Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for patients with post-stroke depression. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hyperbaric oxygen treatment with placebo or open control in patients with post-stroke depression were comprehensively retrieved in PubMed (1966 to 2012.12), EMbase (1974 to 2012.12), EBSCO (1965 to 2012.12), CENTRAL (2012.11), CBM (1978 to 2012.12), CNKI (1980 to 2012.12), and VIP (1989 to 2012.12). References of the included articles were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Results Twelve trials involving 822 patients were included, all of which were randomized non-placebo controlled trials. The results of meta-analysis of 12 trials (n=822) showed, the improvement of depression symptoms in the HBO group was better than that in the control group (MD=4.82, 95%CI 3.12 to 6.52). However, funnel plot showed that publication bias was large. After removing three trials for sensitive analysis, the results showed that the improvement of depression symptoms in the HBO group was still better than that in the control group (MD=3.91, 95%CI 3.35 to 4.47). Adverse events were reported in 2 trials, including dizziness, palpitation, mild earache, tinnitus, etc. However, no severe adverse events occurred. Conclusion Current evidence indicates that, HBO can effectively reduce the score of HAMD and no serious adverse reactions occurred. It’s necessary to further carry out high quality randomized controlled trials with large sample size due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, so as to assess its effectiveness and safety.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of Wuling capsule for patients with depression after stroke. MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Wuling capsule for treating the patients with post-stroke depression was searched in PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2013), EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from the dates of their establishment to November 2013. Literature screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of the included studies were completed by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of eighteen RCTs involving 1 683 patients were finally enrolled. The results of meta-analysis indicated that:a) the Wuling capsule group was more effective in decreasing depression scores than the control group at 4, 8, 12 weeks (4 weeks:SMD=-0.87, 95%CI-1.25 to-0.5, P < 0.000 1; 8 weeks:SMD=-1.22, 95%CI-1.86 to-0.59, P=0.000 2; 12 weeks:SMD=-0.62, 95%CI-1.09 to-0.15, P=0.01). b) The effectiveness rate (92.7%) of the Wuling capsule group was significantly higher than that of the control group (77.2%) at the end of follow-up, with a significant difference (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.27, P < 0.000 01). c) The two groups were alike in the incidence of palpitation. ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that, Wuling capsule improves the symptoms of stroke-stroke depression with less adverse reaction. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more multicenter high quality RCTs with large sample size are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in the prevention of post-stroke depression (PSD).MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on escitalopram in preventing PSD from inception to March 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs involving 891 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the control group, the escitalopram group could reduce the incidence of PSD (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.98, P=0.04). In addition, there was no statistical difference between escitalopram group and control group in rate of adverse events (P≥0.05).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that escitalopram can reduce the incidence of PSD without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.