Objective To investigate the effects of hand assistant laporoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization on systemic stress responses. Methods Forty patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension were selected， 20 cases of which were underwent hand assistant laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (LAP group)， and the other 20 were underwent open splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (OP group). The levels of blood glucose （BG）, insulin (Ins), triiodothyronine （T3）, tetraiodothyronine （T4）, corticosteroid （CS） and other related clinical data were measured before operation and on day 1-3 after operation, which were compared between two groups. Results There was no statistical significance between two groups on those levels before operation. On day 1 after operation， BG and CS level in both two groups were higher than those before operation (P＜0.05), but they were recovered on day 2 after operation in LAP group (Pgt;0.05), and on day 3 after operation in OP group (Pgt;0.05). BG and CS level in OP group were markedly higher than those in LAP group on day 2 after operation (P＜0.05). On day 1 after operation， Ins, T3 and T4 level of two groups were lower than those before operation (P＜0.05), but they were recovered on day 2 after operation in LAP group (Pgt;0.05) and on day 3 after operation in OP group (Pgt;0.05). Ins, T3 and T4 level in OP group were lower than those in LAP group on day 2 after operation (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between two groups (Pgt;0.05). But laparoscopic surgery had more advantages than conventional open surgery such as reducing bleeding quantity in operation, shortening recovery time of bowel and urinary bladder function and the length of stay. Conclusion Compared with laparotomy, the laparoscope not only imposes less impact on physical stress system, but also makes recovery after operation more quickly.
Objective To explore the methods， clinical effects， and application value of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension who performed laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization between july 2009 and july 2012 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectivly. Results In 23 cases， 2 cases were converted laparotomy due to bleeding， 21 cases were successfully performed laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization. The operative time was 230-380 minutes （average 290 minutes）. The intraoperative blood loss was 300-1 500 mL （average 620 mL）. The postoperative fasting time was 1-3 days （average 2 days）. The postoperative hospital stay was 8-14 days （average 10 days）. Conclusion Laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization is a feasible， effective， and safe procedure as well as minimally invasive hence is applicable for patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism．
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect and incidence rate of major postoperative complications of pericardial devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension. MethodsEnglish and Chinese literatures about pericardial deva-scularization in treatment of portal hypertension were searched through Medline, Elsevier, PubMed, CNKI, and WanFang database, and meta analysis was taken in the process by using R-2.15 software. ResultsIn total of 671 literatures were searched and 23 were selected finally according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria.The results of meta analysis showed that, the effect of pericardial devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension were as follows:the incidence rate of rebleeding was 21%(95% CI: 0.18-0.24), the incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 4%(95% CI: 0.02-0.06), the incidence rate of ascites was 29%(95% CI: 0.14-0.47), mortality of operation was 3%(95% CI: 0.02-0.04), mortality was 23%(95% CI: 0.15-0.33). ConclusionsThere is a certain incidence rate of complications of pericardial devascularization, of which the most common complication is rebleeding.So, it is necessary to do further improvement and development of pericardial devascularization.
ObjectiveTo summarize the recent development of surgical treatment for portal hypertension with hypersplenism. MethodsThe related literatures on various operation treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism at home and abroad in recent years were collected and reviewed. ResultsThere are many operation treatment methods of hypertension with hypersplenism, includes the pericardial devascularization, subtotal splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, spleen radiofrequency ablation, splenic artery ligation, distal splenorenal shunt, and so on. The different operation methods each has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are a certain percentage of the incidence of complications. At the same time, due to the limited understanding of the function of the spleen in portal hypertension, the treatment of "resecting" or "reserving" spleen has always been the hot spot of the academic dispute. ConclusionFor what kind of operation method is the most suitable for the treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism is no fixed conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate impact of splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization on liver hemodynamics and liver function for liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension. MethodsThe internal diameter, maximum velocity, minimum velocity, mean velocity, and flow volume of portal vein and hepatic artery of 42 cases of liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension were measured by Doppler ultrasonic instrument on day 1 before operation and on day 7 after operation. The free portal pressures at different phases (after open abdomen, after splenic artery ligation, after splenectomy, and after devasculanrization) were read from the disposable pressure sensor. Twenty-four healthy people through physical examination were selected as control. Results① The free portal pressure of liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension was decreased from (29.12±1.40) mm Hg after open abdomen to (22.71±1.21) mm Hg after splenic artery ligation, and further decreased to (21.32±1.12) mm Hg after splenectomy, but increased to (22.42±1.15) mm Hg after devasculanrization, the difference was statisticly different (all P < 0.01). ② Compared with the healthy people, for the liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension, the internal diameter, maximum velocity, minimum velocity, and flow volume of portal vein were significantly enlarged (all P < 0.01), which of hepatic artery were significantly reduced (all P < 0.01) on day 1 before operation; On day 7 after operation, the internal diameter of portal vein was significantly reduced (P < 0.01), the maximum velocity, minimum velocity, and mean velocity of portal vein were significantly enlarged (all P < 0.01), but the internal diameter of hepatic artery was significantly reduced (P < 0.01), the maximum velocity, minimum velocity, mean velocity, and flow volume of hepatic artery were significantly enlarged (all P < 0.01). For the liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension, compared with the values on day 1 before operation, the internal diameter and the flow volume of portal vein were significantly reduced (all P < 0.01) on day 7 after operation; the internal diameter, maximum velocity, minimum velocity, mean velocity, and flow volume of hepatic artery were significantly enlarged (all P < 0.01) on day 7 after operation. ③ The Child-Pugh classification of liver function between before and after surgery had no significant difference (χ2=1.050, P > 0.05). ④ No death and no hepatic encephalopathy occurred, no thrombosis of splenic vein or portal vein was observed on day 7 after surgery. Conclusionsplenectomy plus pericardial devascularization could decrease portal vein pressure and reduce blood flow of portal vein, while increase blood flow of hepatic artery, it doesn't affect liver function.