The artificial ventilation system is a multi-factor system with some high uncertain risks which should be under controlled by medical risk management of hospitals. The key suggestions for reducing the accidence caused by ventilator are recommented： 1 ） to clarify the risk factor of ventilators, 2 ） to set up management group of ventilators with a clinical engineer who is good at management and quality control of medical equipment on ventilators, 3 ） to develop ventilator clinical practice for safety use, 4 ） to explore the effective risk monitoring and early warning system and mechanism on ventilator application.
Objective To introduce the basic information about mad cow disease and the current status of safety control of medical devices derived from mammalian animal tissues. Methods Literature concernedwas reviewed intensively. Results Mad cow disease, also knownas bovine spongiform encephacitis (BSE)， is generally considered from the samesource of Scrapie, and they are caused by the same kind of sponginess brain tissue pathological changes. Mad cow disease is caused by the misfolding of a small protein called Prion. This disease has the character of slowly breaking down the central neuron system of animals. Conclusion Further researches can provide evaluation for safety considerations of medical devices deriving from animal.
ObjectiveTo analyze the current situation and international research focuses on the study of medical device risk management. MethodsTo retrieve medical device risk management literature information cited from 2002 to 2011 in PubMed such as high-frequency MeSH; analyze current situation and research focuses of medical device risk management by using bibliometrics, bibliographic item co-occurrence matrix builder (BICOMB), and graphical clustering toolkit (gCluto) for quantitative analysis, high-frequency MeSH term papers cluster visualization analysis. ResultsA total of 7 073 published studies were retrieved, basically suggesting a gradually increasing trend of the number of published papers. The top 3 numbers of first authors' papers referred to three countries: the United States, Britain and Germany, while China ranked twelfth. The top 3 numbers of journal articles referred to the United States, Britain and Holland, while China ranked twenty-second. Twenty journals published more than 50 papers, and all these journals were clinical journals. Thirty-three authors published no less than 5 papers, with the maximum of 18 articles. Totally, there were 124 highfrequency MeSHs. The high-frequency MeSHs were classified into 6 categories by using double cluster analysis: kinds 0 to 4 included risk report, risk analysis, risk assessment and methodology of heart valve prosthesis, coronary stents, peripheral vascular stents, implantable defibrillators and other life support device, surgical repair surgical flaps and minimal invasion surgical device such as laparoscopy; kind 5 focused on safety management, risk control, organization and implementation and other related research based on prevention and control of medical device adverse reaction, medical errors, occupation exposure, and equipment failure. ConclusionThe analysis on international literature on medical device risk management basically shows a gradually increasing trend; most studies published in the clinical medicine journals; research focus on risk assessment, safety management and quality improvement in the application such as angioplasty, artificial prosthesis replacement, plastic surgery, minimally invasive surgery and critical care medicine, and radiology diagnosis and treatment; implantable, life-supported invasive and radiological devices as the main research subject; and characteristics include closely combination between medical device risk management and the application of safe and effective, quality improvement systems for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Real-world data (RWD) in clinical research on specific categories of medical devices can generate sufficient quality evidence which will be used in decision making. This paper discusses the limitations of traditional randomized controlled trials in clinical research of medical devices, summarizes and analyses the applicable conditions of real-world evidence (RWE) for medical devices, interprets the new FDA guidance document on the characteristics of RWD for medical devices, in order to provide evidence for the use of RWE in medical devices in our country.
Medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) is a kind of pressure injury that occurs in the course of diagnosis and treatment, and its appearance is similar to that of medical device. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants are more likely to develop MDRPI than children and adults because of the physiological characteristics of skin and the influence of disease. At present, the occurrence of MDRPI in NICU infants is attracting worldwide attention. Its treatment and nursing consume a large amount of medical resources, which not only affect the outcome of the disease, but also increase the economic burden of the family and society. This article summarizes the MDRPI from three aspects: summary, influencing factors, and evaluation tools. It is expected that NICU nurses will carry out large sample clinical investigation of MDRPI in the future, so as to provide a reference for risk prediction model and risk assessment tools to identify high-risk infants and take effective measures in advance to reduce the incidence of MDRPI.
Regulatory science of medical devices serves the scientific research and regulatory activities for supervision of medical devices. Principles of science and transparency and conduction of evidence-based study, which is advocated in Evidence-based science(EBS), also apply to regulatory science of medical devices, including using evidence-based scientific tools and methods to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness, as well as quality, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of total life cycle of medical products, target customers, and scope. EBS provides both new methods and tools for regulatory science for medical devices, and provides a new basis for further scientific regulatory decisions.
Real-world data is been increasingly valued nowadays. This paper combined with related requirements of clinical evaluation of medical devices in China, studied the role of real-world evidence in pre-marketing clinical evaluation of medical devices in terms of technical evaluation, in aim of providing reference for the future application of China's real-world evidence in pre-marketing clinical evaluation.
In 2019, the national government issued the document "Implementation Plan for Supporting the Construction of the Boao Lecheng International Medical Tourism Pilot Area", which allowed the use of innovative drugs and medical devices in medical institution of Boao Lecheng. These medical products had been designed to meet urgent clinical requirements and had been approved by regulatory authorities overseas. Through the use of these medical products, real-world data were generated in the routine clinical practice, based on which real-world evidence might be produced for regulatory decision-making by using scientific and rigorous methods. In March 2020, the first medical device product using domestic real-world data was approved, suggesting that the real-world data initiative in Boao Lecheng achieved initial success. This work also provided important experience for promoting the practice of medical device regulatory decision-making based on real-world evidence in China. Here, we shared the preliminary experiences from the study on the first approved medical device product and discussed the issues on developing a real-world data research framework in Boao Lecheng in attempt to offer insights for future studies.
Health technology assessment is a systematic assessment of the nature and impact of health technology. It is a science that solves the problems of health intervention or health technology on society, economy, organization and ethics. Aiming at the current issues of availability, accessibility, affordability, rationality and safety in the field of medical devices, health technology assessment can systematically evaluate the characteristics, effects and impact of medical devices, and provide evidence-based basis for scientific decision-making. Starting from the current status and challenges of medical device management, this paper introduces the origin and development, basic scope, assessment process and main assessment content of health technology assessment, and introduces the application of health technology assessment in medical device management through case studies, so as to promote development of health technology assessment in the field of medical device management and make medical device management more scientific and standardized.
The pre-market approval and clinical application of innovative medical devices should be based on high-quality evidence, proving their reliability, safety and effectiveness. In 2016, the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term follow-up) collaboration modified the original IDEAL framework and recommendation to the IDEAL-D methodological framework for the entire life cycle evaluation of innovative medical devices. The framework included five stages, namely the preclinical development stage, idea stage, exploration stage, assessment stage and long-term follow-up stage. This paper aims to interpret the study purpose, content and design at each step of the IDEAL-D framework based on IDEAL framework and recommendation (2019) to provide practical methodological guidance for the design and conduct of clinical research on innovative medical devices.