Objective To identify the effect of β-endorphin in the development of paresthesia in hypertrophic scar by detecting the expression and content of β-endorphin in human normal skin and hypertrophic scar. Methods Hypertrophic scar samples were collected from 42 patients with hypertrophic scar for 1-20 years (mean, 4.5 years), including 15 males and27 females with an average age of 32.6 years (range, 16-50 years). According to the kind of paresthesia, they were divided into 3 gourps: non-pain-pruritus group (n=20), pruritus group (n=14), and pain-pruritus group (n=8). Normal skin samples (normal skin group) were harvested from 5 patients undergoing skin grafting surgery, including 3 males and 2 females with an average age of 24.6 years (range, 15-37 years). The immunofluorescence method was used to observe the expression of β-endorphin and ELISA method to detect the concentrations of β-endorphin in the tissues. Results The β-endorphin expressed in all samples, and it expressed around peri pheral nerve fibers in the dermis, fibroblasts, and monocytoid cells princi pally; and it expressed significantly ber in pruritus group and pain-pruritus group than in non-pain-pruritus group and normal skin group. The β-endorphin content was (617.401 ± 97.518) pg/mL in non-pain-pruritus group, (739.543 ± 94.149) pg/mL in pruritus group, (623.294 ± 149.613) pg/mL in pain-pruritus group, and (319.734 ± 85.301) pg/mL in normal skin group; it was significantly higher in non-pain-pruritus group, pruritus group, and pain-pruritus group than in normal skin group (P lt; 0.05); it was significantly higher in pruritus group than in non-pain-pruritus group and pain-pruritus group (P lt; 0.05); and there was no significant difference between non-pain-pruritus group and pain-pruritus group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The expression of β-endorphin is high in hypertrophic scar, it may paly an important role in process of pruritus in these patients.
Objective To evaluate the effects of prophylactic ondansetron for preventing intrathecal opioid induced pruritus. Methods According to the Cochrane Handbook, such databases as The Cochrane Library, OVID, EMbase, PubMed, CNKI and CBM were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about ondansetron for preventing intrathecal opioid induced pruritus. According to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literatures were screened, and meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eight RCTs involving 577 patients were included. The quality evaluation showed the bias of all studies was unclear. Meta-analysis showed that because the heterogeneity of the included studies was so large (P=0.0001, I2=80%), subgroup analyses were performed. The subgroup analyses on surgery methods showed no statistical heterogeneity among all subgroups. a) There was a significant difference in incidence rate of pruritus between the ondansetron group and the control group in arthroscopic knee or urologic surgery (RR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.67); b) There was no significant difference in incidence rate of pruritus between the ondansetron group and the control group in obstetric surgery (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.12); c) There was a significant difference in incidence rate of pruritus between the ondansetron group and the control group in gynecologic surgery (RR=0.51, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.76); and d) There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of pruritus between the ondansetron group and the control group in outpatient surgery (RR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.67). Conclusion The subgroup analyses performed because of the large heterogeneity of the included studies indicate that ondansetron can prevent the intrathecal opioid induced pruritus in arthroscopic knee, urologic and gynecological surgeries rather than obstetric and outpatient surgeries. Due to the small scale, large heterogeneity and unclear quality evaluation of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are required to provide reliable evidence.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of local versus systemic application of opioids for labor analgesia. Methods We searched PubMed (1966 to January 2008), EMBASE (1980 to January 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), CBM (1978 to January 2008), CNKI (1979 to January 2008) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving local versus systemic application of opioids for labor analgesia. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 12 trials involving 5909 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed that local application of opioids was superior to systemic application in terms of maternal satisfaction with pain relief during labor (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.09). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the incidence of low neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.01). Conclusion Local application of opioids for labor analgesia appears to be more effective than systematic use in reducing pain during labor. But as for safety concerns, maternal and neonatal adverse effects are observed in both groups. Thus, more high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of Shenfutuodu capsule in the treatment of opioid withdrawal syndrome. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 , 2005 ) , MEDLINE (1966 -2005) , EMBASE (1974-2005) , and some Chinese databases for additional articles (CBMdisc, CMCC, VIP, CNKI ) (1980-2005 ). The quality of included randomized controlled trials was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed.Results Our initial search identified just three studies involving 293 patients met the inclusion criteria and were of higher quality. There was a statistical difference between Shenfutuodu capsule and clonidine groups on the fifth day in withdrawl symptom score with weight mean difference (WMD) -3.14 and 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.28 to -0.01. And no statistical difference was detected between the two groups in withdrawal symptom score on the 0th-4th day and the 6th-10th daywith WMD 58.45(95% CI 53.88 to 63.02), -1. 15 (95% CI -5.69 to 3.40) , -0.42(95% CI -4.55 to 3.70), -0.77(95%CI -4.37 to 2. 84), -1.54(95%CI -4.78 to 1.69), -1.76(95%CI -4.25 to0.74) , -1.74(95%CI -3.89 to0.41), -1.24(95%CI -3.28 to0.80), -0.52(95%CI -1.96 to0.92 ) and -0.27(95% CI -1.64 to 1.11 ) respectively. There was no statistical difference on effectiveness between the two groups on the third day with WMD 1.52, (95% CI 0.79 to 2.95). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in HAMA score on the first , fifth and tenth day with WMD -0.55(95% CI -3.74 to 2.64) , 0.34 (95% CI -2.02 to 2.70) , 0. 63 (95% CI -0.21 to 1.47 ) respectively. There was a statistical difference between the two groups in dizziness rate with RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.87 ) . No statistical difference was detected between the two groups in dry mouth with RR 1.11(95% CI 0.95 to 1.29) , somnolence with RR 0.99(95% CI 0.82 to 1.21) , and blurred vision with RR 0.92(95% CI 0.70 to 1.19). Statistical difference was detected between the two groups in side effect score on the second day with WMD -1.26 (95% CI -2.40 to -0. 12 ). No statistical difference was detected between the two groups in side effect score on the first day, the third to tenth day with WMD -0.55 ( 95% CI -1.48 to0.38), -0.63 (95%CI -1.67 to0.42), -0.84 (95%CI -1.77 to0.09), -0.29 (95%CI -1.09 to 0.51), 0.15 (95% CI -0.52 to 0.81), 0. 22 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.67), 0.09(95% CI -0.25 to 0.44), 0.03 (95% CI -0.21 to 0.27) , -0.03 (95% CI -0.33 to 0.26) respectively. Conclusions Based on the current evidence, Shenfutuodu capsule may be an effective and safe drug or abstinence of drug addiction. More well designed randomized controlled trials are required .
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between OPRM1 gene rs1799971 polymorphism and opioid analgesics requirement after surgery in Asians. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including CNKI, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data, EMbase and MEDLINE to collect studies about the correlation between OPRM1 gene rs1799971 polymorphism and opioid analgesics requirement after surgery in Asia. The retrieval time was from the establishment to March 1st, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk bias of including studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 10 case-control studies involving 1 612 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the requirement of opioid analgesics after surgery for GG genotype carriers was more than AG carriers (SMD=-0.44, 95%CI -0.61 to -0.28, P<0.000 01), AA genotype carriers (SMD=-0.55, 95%CI -0.71 to -0.38, P<0.000 01), and AA+AG genotype carriers (SMD=-0.50, 95%CI -0.66 to -0.35, P<0.000 01). ConclusionThe current evidence showed that the requirement of opioid analgesics after surgery for GG genotype of rs1799971 polymorphism in OPRM1 gene is higher in Asians. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above results are needed to be further validated by more studies.
In 2020, the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS), the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), the American Hip Society (THS), the American Knee Society (TKS) have worked together to develop clinical practice guidelines on the use of Opioids in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This clinical practice guideline formulates recommendations for common and important questions related to the efficacy and safety of Opioids in primary TJA. This article interprets the guideline to help doctors make clinical decisions.