Objective To compare the effectiveness between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fracture. Methods Between March 2009 and March 2012, 57 patients with extra-articular distal tibial fractures were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 57 cases, 31 were treated with MIPO (MIPO group), and 26 with ORIF (ORIF group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type of fractures, complication, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were compared between 2 groups. Results There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Wound infection occurred in 5 cases [2 in MIPO group (6.5%) and 3 in ORIF group (11.5%)], showing no significant difference (χ2=0.651, P=0.499). The other wound obtained healing by first intention. All cases were followed up 13-24 months (mean, 15 months). No significant difference was found in the average healing time between 2 groups and between patients with types A and B by AO classification (P gt; 0.05); in patients with type C, the healing time in MIPO group was significantly shorter than that in ORIF group (t= — 2.277, P=0.033). Delayed union was observed in 3 cases of MIPO group (9.7%) and in 4 cases of ORIF group (15.4%), showing no significant difference (χ2=0.428, P=0.691). Mal-union occurred in 4 cases of MIPO group (12.9%) and in 1 case of ORIF group (3.8%), showing no significant difference (χ2=1.449, P=0.362). No significant difference was found in Mazur score between 2 groups (t=0.480, P=0.633). The excellent and good rate was 93.5% in MIPO group (excellent in 24 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case) and was 92.3% in ORIF group (excellent in 18 cases, good in 6 cases, and poor in 2 cases), and the difference was not significant (Z= — 0.687, P=0.492). Conclusion Both MIPO and ORIF have good results in treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures. MIPO is superior to ORIF for treating complex and communited fractures.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fracture. Methods From July 2004 to April 2008, 26 patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humeral shaft were recruited, including 8 males and 18 females. Age of patients averaged 66 years old (range, 34-82 years old). According to AO classification, there were 4 cases of type A1, 2 cases of type A2, 8 cases of type B1, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1 and 2 cases of type C2. The time from injury to surgery averaged 2 days (range, 1-5 days). There were 8 osteoporotic fractures. Results All surgical wound healed primarily, and there was no wound infection. Three patients had postoperative radial nerve neurapraxia, which recovered at 4, 6, 8 months respectively. All patients were followed up for 6-24 months with an average of 14.1 months. Radiological examination revealed bony union within 6 months in 25 cases. There was 1 delayed union which remained asymptomatic and eventually healed at 8 months with acceptable Constant-Murley score. There were 3 cases of shoulder impingement syndrome diagnosed at 3 months post-operatively. After implant removal, they all achieved an acceptable Constant-Murley score. According to Constant-Murley scoring system, there were 11 excellent, 10 good and 5 acceptable results. The excellent or good rate was 80.8%. Conclusion MIPO technique using LCP is an effective method to treat proximal humeral shaft fractures, which facil itates functional recovery of the shoulder joint. During the surgery, it is important to achieve a good fracture reduction and to avoid compl ications.
Objective To evaluates the appl ication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique in treatment of distal tibia fractures with locking compression plate (LCP). Methods From August 2002 to August 2007, 62 subjects were recruited (36 males and 26 females) at mean age of 44 years old (range, 21-87 years old). According to AOclassification, there were 8 cases of type A1, 15 cases of type A2, 9 cases of type A3, 7 cases of type B3, 11 cases of type C1, and 12 cases of type C2. Of them, 52 patients had closed fractures and 10 had open fractures. Ten open fractures included 6 Grade I fracture and 4 Grade II fracture. The time from injury to operation was 8 hours to 6 days. The X-ray films were taken after 3 months of operation. Results Near anatomical reduction was achieved in 56 fractures and acceptable reduction in 6 fractures. Mean operation time was 43 minutes (range, 37-120 minutes). Primary heal ing of surgical wounds was observed in all cases. Subjects were followed up for 23 months on average (ranged, 18-45 months). All fractures healed with a mean heal ing time of 19.5 weeks (range, 16-32 weeks). According to Teeny and Wiss ankle scoring system, 30 patients got excellent results, 25 good, and 7 fair; and the excellent and good rate was 88.7% at 12-month follow-up. There were 7 cases of delayed soft tissue infection which needed implant removal. There was one compl ication of compartment syndrome which required fasciotomy. There was one case with loss of reduction (valgus tilting of tibial plafond) that required bone grafting. Conclusion The results of MIPO LCP in treatment of distal tibia fractures were satisfactory. This technique was safe with no incidence of serious compl ications.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of anterior and lateral approaches of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. MethodsThe clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and compared from 35 cases of humeral shaft fractures between January 2010 and December 2012. The patients underwent MIPO by anterior approach in 17 patients (group A) and by lateral approach in 18 patients (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury causes, type of fractures, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, fracture healing time, intra- or postoperative complications, and shoulder and elbow range of motion (ROM) values were recorded and analyzed. The functions of the affected shoulder and elbow were assessed with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Mayo elbow performance score system respectively. ResultsThe operation time was (91.35±8.00) minutes and (95.56±7.92) minutes in groups A and B respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-1.561, P=0.128). Incision healed by first intention in all patients of 2 groups. No iatrogenic radial nerve palsy occurred in group A, 2 cases had postoperative iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in group B, showing no significant difference (P=0.486). The patients were followed up 15.4 months on average (range, 11-24 months) in group A and 16.8 months on average (range, 10-23 months) in group B. The X-ray films showed bony healing in all patients. The fracture union time was (13.5±2.1) weeks in group A and (14.0±2.2) weeks in group B, showing no significant difference (t=-0.696, P=0.491). The UCLA scores were 33.4±1.9 in group A and 30.6±2.0 in group B, and the Mayo elbow performance scores were 100 in group A and 96.4±2.8 in group B; all showed significant differences (t=4.231, P=0.000; t=5.293, P=0.000). ConclusionGood clinical outcomes could be obtained when humeral shaft fractures are treated with MIPO either by anterior approach or by lateral apporach. However, anterior approach could offer better shoulder and elbow functional results.