【摘要】目的探讨喉癌手术后患者对两种不同雾化方式的耐受性,为选择最佳雾化方式提供参考。方法将49例喉癌手术后患者随机分为观察组(25例)和对照组(24例),观察组采用氧气雾化吸入,对照组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入。分别记录两组患者雾化吸入前及吸入15 min时脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)及心率;雾化过程中患者有无心慌、气紧等不适以及雾化后痰液的性质及量。采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析。结果两组患者雾化吸入15 min时的SpO2差异有统计学意义(Plt;001),观察组高于对照组;而两组患者雾化吸入前SpO2、心率、不适主诉及雾化后痰液的性质差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;005)。结论氧气雾化吸入可以提高喉癌手术后患者雾化过程中的SpO2,使患者感觉更加舒适。【Abstract】Objective To investigate postoperative patients with laryngeal carcinoma atomization of two different forms of tolerance, in order to choose the best means of atomization. Methods Fifty postoperative patients with laryngeal carcinoma were divided into observation group using oxygen inhalation and control group using the air compression pump inhalation. Two groups of patients were recorded the value of SpO2 and heart rate before 15 minutes after the inhalation,as well as the discomforts such as flustered,gas tight during the atomization process and the nature and olume of sputum. Results The results of two groups of patients at the time of 15 minutes inhalation SpO2 statistically significant difference (Plt;001), the observation group than in the control group average SpO2 high; and two groups of patients with preinhalation SpO2 average, average heart rate, Discomfort chief complaint and the nature of sputum after aerosol compared no significant difference (Pgt;005). Conclusion Oxygen inhalation in patients with laryngeal cancer can improve the atomization process SpO2 value, so that patients feel more comfortable.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical effects of non-humidified versus humidified low-to-moderate flow oxygen inhalation therapy via nasal cannula. MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical controlled trials (CCTs) and cross-over studies about the clinical effects of non-humidified versus humidified low-to-moderate flow nasal cannula oxygen inhalation therapy in hospitalized adult patients were searched in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2016), The Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Database, EMbase, PubMed, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to March 2016. Three reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of nine RCTs and three CCTs involving 3 756 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that: non-humidified was superior to humidified oxygen therapy in reducing bacterial contamination of oxygen apparatus (P < 0.05) and the time of daily replacement of sterile water oxygen humidifier bottles (P < 0.05), while the two groups were alike in relieving nasal dryness (RR=1.08, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.29, P=0.37), nasal bleeding (RR=1.17, 95%CI 0.66 to 2.08, P=0.59) and discomfort (RR=0.80, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.14, P=0.22). ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that there is no significant difference between non-humidified and humidified low-to-moderate flow nasal cannula oxygen inhalation therapy in relieving patients' nasal dryness, nasal bleeding and discomfort. But non-humidified oxygen therapy can reduce bacterial contamination of oxygen apparatus, simplify the operation procedures and lessen nurses' operation time.
ObjectiveTo assess the effect of prolonged oxygen inhalation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on early postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients.MethodsPatients who underwent primary unilateral THA from June to December 2018 were divided into a conventional oxygen inhalation group (control group) and a prolonged oxygen inhalation group (trial group) according to a random number table. The control group received oxygen inhalation via a single nasal catheter from their return to the ward after surgery until 08:00 a.m. on the first day postoperatively. In addition to routine oxygen inhalation, the trial group received oxygen inhalation during the rehabilitation exercise in bed and before half an hour of floor activities on the first and second day after operation. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, pain, fatigue score, hip mobility and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores were recorded and analyzed at 24 and 48 hours after surgery.ResultsA total of 60 patients were included finally, 30 patients in each group. At 24 and 48 h after surgery, the differences were statistically significant in the respiratory rate [(20.30±1.20) vs. (21.40±1.04) breaths per minute, (18.87±1.14) vs. (22.03±0.85) breaths per minute], oxygen saturation [(94.70±2.34)% vs. (90.60±0.73)%, (96.40±1.81)% vs. (91.20±0.85)%］, abduction angles of hip joint [(33.50±5.44) vs. (29.31±5.30)°, (38.67±2.60) vs. (33.00±4.84)°], pain scores (3.03±1.27 vs. 5.07±1.14, 1.43±0.97 vs. 3.60±1.13) and fatigue scores (4.17±1.34 vs. 8.20±0.61, 3.23±1.38 vs. 7.43±1.19) between the trial group and control group (P<0.05). PSQI scores (2.20±0.76 vs. 3.97±0.76) on the first day after surgery, and hip flexion [(105.17±4.82) vs. (99.50±2.40)°] , heart rate [(72.86± 6.38) vs. (79.40±3.97) beats per minute], diastolic blood pressure [(71.43±10.24）vs. (77.57±4.59) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)] at 48 h after surgery in the trial group were better than the those in control group (P<0.05).ConclusionCompared with conventional oxygen inhalation, prolonged oxygen inhalation after THA in elderly patients can improve postoperative pain, fatigue, sleep and hip function.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy, which is important in noninvasive respiratory support, is increasingly being used in critically ill neonates with respiratory failure because it is comfortable, easy to set up, and has a low incidence of nasal trauma. The advantages, indications, and risks of HFNC have been the focus of research in recent years, resulting in the development of the application. Based on current evidence, we developed guidelines for HFNC in neonates using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE). The guideline was formulated after extensive consultations with neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurse specialists, and evidence-based medicine experts. We have proposed 24 recommendations for 9 key questions. This guideline aims to be a source of evidence and references of HFNC oxygen therapy in clinical practice, and so that more neonates and their families will benefit from HFNC.