Objective To study the responsiveness change of neutrophils when experiencing the second insult after the initial temperature activation in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by using an in vitro model. Methods The neutrophils were isolated from blood which was drawn from each of 60 health volunteers. The samples were divided into 5 groups including normothermia, tepid temperature, moderate hypothermia, deep hypothermia, and rewarming hyperthermia by random digital table with 12 in each group according to the change of temperature during CPB. An in vitro model for studying neutrophil responsiveness was established by using a polymerase chain reaction thermocycler. Five time points were set for each group, including T0: starting CPB, T1: starting rewarming, T2: 0.5 h after rewarming, T3: 1 h after rewarming, and T4: 1.5 h after rewarming. Platelet activating factor (PAF) was added into each group at T2, T3, and T4, and then the value of membranebound elastase (MBE) activity was measured as responsiveness of neutrophils. Analysis of covariance was applied by using SPSS 13.0 for statistic analysis. If the [CM(159mm]covariance had significant difference between main effects, Bonferroni method would be applied for pairwise comparison. Results The main effect difference of neutrophil responsiveness among different groups was statistically different (F=4.372,P=0.002). MBE value had no statistical difference between the normothermia and tepid temperature groups (81.9±4.5 ng/10.6 cells vs. 76.5±3.6 ng/106 cells, P=0.134). while the MBE values in these two groups were higher than those in the other three groups (P=0.001). MBE value in the rewarming hyperthermia group was higher than that in the deep hypothermia group (61.2±2.7 ng/106 cells vs. 50.9±3.7 ng/106 cells, P=0.005). There was no statistical difference between the moderate hypothermia group (56.4±3.2 ng/106 cells) and the rewarming hyperthermia group (P=0.167), so was it between the moderate hypothermia group and the deep hypothermia group (P=0.107). The main effects of neutrophil responsiveness at different time points was statistically different (F=3.566, P=0.03) when PAF was added. MBE value at T4 was higher thanthat at T2 (70.9±2.5 ng/106 cells vs. 59.9±2.3 ng/106 cells, P=0.027). There was no statistical difference among T3 (65.5±1.8 ng/106 cells), T2 (P=0.168), and T4 (P=0.292) in MBE value. Conclusion Normothermia， tepid temperature， and rewarming hyperthermia during CPB can enhance neutrophil responsiveness and MBE release when neutrophils suffer the second insult. There is a time window for neutrophils to be easily activated during rewarming period.