Objective To evaluate the short-term cl inical outcomes of metal-on-metal total hi p resurfacing arthroplasty in treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in young and middle-aged patients and to compare with patients of hip osteoarthritis at the same period. Methods From July 2006 to October 2008, 33 patients (45 hips) with ONFH (ONFH group) and 39 patients (45 hips) with osteoarthritis (osteoarthritis group) were treated with metal-on-metal total hipresurfacing arthroplasty. In ONFH group, there were 18 males (27 hips) and 15 females (18 hips) with an average age of 42.7 years (range 19-58 years), including 22 left hips and 23 right hips. The causes were trauma (4 cases), glucocorticoid (25 cases), drugs (2 cases), alcohol (1 case), and psoriasis (1 case). According to Steinberg classification, there were 10 hips at stage III, 18 hips at stage IV a, 13 hips at stage IV b, and 4 hips at stage IV c. The Harris score was 52.0 ± 4.6. The disease course was 1-12 years. In osteoarthritis group, there were 26 males (30 hips) and 13 females (15 hips) with an average age of 47.1 years (range 42-65 years), including 17 left hips and 28 right hips. The causes were degenerative arthritis (23 cases), trauma (11 cases), and ankylosing spondyl itis (5 cases). The Harris score was 57.0 ± 3.8. The disease course was 3-17 years. There were no significant differences in general data between two groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions achieved heal ing by first intention without compl ications of infection and thrombosis of deep vein of lower extremities. The patients were followed up for 26 months in ONFH group and 28 months in osteoarthritis group. Femoral neck fracture occurred in 1 case of osteoarthritis group after 4 months, who received total hip arthroplasty; no compl ication of prosthesis loosening, dislocation, incision infection, osteonecrosis, and bone absorption occurred in other patients. At last follow-up, the Harris scores were 93.0 ± 5.5 in ONFH group and 94.0 ± 2.4 in osteoarthritis group, showing no significant difference between two groups (P gt; 0.05); but there were significant differences between pre- and post-operation (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion The cl inical short-term outcomes ofmetal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty to treat ONFH are satisfactory. It can achieve similar outcomes to that ofosteoarthritis group. More cases and long-term follow-up are needed to investigate long-term cl inical outcomes.
【Abstract】 Objective To review the recent progress of hi p resurfacing arthroplasty. Methods Literatureconcerning hip resurfacing arthroplasty and current achievements was extensively and comprehensively reviewed. Results The new metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty made much progress especially in materials and technology, and the results were satisfactory for short-term follow-up. This was increasingly widely used especially in treating young patients. But there were still some problems such as elevation of metal ions which had already aroused publ ic attention. Conclusion The new metal-onmetal hip resurfacing arthroplasty is an efficient method in the treatment of adult hip joint disease and has an encouraging future, but long-term follow-up is still needed.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in young and middle-aged patients. MethodsBetween January 2008 and April 2009, 34 patients with ONFH underwent HRA. There were 19 males and 15 females with an average age of 54 years (range, 33-59 years). Of 34 cases, 16 left hips and 18 right hips were involved, including 9 cases of alcoholinduced ONFH, 8 cases of steroid-induced ONFH, 7 cases of traumatic ONFH, and 10 cases of unexplained ONFH. According to modified Ficat classification system, 26 hips were rated as stage III, and 8 hips as stage IV. The Harris hip score (HHS) and modified University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were used to evaluate the clinical results. Migration of prosthesis was assessed on the anteroposterior radiographs. The abduction angle was measured on the acetabular side. On the femoral side, varus-valgus shift was determined by measurement of stem-shaft angle. The axial collapse of femoral component was assessed with the component-lateral cortex ratio. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was achieved in all patients without complications of infection and thrombosis of deep vein of lower extremities. Thirty-two patients were followed up 78 months on average (range, 70-84 months). No implant loosening, infection, femoral neck fracture, dislocation, and inflammatory pseudotumor were observed. At last follow-up, the HHS score was significantly increased to 95.22±1.47 from preoperative 50.10±2.27 (t=1.510, P=0.008). Modified UCLA activity score was significantly increased to 7.70±1.13 from preoperative 3.90±0.90 (t=0.830, P=0.003). The abduction angle, stemshaft angle, and compotent-lateral cortex ratio showed no significant difference between at 3 days after operation and last follow-up (P>0.05). ConclusionIf the indication of operation is mastered strictly, HRA may be effective in treatment for ONFH at Ficat stage III or IV in young and middle-aged patients.