west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "O-EA angle" 2 results
  • Predictive abilities of O-C2 angle, O-EA angle, and Oc-Ax angle for the development of dysphagia in patients after occipitocervical fusion

    ObjectiveTo compare the predictive abilities of O-C2 angle (O-C2a), O-EA angle (O-EAa), and Oc-Ax angle (Oc-Axa) for development of dysphagia in patients after occipitocervical fusion (OCF).MethodsBetween April 2010 and May 2019, 114 patients who underwent OCF and met the selection criteria were selected as the research objects. Among them, 54 were males and 60 were females; they were 14-76 years old, with an average of 50.6 years old. The follow-up time was 13-122 months (median, 60.5 months). The O-C2a, O-EAa, Oc-Axa, and the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS) were measured by the lateral X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up, and the differences before and after operation (dO-C2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, and dnPAS) were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had developed postoperative dysphagia. The general data including age, gender, fixed segment, proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atlantoaxial subluxation (AS), and combined with anterior release surgery (ARS), and imaging indicators were compared between the two groups. The correlations between dO-C2a, dO-EAa, and dOc-Axa and dnPAS in 114 patients were analyzed to further compare the predictive value of three imaging indicators for occurrence of dysphagia after OCF.ResultsDysphagia occurred after OCF in 31 cases with the incidence of 27.2%. There was significant difference in gender between the dysphagia group and the non-dysphagia group (χ2=7.940, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, fixed segment, the proportion of patients with RA, the proportion of patients with AS, and the proportion of patients combined with ARS (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in O-C2a and Oc-Axa of 114 patients before operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The differences in O-EAa and nPAS were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative O-EAa, Oc-Axa, and nPAS between the dysphagia group and the non-dysphagia group (P>0.05); the difference in the O-C2a was significant (t=2.470, P=0.016). At last follow-up, the differences in the above imaging indicators were significant (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the dO-C2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, and dnPAS between the two groups (P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the dO-C2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa were all positively correlated with dnPAS (P<0.05). The dO-C2a≤−5°, postoperative O-EAa≤100°, postoperative Oc-Axa≤65° were all related to postoperative dysphagia (P<0.05), and the highest risk factor suffering postoperative dysphagia was dO-C2a ≤−5° with a significant OR of 14.4.ConclusionThe dO-C2a, postoperative O-EAa, and postoperative Oc-Axa can be used as the predictive indexes of dysphagia after OCF, among which dO-C2a has the highest predictive value.

    Release date:2021-01-29 03:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Relationship between O-EA angle and lower cervical curvature in patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation before and after occipitocervical fusion

    ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between O-EA angle and lower cervical curvature in patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion, and to analyze the effect of O-EA angle on lower cervical curvature.MethodsThe clinical data of 61 patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion who were admitted between April 2010 and July 2018 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 29 females, with an age of 14-76 years (mean, 50.7 years). The fixed segment included 19 cases of C0-C2, 27 cases of C0-C3, 14 cases of C0-C4, and 1 case of C0-C5. The O-EA angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, and T1 tilt angle were measured before operation and at last follow-up. According to the O-EA angle measured at last follow-up, the patients were divided into <95° group (group A), 95°-105° group (group B), and >105° group (group C), and compared the differences of gender, age, fixed segment (short segment was at C3 and above, long segment was beyond C3), and C2-7 Cobb angle. Correlation analysis between the O-EA angle and C2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up, as well as the changes of O-EA angle and C2-7 Cobb angle between before operation and at last follow-up were analyzed.ResultsAll 61 patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 22.4 months. There was no significant difference in O-EA angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, and T1 tilt angle before operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). According to the last follow-up O-EA angle grouping, there were 14 cases in group A, 29 cases in group B, and 18 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender composition, and fixed segment composition among the three groups (P>0.05); the differences in C2-7 Cobb angles among the three groups were significant (P<0.05), groups A, B, and C showed a gradually increasing trend. The O-EA angle was positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up (r=0.572, P=0.000; r=0.618, P=0.000); O-EA angle change at last follow-up was also positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb change (r=0.446, P=0.000).ConclusionThe O-EA angle of patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation is positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle. Too large O-EA angle should be avoided during occipitocervical fixation, otherwise it may accelerate the degeneration of the lower cervical spine.

    Release date:2021-04-27 09:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content