Objective To summarize the cl inical effect of a new operative technique of combining penis flap with buccal mucosa graft in the treatment of phall ical urethral stricture. Methods From March 2006 to December 2007, 6 patients with phall ical urethral stricture, aged 3-26 years old, were treated by the method of combining degloved penis flap with buccalmucosa graft. All of them had the symptom of dysuria within 2-10 months after urethroplasty. The urethral stent of highelasticity sil ica was kept for 2-3 weeks after operation. Results Five patients’ incisions obtained heal ing by first intention with satisfying urination and there were no compl ications. Sl ight infection appeared in 1 case at 3 days after operation, with small quantities of suppurative exudate in the incision, which healed through open drainage and washing with antibacterial 2 weeks later. The thinning of the urinary stream was presented at 1 month after operation, and then disappeared after 2-month urethral dilatation. All the 6 patients were followed up for 6-10 months and they felt satisfied with emiction. They had a l ittle bit thicker urinary streams than those of their own age. There was not any residual urine in bladder after emiction. Conclusion The method of combining penis flap with buccal mucosa graft is effective in the treatment of phall ical urethral stricture. It deserves to be popularized due to its simple operation and credible effects.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical treatment measures and etiology analysis of lower urinary tract and penile foreign bodies. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the etiology and diagnosis of 48 cases of lower urinary tract and penile foreign body in the Department of Urology of our hospital between 1993 and 2012. ResultsNine bladder foreign bodies were removed successfully by using cystoscopy; nine were removed through suprapubic cystotomy; urethral foreign bodies in 10 patients were successfully taken out by urethrascope; five foreign bodies were extracted by hand and forceps; rubber bands in 2 patients were cut off under local anesthesia; fretsaw was used to cut through the nested rings in 7 patients; dental drill was used to cut nesting materials in 3 patients; and 3 patients underwent penis skin circumcision overturn stripping ring extraction. No complications after urethral foreign body extraction occurred. ConclusionThe lower urinary tract and penile foreign bodies are easy to diagnose, but patients often conceal the etiology, so the natural history collection is very important in the diagnosis, and doctors should take appropriate methods to remove the foreign body after the diagnosis is confirmed.