To analyze the effectiveness of anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction with preserving the remnant ACL by allograft l igament. Methods Between January and July in 2008, 97 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with the allograft l igament. On the basis of the ACL’s condition, patients were divided into 2 groups. In the trial group (patients having remnant ACL, n=38), there were 27 males and 11 females with an average age of 24.3 years (range, 16-43 years); of them, 8 cases compl icated by menicus injury and 13 cases by Outbridge I degree cartilage injury; the time from injuryto operation was 3-20 weeks (mean, 8.6 weeks). In the control group (patients having no remnant ACL, n=59), there were 35 males and 24 females with an average age of 27.8 years (range, 18-48 years); of them, 16 cases compl icated by menicus injury and 23 cases by Outbridge I degree cartilage injury; the time from injury to operation was 4-44 weeks (mean, 12.7 weeks). All injuries were caused by sports in 2 groups. All patients had positive anterior drawer test and positive Lackman test. Before operation and 3, 8, 9, 15 months after operation, the function of the knee joint was evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scale and Lysholm score. KT-2000 arthrometer was used to evaluate knee laxity. Results All incisions healed primarily, and no intraarticular infection occurred. Thirty-seven cases and 57 cases were followed up 15 months in the trial group and the control group, respectively. Knee instabil ity disappeared; the patients showed negative anterior drawer test and negative Lackman test. By the evaluation of KT-2000, the joint sl ippage of 2 groups were less than 2 mm at 3 and 6 months after operation, but it was more than 2 mm in 2 cases of the trial group and in 3 cases of the control group at 9 months after operation; and it was no change in the trial group and 2.5-4.0 mm (mean, 3.4 mm) in the control group at 15 months after operation. Both the IKDC scale and Lysholm score were higher in the trial group than in the control group 3 months after operation, but the differences were not significant (P gt; 0.05). Both the IKDC scale and Lysholm score were
Objective To discuss the feasibility and clinical outcomes of fast-track (FT) surgery for elderly patients (≥70 years) with colorectal carcinoma. Methods Between November 2007 and January 2009, 103 elderly patients were analyzed prospectively, who were divided into FT group and traditional group randomly. All 103 patients had completed the entire study. Postoperative complications and early rehabilitations were studied and compared. In addition, completion of FT courses was recorded. Results ① In early rehabilitation, the time of first ambulation was (1.96±0.89) d and (2.92±1.43) d, oral intaking was (2.41±0.92) d and (3.62±1.40) d, and first flatus was (3.88±1.05) d and (4.52±1.29) d in the FT group and the traditional group, respectively. The early rehabilitation indexes in the FT group were significantly earlier than those in the traditional group (Plt;0.05). ② Postoperative hospital stay was (9.27±1.87) d and (12.75±7.05) d in the FT group and the traditional group, respectively, in the FT group which was shorter than that in the traditional group (Plt;0.05). ③ The mortality rate and readmission rate was 0 on 2 weeks after operation in two groups. ④ The total morbidity rate was 11.76% (6/51) in the FT group, in the traditional group was 28.85% (15/52), there was significant difference between two groups (Plt;0.05), while there was no significant difference in general complications and surgical complications between two groups (Pgt;0.05).Conclusions FT surgery for elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma is feasible and could enhance recovery, cut down morbidity rate and shorten postoperative hospital stay. If the FT courses are more completed, the clinical outcomes could be better.
Objective To compare the postoperative anorectal pressure after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) in treatment of patients with mixed hemorrhoid of Ⅲ-degree. Methods In total of 112 patients with mixed hemorrhoid of Ⅲ-degree who underwent PPH (n=60) or MMH (n=52) in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between March 2014 to March 2015 were prospectively enrolled, the type of surgery was according to patients’ individual choice. In 6 months after operation, all patients under-went the examination of anorectal manometry which including rectal anal inhibitory reflex, rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, maximal anal contractive pressure, and anal canal length of high pressure belt. Results In 6 months after operation, the positive rate of rectal anal inhibitory reflex 〔88.3% (53/60) vs. 61.5% (32/52)〕 , anal resting pressure 〔(56.42± 2.25) mm Hg vs. (46.31±2.58) mm Hg〕, and anal canal length of high pressure belt 〔(3.35±0.12) cm vs. (2.29±0.23) cm〕 of PPH group were all significantly higher than those of MMH group (P＜0.05), but there was no statistical significance between PPH group and MMH group in rectal resting pressure 〔(5.51±1.26) mm Hg vs. (5.39±1.85) mm Hg〕 and maximal anal contractive pressure 〔(156.64±9.78) mm Hg vs. (155.32±8.53) mm Hg〕, P>0.05. Conclusion PPH and MMH are all effective to treat mixed hemorrhoids of Ⅲ-degree, but PPH is more positive in protection of anal function.
Risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) are two common effect measures in prospective studies. When describing the magnitude of clinical effects in the original study and meta-analysis, they cannot be used interchangeably. Selecting an appropriate measures and interpreting them correctly is critical in clinical research. In this study, we summarized similarities and differences between risk and hazard, compared differences between RR and HR in estimation methods and clinical interpretation. The magnitude of RR and HR estimated from the same studies were compared, and two feasible formulas converting between RR and HR were presented for meta-analysis.