Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of Kummell disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 11 patients with Kummell disease treated by PKP between January 2013 and January 2016. There were 8 males and 3 females with an average age of 72.3 years old ranging from 64 to 78. The injured vertebra was located at T11 in 2 patients, T12 in 3, and L1 in 6. All the patients suffered from lower back pain for 2.5-15.0 months averaging 7.6 months. Preoperative CT and MRI examinations showed that there were clear signs of intravertebral vacuum cleft and abnormal fluid signals. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the height and kyphotic angle of the injured vertebral body were measured to evaluate the clinical outcomes before and after surgery. Results Follow-up was conducted for all 11 patients. Cement leakage occurred in 4 patients with no symptoms. The vertebral height, Cobb angel of the injured vertebra, VAS and ODI improved significantly after surgery and during the latest follow-up. Compared with those parameters after surgery, only VAS score was different during the latest follow-up. Conclusion PKP is safe and effective in the treatment of Kummell disease.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and interlaminar fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar (L) 5-Sacral (S) 1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsLDH patients were retrospectively included from January 2016 to Januray 2018. And the patients were divided into the PEID group and the fenestration group according to their choice of different surgical methods. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and bed rest time in the two groups were recorded. The preoperative and postoperative [1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and last follow-up (>12 months)] Visual Analogue Score (VAS) of the lumbago and leg pain between the two groups were compared; the preoperative and postoperative [1 week, and last follow-up (>12 months)] Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and also the postoperative [(>12 months)] therapeutic effect (modified MacNab) between the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 66 patients were included, with 31 in the PEID group and 35 in the fenestration group. There was no significant difference in age, gender and course of disease between the two groups (P>0.05). There were leakage of cerebrospinal fluid and transient lumbago, leg pain and numbness, which were worse than those before operation in the PEID group (1 and 1 patient, respectively) and the fenestration group (2 and 3 patients, respectively). There were statistically significant differences between the PEID group and the fenestration group, in the operative time [(90.65±9.98) vs. (66.23±16.50) minutes], intra-operative blood loss [(51.77±18.64) vs. (184.29±78.38) mL], and bed time [(2.87±0.92) vs. (7.49±1.20) d] (t=−7.365, t’=−9.697, t=−17.374, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the preoperative VAS score (lumbar-leg pain) and ODI index, and the ODI index at each postoperative time point, between the two groups (P>0.05). VAS score (lumbago) and VAS score (leg pain) in the PEID group at each postoperative time point were lower than those in the fenestration group (P<0.05); VAS scores (leg pain) at other time points were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS (lumbar-leg pain) score and ODI index at each postoperative time point were lower than those before the surgery. The was no statistically significant difference in the PEID group (90.32%) and fenestration group (85.71%) in the excellent rate (χ2=0.328, P=0.713).ConclusionsPEID has less surgical trauma, less bleeding, short bed rest, fast recovery, and better relief of postoperative lumbago symptoms. It is worthy of further promotion in clinical work.