mL, with an average of 225.5 mL. One patient had slight injury of lower endplate, 1 patient had numbness of thigh and weakness of hip flexion after operation, 1 patient had sympathetic nerve trunk injury. All the cases were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 14.3 months. The symptoms of low back pain, leg pain, and numbness of lower limbs significantly relieved after operation, and there was no complication such as protrusion of fusion cage, screw breakage, and endplate collapse. At 2 days after operation, the intervertebral height, degree of spondylolisthesis, sagittal diameter of spinal canal, and cross-sectional area of spinal canal significantly improved compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, CT showed that 1 patient had poor interbody fusion (grade Ⅲ), the other 20 patients had good interbody fusion (grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ), and the interbody fusion rate was 95.2%. At last follow-up, JOA score of lumbar spine significantly increased compared with that before operation (t=24.980, P=0.000).ConclusionOLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for the lumbar spondylolisthesis has minimally invasive features, such as less trauma, fewer complications, and higher intervertebral fusion rate. It is a safe and effective method.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) and Wiltse-approach TLIF (W-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. MethodsThe clinical data of 47 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who met the selection criteria between July 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, in which 21 patients were treated with PE-TLIF (PE-TLIF group) and 26 patients were treated with W-TLIF (W-TLIF group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, disease duration, level of spondylolisthesis vertebrae, spondylolisthesis degree, spondylolisthesis type, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain and leg pain, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), and Taillard index (TI) of the operated vertebrae (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative bedridden time, and complications were compared between the two groups. The VAS score and JOA score were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and function. At last follow-up, DH, SL, and TI of operated vertebrae were measured by X-ray films, and lumbar CT was performed to evaluate the interbody fusion. Results Compared with W-TLIF group, the operation time in PE-TLIF group was significantly longer, but the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage were significantly less, and the postoperative bedridden time was significantly shorter (P<0.05). There were 2 cases of transient lower limb radiating pain in PE-TLIF group and 1 case of superficial incision infection in W-TLIF group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (9.5% vs. 3.8%) between the two groups (χ2=0.037, P=0.848). The patients in both groups were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 17.3 months in PE-TLIF group and 17.7 months in W-TLIF group. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain, and the JOA scores of the two groups significantly improved at each time point after operation when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Compared with W-TLIF group, the VAS scores of low back pain in PE-TLIF group significantly lower at 3 days and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), and the JOA score of PE-TLIF group was significantly higher at 3 months after operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in each score at any other time point between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the DH, SL, and TI of operated vertebrae of the two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the differences of each parameter between the two groups (P>0.05). According to Suk’s standard, the fusion rates of PE-TLIF group and W-TLIF group were 90.5% (19/21) and 92.3% (24/26), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). At last follow-up, there was no case of Cage sunk into the adjacent vertebral body, or dislodgement of Cage anteriorly or posteriorly in both groups. Conclusion PE-TLIF and W-TLIF are both effective in the treatment of grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis. Although the operation time is prolonged, PE-TLIF has less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative bedridden time, and can get more obvious short-term improvement of low back pain and function.