Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of nedaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) for advanced esophageal cancer. Methods Such databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from the date of their establishment to May 4th, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about nedaplatin combined with 5-Fu versus cisplatin combined with 5-Fu for advanced esophageal cancer. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 15 RCTs invloving 863 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis suggested that, compared with cisplatin combined with 5-Fu, nedaplatin combined with 5-Fu could improve short-term effects (RR=1.31, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.52, P=0.000 2) and reduce gastrointestinal reaction and renal function impairment, but it was associated with aggravated myelosuppression, increase of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, and decrease of hemoglobin. There were no significant differences between the two groups in liver function impairment, diarrhea and peripheral neurovirulence. Conclusion Nedaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil can increase short-term effects and reduce gastrointestinal reaction and renal function impairment. However, nedaplatin is associated with aggravated myelosuppression, so it should be applied in clinic with cautious. Nedaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil can be used as a replacement chemotherapy regimen for advanced esophageal cancer, but the evidence about long-term effects and safety is still required. For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies which decreases the level of evidence, so the conclusion of this systematic review only provides some references for clinical practice and research.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy versus cisplatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy versus cisplatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC were searched in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data from the date of their establishment to January 2012. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data and assessed the quality. Then RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 15 RCTs involving 1 076 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the cisplatin combined with chemotherapy, nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy could reduce the risks of nausea and vomiting (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.48 to 0.65, Plt;0.000 01), decrease the risk of renal function impairment (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.74, P=0.001), but increase the risk of thrombocytopenia (RR=1.59, 95%CI 1.20 to 2.11, P=0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.29, P=0.03), leukopenia (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.19, P=0.50), and hemoglobin reduction (RR=0.92, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.07, P=0.30). Conclusion Compared with cisplatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients, nedaplatin in combination with chemotherapy can significantly reduce the risks of nausea, vomiting and renal function impairment. Although the ORRs are similar in the two groups, nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy can cause a higher risk of thrombocytopenia. For the quality restriction and possible publication bias of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are required to further verify this conclusion.
ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of weekly nedaplatin compared with weekly cisplatin as postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy scheme for cervical cancer patients.MethodsThis trial was performed in the Department of Radiation Oncology in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from June 2016 to January 2017. A total of 200 patients with stage ⅠB1-ⅡB cervical cancer were randomly assigned to the nedaplatin group and the cisplatin group after signing informed content. The dose of nedaplatin or cisplatin ranged 35 to 40 mg/m2, once a week for 5 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy or three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy were used for patients. The progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse reactions were compared between two groups. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 24.0 software.ResultsA total of 105 patients were enrolled in the nedaplatin group, and 95 patients were in cisplatin group. The three-year progression-free survival rate was 80.5% vs. 79.5% in the nedaplatin group and the cisplatin group, respectively; and no statistical significant difference was found (χ2=0.198, P=0.656) between two groups. The 3-year overall survival rates were 72.5% and 69.9% for the nedaplatin group and the cisplatin group, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.261, P=0.609). The incidence of grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting in the nedaplatin group was 6.67%, which was significantly lower than that of 15.79% in the cisplatin group, and statistical significant difference was found (χ2=2.555, P=0.011); however, the incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in the nedaplatin group was 9.52%, which was significantly higher than that in the cisplatin group (3.15%); and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=1.985, P=0.047). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions such as anemia, neutropenia, and radiological proctitis in both groups.ConclusionsNedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy has similar efficacy compared to cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and it could significantly reduce the digestive tract reaction, which can be used as an alternative to cisplatin.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin versus cisplatin combined with fluorouracil in the treatment of esophageal neoplasms.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and CBM databases were searched by computer to investigate the randomized controlled studies about the clinical effects of nedaplatin combined with fluorouracil versus cisplatin combined with fluorouracil in the treatment of esophageal neoplasms. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to January 2021. And meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.ResultsA total of 12 randomized controlled studies involving 744 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate of the nedaplatin group was better than that of the cisplatin group (P<0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and renal impairment in the nedaplatin group was lower than that in the cisplatin group (P<0.05), but the incidence of leukopenia and hemoglobin decline was higher than that in the cisplatin group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of liver injury, or platelet decline between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionNedaplatin combined with fluorouracil has more advantages than cisplatin combined with fluorouracil in the treatment of esophageal cancer, the incidence of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea is lower, and the damage to kidney function is also smaller.
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine compared with cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Methods The Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI and China General Library of Biomedical Literature were searched. Literatures related to the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine (nedaplatin group) versus cisplatin combined with gemcitabine (cisplatin group) in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma published from the inception to October 2021 were searched. The quality of included studies was assessed by Cochrane bias assessing tool and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4. Results A total of 10 articles were included covering 914 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the objective remission rate (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.13-2.01, P=0.005), disease control rate (OR=1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.15, P=0.01) and 1-year survival rate (OR=2.29, 95%CI 1.25-4.18, P=0.007) of the nedaplatin group were better than those of the cisplatin group. In terms of side effects, the incidence of white blood cell and hemoglobin decline, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea in the nedaplatin group was lower than that in the cisplatin group (P≤0.05). The differences in the platelet decline and liver and kidney damage between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, the short-term efficacy of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine may be better than cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, and the incidence of adverse reactions is lower.