ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effects, advantages, and disadvantages of a new penile circumcision and suturing device in circumcision, by comparing it with traditional circumcision and circumcision with Shang Ring.MethodsThe clinical data of 397 outpatients who underwent surgery for redundant prepuce or phimosis between February 2016 and February 2018 in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University were retrospectively collected. The patients chose their surgical types in accordance with the principle of voluntary, with 134 cases undergoing traditional circumcision (the traditional circumcision group), 153 cases undergoing circumcision with Shang Ring (the Shang Ring group), and 110 cases undergoing circumcision with the new penile circumcision and suturing device (PCSD group). The safety, clinical efficacy, and complications among the three groups were compared.ResultsThere were significant differences in postoperative pain scores (F=86.901, P<0.001), edema scores (F=315.656, P<0.001), and appearance scores (F=230.952, P<0.001) among the three groups, and the pain, edema, and appearance scores were significantly better in the PCSD group than those in the traditional circumcision group (P<0.05) and the Shang Ring group (P<0.05). The differences among the three groups in the postoperative pain relief time (F=236.622, P<0.001), intraoperative bleeding volume (F=115.375, P<0.001), edema subsiding time (F=75.614, P<0.001), operation time (F=965.420, P<0.001), and incision healing time (F=42.584, P<0.001) were statistically significant, and the PCSD group was superior to the traditional circumcision group (P<0.05) and the Shang Ring group (P<0.05) in pain relief time, edema subsiding time, and incision healing time. The incidence of postoperative complications in the PCSD group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group and the Shang Ring group (χ2=21.622, P<0.001; χ2=22.778, P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume or operation time between the Shang Ring group and the PCSD group (P=1.000, 0.379), and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the traditional circumcision group and the Shang Ring group (χ2=0.014, P=0.912). The proportion of cases undergoing the three surgical methods in each half year changed significantly (χ2=18.721, P<0.001).ConclusionThe use of the new type of penile circumcision and suturing device for circumcision is simple and convenient in clinical operation, with fewer complications, quick recovery, and high satisfaction, and it is worthy of application and promotion.