Objective To compare the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone(IVTA) injection and IVTA combined with macular laser grid photocoagulation（MLGP）to treat macular edema.Methods Consecutive 89 patients （109 eyes）diagnosed with macular edema by examinations of ocular fundus and optical coherence tomography (OCT).The visual acuity was hand moving-0.8 (0.19plusmn;0.13)；the intraocular pressure（IOP）ranged from 7 mm Hg to 21 mm Hg（1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa）and the average IOP was 13.78 mm Hg.All the patients received OCT and microperimetry examinations，the central macular thickness was （570plusmn;182）mu;m；the average light sensitivity was （5.07plusmn;3.94） dB and the fixation percentage was 70.67% within 4 deg;area around the macular fovea. All the patients received IVTA treatment，39 patients（48 eyes）further received MLGP 1 month later (IVTAMLGP group). The remaining 50 patients (61 eyes) without MLGP treatment was the IVTA group. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),IOP,lens,OCT and microprimetry examinations before and after IVTA (1,3,6,12 months) were followed and analyzed.Results On the 12th months，the BCVA in IVTAMLGP and IVTA group was （0.41plusmn;0.20）、（0.24plusmn;0.19）respectively (P＜0.05)；the central macular thickness was （309plusmn;187） and （487plusmn;206） mu;m respectively（P＜0.05）；the mean light sensitivity of 4deg; central macular was （8.24plusmn;4.64）and（6.30plusmn;3.22）dB respectively（P＜0.05）；the fixation percentage was（87.01plusmn;19.70）% and（78.85plusmn;20.41）% respectively （P＜0.05）. During the followup recurrent macular edema was noticed in 28 eyes of IVTA group and 8 eyes of IVTAMLGP group.Conclusions IVTA combined with MLG was more effective than IVTA to cure macular edema.
Objective To evaluate the long-term result of vitrectomy for macular epiretinal membranes(ERM) and the relationship between bestcorrected visual acuity(VA) and macular thickness. Methods In a retrospective consecutive series, twenty-two eyes(17eyes of idiopathic（77％） and 5 of secondary ERM（23％）) of 2 2 patients with macular ERM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and membrane peeling which had more than 1 yearprime;s (12.40 months，mean(23plusmn;8)months)follow up were included. All the patients were examined by VA, fundus color photography, fluo rescein fundus angiography (FFA) optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after treatment. VA was adopted 5 points record; FFA and OCT were underway as common way. The mean of VA was (4.25plusmn;0.36), the mean of macular thickness was (4.99 plusmn;114) mu;m. Compared the VA, appearance of fundus photography, fluorescein angio graphy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after surgery. Results Visual improvement was achieved in 13 eyes (59%), meanwhile, 6 eyes (27%) were s table and 3 eyes (14%) were worse; VA of 15 eyes (66%) was more than 4.5 at last follow-up. The mean VA increased from (4.25plusmn;0.36) to (457plusmn;031) postope rative ly, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Mean macular thi cknes s decreased from (499plusmn;114) mu;m (317-774 mu;m) to (286plusmn;104) mu;m (150-597 mu;m) (P＜0.05) postoperatively, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05), but still different to the opposite eyesprime;((184plusmn;37) mu;m)(P＜0.05).VA correlated with macular thickness preoperatively (r=-0.64,P=0.001)and postoperat ively(r=-0.58, P=0.01) except the patients with cataract improvement without therapy. 6 eyes(27%) had retinal hemorrhage and 2 eyes(9%) had peripheral retinal breaks intraoperati vely; 5 eyes(23%) had secondary higher intraocular pressure, 1 eye(5%) had macul a hole and 8 eyes(36%) had cataract improvement postoperatively. Conclusions Surgery is successful in treating ERM. It can relieve macular edema and improve visual acuity. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2008，24：206-209）
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and security of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsA total of 41 eyes in 37 patients with macular edema who measured up were collected, including 21 eyes of 21 cases in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) group, 17 eyes of 13 cases in diabetic retinopathy (DR) group, and 3 eyes of 3 cases in the other-causes group. Before the treatment, the average visual acuity was 0.07, 0.06, and 0.08 in the 3 groups respectively, and the mean thickness of macular fovea detected by optic coherence tomography (OCT) was (974±394) and (873±213) in RVO and DR group, respectively. Intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA (40 mg/ml) was performed on each patient. The average follow-up duration was 8 months after the treatment. The visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), changes of lens and ocular fundus, and retinal thichness at macular area before and after the treatment was observed and compared.ResultsAll eyes except one had improved visual acuity. The mean visual acuity improved to 0.25, 0.20, and 0.35 in the 3 groups respectively 6 months after the treatment. Alleviated or reducing macular edema was found in all of the patients. The average retinal thickness at macular fovea was (173±41) and (204±76) in RVO and DR group respectively 1 month after the treatment, which had statistical significance compared with that before the treatment (t =8.323, 6.842; P＜0.01). The intraocular pressure was ＞21 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) in 6 eyes (14.6%), which mostly happened 1 week to 2 months after the injection, and was controlled to normal level after partially treated with βreceptor retarder. The cataract developed in 1 eye, and another patient with macular edema after vitrectomy due to diabetes had macular hole 2 months after the injection. There were 2 eyes underwent intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA 4-5 months after the first treatment due to the recurrence of macular edema in RVO and DR group respectively.ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA is a promising therapeutic method for macular edema that fails to respond to conventional treatment. Transient elevation of ocular pressure is the most common side effect. Further study is needed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:209-212)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on macular edema.MothodHaving been examined by ophthalmoscopy, optic coherent tomography (OCT), retinal thickness analyzer (RTA), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), 33 patients (37 eyes) with diffused and (or) cystoid macular edema caused by diabetes and retinal venous occlusion were intravitreously injected with 0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). During 1-9 month followup period, the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, inflammatory extent, manifestation of lens and fundus were observed, the retinal thickness was examined by OCT and RTA, and vascular leakage were detected by FFA.ResultsMacular thickness was (244.07±118.80), (195.53±57.70), and (181.42±54.79) μm respectively 1, 2, 3 months after treatment; while macular thickness was (724.35±227.41) μm before the treatment. The difference was statistically significant （t =10.72, 12.84, 13.90; P lt;0.001）. The visual acuity was 0.39±0.19, 0.45±0.24, and 0.43±0.21 respectively, comparing with the visual acuity before the treatment (0.20±0.16), the difference was statistically significant （t =4.445, 4.349, 3.474; P lt;0.001, lt;0.001, 0.03）；The result of FFA showed less leakage of fluorescein and proliferative lesion. Four pateints had the ocular pressure ≥25 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) in 9 who had ≥20 mm Hg. Recurrence of macular edema was found in 4 eyes of 3 patients 4 and 6 months after the treatment, respectively. No infection or aggravation of lenticular turbidness occurred.ConclusionIntravitreous injection with TA can be used to treat macular edema due to diabetes and retinal venous occlusion, and recurrence of macular edema or increase of intraocular pressure may occur in some patients.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:205-208)
ObjectiveTo observe the therapeutic effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on diffused diabetic macular edema.MethodsIntravitreous injection with TA was performed on 21 patients with diabetic macular edema who had undergone ocular-fundus examination, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The followup duration was 1 month, 3, and 6 months. The visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and retinal thickness at the macular area before and after the treatment, examined by ETDRS eye chart, noncontact tonometer, and OCT respectively, were observed and compared.ResultsOne month, 3, and 6 months after the injection, the mean extent of improvement of visual acuity was 7.5, 9.1 (including 2-line improvement in 10 eyes which occupied 48%), and 5.1 letters respectively; while the decrease of retinal thickness at macula was 143 μm (decrease of 33%), 184 μm (decrease of 42%), and 151 μm (decrease of 35%) respectively.ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA is effective for diffused diabetic macular edema in a short term (about 3 months).(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:217-219)
Objective To explore the correlation between retinal extracellular edema and vitreous contraction in rabbits. Methods Seventeen pigmented rabbit models with retinal vein occlusion (RVO)was set up by laser photocoagulation. Retinal vascularity area was pathologically examined 1 month later.The vitreous gellength under the gravity condition and the percentage of its weight in the rabbits with extraeellular edema was observed. The mechanisms were investigated by Western immunoblotting of type II collagen.Results Extracellular edema was found in 13 experimental eyes 1 month after the formation of RVO (76.5~) with contracted vitreous gel and released watery liquid, and the a component of type II collagen was cross-linked together to form high-molecular-weight components of 1] and 7, which weakened the stability of collagen net structure.Conclusions Vitreous contraction and retinal extracellular edemawere correlated. The main reason may be the cross-links of vitreous collagen that damages the stability of collagen structure. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2004，20：2-32)
ObjectiveTo probe the classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the different grade of diabetic and type of macular edema according to fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). MethodsFFA was performed on 1 058 patients (2 097 eyes) to classify DR and macular edema with the analysis of duration of DM, visual acuity, manifestation of FFA images and results of ophthalmoscopic examination.ResultsIn 2 097 eyes, there were 124 (5.9%) without DR, 396 (18.9%) with DR I, 430 (20.5%) with DR II, 563 (26.8%) with DR III, 262 (125%) with preproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PPDR), 254 (12.%) with DR IV, 60 (2.9%) with DR V, and 8 (0.4%) with DR VI. In 2 097 eyes there were 819 (39.1%) with macular edema, including 311 (38%) with focal macular edema, 322 (39.3%) with diffused macular edema, 112 (13.7%) with cystoid macular edema, 25 (3.1%) with ischemia macular edema, and 49 (6.0%) with proliferative macular edema.ConclusionWith the analysis of the results of FFA of 2 097 eyes, we classify DR in stage Ⅰ (primary stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ), Ⅱ (primary stage Ⅲ), Ⅲ (preproliferative diabetic retinopathy), Ⅳ,Ⅴ, and Ⅵ; classify macular edema of DR in focal, diffused, cystoid, ischemic, and proliferating ones.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2003,19:333-337)