west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Malignant obstructive jaundice" 4 results
  • Evaluation of Imaging Examinations in Diagnosis of Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

    ObjectiveTo study the diagnostic value of imaging examinations and their accuracy in evaluating the malignant obstructive jaundice and their resectability. MethodsThe clinical data of 674 malignant obstructive jaundice within 10 years were collected and analyzed.ResultsFor BUS, CT, PTC, ERCP and MRCP, the preoperative accuracy in malignant obstructive jaundice were 74.0%, 86.5%, 88.4%, 92.9% and 94.0%, while the ratio of actual removals in those who had been assessed removable preoperatively were 63.4%, 68.5%, 86.8%, 87.3% and 93.9%, respectively. Conclusion MRCP, PTC, CT and ERCP are better than BUS in the diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice (P<0.05 vs. P<0.01), while MRCP,ERCP and PTC are much better than BUS and CT in evaluating resectability (P<0.01). Combination of two or more imaging examinations can improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and assessing resectability.

    Release date:2016-08-28 05:11 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison Between Interventional Treatment and Operation Drainage for Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

    Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) and operation drainage for the patients with inoperable malignant obstructive jaundice. Methods A total of 131 patients with inoperable malignant obstructive jaundice were treated in this hospital, in which 102 patients had PTCD by placement of metallic stent and (or) plastic tubes to remove obstruction of bile duct (interventional treatment group). Simultaneously 29 patients were selected for operation by intraexternal drainage (operation drainage group). The patients were followed up for comparison of the serum level of total bilirubin, postoperative complications, average length of hospitalization and average cost between the two groups. Results PTCD was successfully performed in all the patients of the interventional treatment group. There were no significant differences of 50% decrease period of average total bilirubin level or postoperative complications between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The average length of hospitalization and average cost of interventional treatment group were less than those of operation drainage group (Plt;0.05). Conclusions Compare with operation drainage, interventional treatment can reduce average length of hospitalization and average cost, without increase of postoperative complications, which is a main chance of treatment for malignant obstructive jaundice.

    Release date:2016-09-08 04:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Prevention of Postoperative Acute Renal Failure in Patients with Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

    Objective To investigate the protection of renal function and the prevention of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice in perioperative period of radical resection. Methods A series of clinical interventions had been taken since 2004 in our treatment team, including control of endotoxemia, depression of biliary tract before operation, maintenance of adequate effective blood volume, nutritive support, administration of mannitol and low dose of furosemide, and avoidance of disseminated intravascular coagulation. The incidence of perioperative ARF in 206 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who had been radically resected from 2000 to 2007 was retrospectively studied, and the RIFLE criteria was used for ARF classification. This study was progressed in two periods. The first one was from Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2003, and the second one was from Jan. 2004 to Dec. 2007. Results After 2003, the proportion of radical resection rose from 44.8% to 57.1% (P<0.05), and the rate of perioperative ARF dropped from 15.1% to 6.7%(P<0.05), among which the proportion in the RIFLE-R (Risk) stage had no significant change, while in the RIFLE-F (Failure) stage it dropped from 10.5% to 2.5% (P<0.05). Finally, perioperative mortality rate dropped from 16.3% to 5.8% (P<0.05). Therefore, the reduction of ARF was mainly attributed to the reduction in RIFLE-F stage. Conclusion By using the latest RIFLE criteria to classify ARF, it illustrates that our perioperative interventions have effectively decreased ARF, limited ARF in its early and reversible stage, and prevented advancing.

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Compative Study of Biliary Metallic Stent Implantation Via ERCP and PTCD Approaches in Treatment of Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

    ObjectiveTo compare clinical effect of biliary metallic stent implantation via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) approaches in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice. MethodsOne hundred and thirty-six patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who received the biliary metallic stent implantation from June 2010 to June 2015 in this hospital were selected. There were 53 cases via ERCP approach (ERCP group), in which 44 patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice, 9 patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice. There were 83 cases via PTCD approach (PTCD group), in which 24 patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice, 59 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. The surgical success rate, effective rate, incidence of postoperative complications, hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses were compared in these two groups. Results① The total surgical success rate had no significant difference between the ERCP group and the PTCD group (P > 0.05). The surgical success rate of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ② The total effective rate had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05), which of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ③ The hospital stay of the ERCP group was significantly shorter than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). The hospitalization expenses had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05). ④ The total incidence of complications in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe biliary metallic stent implantation via ERCP and PTCD approaches in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice could all obtain a better clinical efficacy. It has more advantages in patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice via ERCP approach and in the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice via PTCD approach.

    Release date:2016-10-02 04:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content